Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods

Susan L Slager, J. Huang, V. J. Vieland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare the statistical power of the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) with that of two likelihood-based linkage tests, the classical LOD score and a modified LOD score in which a linkage disequilibrium (LD) parameter is incorporated into the likelihood (LD-LOD). We hypothesize that, when LD is present, the LD-LOD will have the greatest power of the three tests because the TDT breaks a multiplex pedigree into triads, and the LOD score has previously been shown to have lower power when LD is present but not accounted for. We test this hypothesis using a simulation study in which we generate affected sib-pair (ASP) pedigrees under a range of genetic models, varying the genotypic relative risk (GRR) from 6 to 16. Because the likelihood-based tests require that a genetic model be specified, we compare the tests under two scenarios. First, we assume the true genetic model in the analysis, and second, we compare the tests when the LD-LOD (LOD) is maximized over two wrong genetic models. For the generating models we considered, we find that the LD-LOD has greater power than the TDT even when the genetic models is mis-specified and the results corrected for multiple tests. Extreme differences occur under the multiplicative and dominant models, for which the difference in power is as high as 40% at complete LD. The LOD score provides the lowest power in the presence of LD for the range of GRR considered here.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)192-209
Number of pages18
JournalGenetic Epidemiology
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Linkage Disequilibrium
Genetic Models
Pedigree

Keywords

  • Association tests
  • Genotypic relative risks
  • Linkage tests
  • LOD score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods. / Slager, Susan L; Huang, J.; Vieland, V. J.

In: Genetic Epidemiology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2001, p. 192-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Slager, Susan L ; Huang, J. ; Vieland, V. J. / Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods. In: Genetic Epidemiology. 2001 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 192-209.
@article{5745973ba41c40bfb105dfea01b5bf99,
title = "Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods",
abstract = "We compare the statistical power of the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) with that of two likelihood-based linkage tests, the classical LOD score and a modified LOD score in which a linkage disequilibrium (LD) parameter is incorporated into the likelihood (LD-LOD). We hypothesize that, when LD is present, the LD-LOD will have the greatest power of the three tests because the TDT breaks a multiplex pedigree into triads, and the LOD score has previously been shown to have lower power when LD is present but not accounted for. We test this hypothesis using a simulation study in which we generate affected sib-pair (ASP) pedigrees under a range of genetic models, varying the genotypic relative risk (GRR) from 6 to 16. Because the likelihood-based tests require that a genetic model be specified, we compare the tests under two scenarios. First, we assume the true genetic model in the analysis, and second, we compare the tests when the LD-LOD (LOD) is maximized over two wrong genetic models. For the generating models we considered, we find that the LD-LOD has greater power than the TDT even when the genetic models is mis-specified and the results corrected for multiple tests. Extreme differences occur under the multiplicative and dominant models, for which the difference in power is as high as 40{\%} at complete LD. The LOD score provides the lowest power in the presence of LD for the range of GRR considered here.",
keywords = "Association tests, Genotypic relative risks, Linkage tests, LOD score",
author = "Slager, {Susan L} and J. Huang and Vieland, {V. J.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1002/1098-2272(200102)20:2<192::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "192--209",
journal = "Genetic Epidemiology",
issn = "0741-0395",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods

AU - Slager, Susan L

AU - Huang, J.

AU - Vieland, V. J.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We compare the statistical power of the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) with that of two likelihood-based linkage tests, the classical LOD score and a modified LOD score in which a linkage disequilibrium (LD) parameter is incorporated into the likelihood (LD-LOD). We hypothesize that, when LD is present, the LD-LOD will have the greatest power of the three tests because the TDT breaks a multiplex pedigree into triads, and the LOD score has previously been shown to have lower power when LD is present but not accounted for. We test this hypothesis using a simulation study in which we generate affected sib-pair (ASP) pedigrees under a range of genetic models, varying the genotypic relative risk (GRR) from 6 to 16. Because the likelihood-based tests require that a genetic model be specified, we compare the tests under two scenarios. First, we assume the true genetic model in the analysis, and second, we compare the tests when the LD-LOD (LOD) is maximized over two wrong genetic models. For the generating models we considered, we find that the LD-LOD has greater power than the TDT even when the genetic models is mis-specified and the results corrected for multiple tests. Extreme differences occur under the multiplicative and dominant models, for which the difference in power is as high as 40% at complete LD. The LOD score provides the lowest power in the presence of LD for the range of GRR considered here.

AB - We compare the statistical power of the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) with that of two likelihood-based linkage tests, the classical LOD score and a modified LOD score in which a linkage disequilibrium (LD) parameter is incorporated into the likelihood (LD-LOD). We hypothesize that, when LD is present, the LD-LOD will have the greatest power of the three tests because the TDT breaks a multiplex pedigree into triads, and the LOD score has previously been shown to have lower power when LD is present but not accounted for. We test this hypothesis using a simulation study in which we generate affected sib-pair (ASP) pedigrees under a range of genetic models, varying the genotypic relative risk (GRR) from 6 to 16. Because the likelihood-based tests require that a genetic model be specified, we compare the tests under two scenarios. First, we assume the true genetic model in the analysis, and second, we compare the tests when the LD-LOD (LOD) is maximized over two wrong genetic models. For the generating models we considered, we find that the LD-LOD has greater power than the TDT even when the genetic models is mis-specified and the results corrected for multiple tests. Extreme differences occur under the multiplicative and dominant models, for which the difference in power is as high as 40% at complete LD. The LOD score provides the lowest power in the presence of LD for the range of GRR considered here.

KW - Association tests

KW - Genotypic relative risks

KW - Linkage tests

KW - LOD score

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035132228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035132228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1098-2272(200102)20:2<192::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-X

DO - 10.1002/1098-2272(200102)20:2<192::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 11180446

AN - SCOPUS:0035132228

VL - 20

SP - 192

EP - 209

JO - Genetic Epidemiology

JF - Genetic Epidemiology

SN - 0741-0395

IS - 2

ER -