Pragmatic tools for sharing genomic research results with the relatives of living and deceased research participants

Susan M. Wolf; Emily Scholtes; Barbara A. Koenig; Gloria M. Petersen; Susan A. Berry; Laura M. Beskow; Mary B. Daly; Conrad V. Fernandez; Robert C. Green; Bonnie S. Leroy; Noralane M. Lindor; Pearl O’Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A. Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S. Wilfond

doi:10.1177/1073110518766024

Pragmatic tools for sharing genomic research results with the relatives of living and deceased research participants

Susan M. Wolf, Emily Scholtes, Barbara A. Koenig, Gloria M. Petersen, Susan A. Berry, Laura M. Beskow, Mary B. Daly, Conrad V. Fernandez, Robert C. Green, Bonnie S. Leroy, Noralane M. Lindor, Pearl O’Rourke, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Mark A. Rothstein, Brian Van Ness, Benjamin S. Wilfond

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Returning genomic research results to family members raises complex questions. Genomic research on life-limiting conditions such as cancer, and research involving storage and reanalysis of data and specimens long into the future, makes these questions pressing. This author group, funded by an NIH grant, published consensus recommendations presenting a framework. This follow-up paper offers concrete guidance and tools for implementation. The group collected and analyzed relevant documents and guidance, including tools from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium. The authors then negotiated a consensus toolkit of processes and documents. That toolkit offers sample consent and notification documents plus decision flow-charts to address return of results to family of living and deceased participants, in adult and pediatric research. Core concerns are eliciting participant preferences on sharing results with family and on choice of a representative to make decisions about sharing after participant death.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	87-109
Number of pages	23
Journal	Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume	46
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518766024
State	Published - Jan 1 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Health Policy

Access to Document

10.1177/1073110518766024

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pragmatic tools for sharing genomic research results with the relatives of living and deceased research participants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Wolf, S. M., Scholtes, E., Koenig, B. A., Petersen, G. M., Berry, S. A., Beskow, L. M., Daly, M. B., Fernandez, C. V., Green, R. C., Leroy, B. S., Lindor, N. M., O’Rourke, P., Breitkopf, C. R., Rothstein, M. A., Ness, B. V., & Wilfond, B. S. (2018). Pragmatic tools for sharing genomic research results with the relatives of living and deceased research participants. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 46(1), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518766024

Pragmatic tools for sharing genomic research results with the relatives of living and deceased research participants. / Wolf, Susan M.; Scholtes, Emily; Koenig, Barbara A.; Petersen, Gloria M.; Berry, Susan A.; Beskow, Laura M.; Daly, Mary B.; Fernandez, Conrad V.; Green, Robert C.; Leroy, Bonnie S.; Lindor, Noralane M.; O’Rourke, Pearl; Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki; Rothstein, Mark A.; Ness, Brian Van; Wilfond, Benjamin S.

In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 87-109.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Wolf, SM, Scholtes, E, Koenig, BA, Petersen, GM, Berry, SA, Beskow, LM, Daly, MB, Fernandez, CV, Green, RC, Leroy, BS, Lindor, NM, O’Rourke, P, Breitkopf, CR, Rothstein, MA, Ness, BV & Wilfond, BS 2018, 'Pragmatic tools for sharing genomic research results with the relatives of living and deceased research participants', Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518766024

Wolf, Susan M. ; Scholtes, Emily ; Koenig, Barbara A. ; Petersen, Gloria M. ; Berry, Susan A. ; Beskow, Laura M. ; Daly, Mary B. ; Fernandez, Conrad V. ; Green, Robert C. ; Leroy, Bonnie S. ; Lindor, Noralane M. ; O’Rourke, Pearl ; Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki ; Rothstein, Mark A. ; Ness, Brian Van ; Wilfond, Benjamin S. / Pragmatic tools for sharing genomic research results with the relatives of living and deceased research participants. In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 2018 ; Vol. 46, No. 1. pp. 87-109.

@article{1a65c5abe9d046759067e4b922473ec4,

title = "Pragmatic tools for sharing genomic research results with the relatives of living and deceased research participants",

abstract = "Returning genomic research results to family members raises complex questions. Genomic research on life-limiting conditions such as cancer, and research involving storage and reanalysis of data and specimens long into the future, makes these questions pressing. This author group, funded by an NIH grant, published consensus recommendations presenting a framework. This follow-up paper offers concrete guidance and tools for implementation. The group collected and analyzed relevant documents and guidance, including tools from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium. The authors then negotiated a consensus toolkit of processes and documents. That toolkit offers sample consent and notification documents plus decision flow-charts to address return of results to family of living and deceased participants, in adult and pediatric research. Core concerns are eliciting participant preferences on sharing results with family and on choice of a representative to make decisions about sharing after participant death.",

author = "Wolf, {Susan M.} and Emily Scholtes and Koenig, {Barbara A.} and Petersen, {Gloria M.} and Berry, {Susan A.} and Beskow, {Laura M.} and Daly, {Mary B.} and Fernandez, {Conrad V.} and Green, {Robert C.} and Leroy, {Bonnie S.} and Lindor, {Noralane M.} and Pearl O{\textquoteright}Rourke and Breitkopf, {Carmen Radecki} and Rothstein, {Mark A.} and Ness, {Brian Van} and Wilfond, {Benjamin S.}",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1073110518766024",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "46",

pages = "87--109",

journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",

issn = "1073-1105",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatic tools for sharing genomic research results with the relatives of living and deceased research participants

AU - Wolf, Susan M.

AU - Scholtes, Emily

AU - Koenig, Barbara A.

AU - Petersen, Gloria M.

AU - Berry, Susan A.

AU - Beskow, Laura M.

AU - Daly, Mary B.

AU - Fernandez, Conrad V.

AU - Green, Robert C.

AU - Leroy, Bonnie S.

AU - Lindor, Noralane M.

AU - O’Rourke, Pearl

AU - Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki

AU - Rothstein, Mark A.

AU - Ness, Brian Van

AU - Wilfond, Benjamin S.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Returning genomic research results to family members raises complex questions. Genomic research on life-limiting conditions such as cancer, and research involving storage and reanalysis of data and specimens long into the future, makes these questions pressing. This author group, funded by an NIH grant, published consensus recommendations presenting a framework. This follow-up paper offers concrete guidance and tools for implementation. The group collected and analyzed relevant documents and guidance, including tools from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium. The authors then negotiated a consensus toolkit of processes and documents. That toolkit offers sample consent and notification documents plus decision flow-charts to address return of results to family of living and deceased participants, in adult and pediatric research. Core concerns are eliciting participant preferences on sharing results with family and on choice of a representative to make decisions about sharing after participant death.

AB - Returning genomic research results to family members raises complex questions. Genomic research on life-limiting conditions such as cancer, and research involving storage and reanalysis of data and specimens long into the future, makes these questions pressing. This author group, funded by an NIH grant, published consensus recommendations presenting a framework. This follow-up paper offers concrete guidance and tools for implementation. The group collected and analyzed relevant documents and guidance, including tools from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium. The authors then negotiated a consensus toolkit of processes and documents. That toolkit offers sample consent and notification documents plus decision flow-charts to address return of results to family of living and deceased participants, in adult and pediatric research. Core concerns are eliciting participant preferences on sharing results with family and on choice of a representative to make decisions about sharing after participant death.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055929734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055929734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073110518766024

DO - 10.1177/1073110518766024

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 30008546

AN - SCOPUS:85055929734

VL - 46

SP - 87

EP - 109

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - 1

ER -