Potential influence of migration bias in birth cohort studies

Slavica K Katusic, Robert C. Colligan, William J. Barbaresi, Daniel J Schaid, Steven J. Jacobsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the potential bias, due to migration from the community, in a birth cohort study of learning disability in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Material and Methods: The 1976 through 1982 birth cohort consisted of 8,548 children born to mothers who were residents of Rochester, Minnesota, at the time of delivery. The current status of all children was determined for the 1995 to 1996 school year with the resources of Independent School District 535, the Rochester Epidemiology Project, and the Rochester Reading Center. Information from birth certificates was compared between migrants and nonmigrants with use of standard statistical tests. Results: The cumulative probability of migration by age 5 years was 32.2% (95% confidence interval, 31.2 to 33.2%). When migrants were compared with nonmigrants, the distributions of Apgar scores, father's age; gestational age at birth and number of children in the family were virtually identical. In contrast, migrants were more likely to be nonwhite (6% versus 2%), be born to a single parent (11% versus 7%), and have a congenital defect noted at birth (1.5% versus 0.7%). When considered simultaneously in a logistic regression model, the parents of migrants were more highly educated, migrant mothers were younger and had fewer prenatal visits, and migrant children were more likely to be black. Conclusion: This report demonstrates the extreme effort that must be made to assemble a birth cohort in our mobile society. Furthermore, the results suggest that only slight differences exist between migrants and nonmigrants; these are unlikely to compromise the future results of the ongoing learning disability study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1053-1061
Number of pages9
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume73
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Cohort Studies
Parturition
Learning Disorders
Logistic Models
Mothers
Single Parent
Birth Certificates
Apgar Score
Fathers
Gestational Age
Reading
Epidemiology
Parents
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Katusic, S. K., Colligan, R. C., Barbaresi, W. J., Schaid, D. J., & Jacobsen, S. J. (1998). Potential influence of migration bias in birth cohort studies. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 73(11), 1053-1061.

Potential influence of migration bias in birth cohort studies. / Katusic, Slavica K; Colligan, Robert C.; Barbaresi, William J.; Schaid, Daniel J; Jacobsen, Steven J.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 73, No. 11, 1998, p. 1053-1061.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Katusic, SK, Colligan, RC, Barbaresi, WJ, Schaid, DJ & Jacobsen, SJ 1998, 'Potential influence of migration bias in birth cohort studies', Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 1053-1061.
Katusic, Slavica K ; Colligan, Robert C. ; Barbaresi, William J. ; Schaid, Daniel J ; Jacobsen, Steven J. / Potential influence of migration bias in birth cohort studies. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1998 ; Vol. 73, No. 11. pp. 1053-1061.
@article{b4a47f3de5b742889c165fa0fcf3892d,
title = "Potential influence of migration bias in birth cohort studies",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the potential bias, due to migration from the community, in a birth cohort study of learning disability in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Material and Methods: The 1976 through 1982 birth cohort consisted of 8,548 children born to mothers who were residents of Rochester, Minnesota, at the time of delivery. The current status of all children was determined for the 1995 to 1996 school year with the resources of Independent School District 535, the Rochester Epidemiology Project, and the Rochester Reading Center. Information from birth certificates was compared between migrants and nonmigrants with use of standard statistical tests. Results: The cumulative probability of migration by age 5 years was 32.2{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval, 31.2 to 33.2{\%}). When migrants were compared with nonmigrants, the distributions of Apgar scores, father's age; gestational age at birth and number of children in the family were virtually identical. In contrast, migrants were more likely to be nonwhite (6{\%} versus 2{\%}), be born to a single parent (11{\%} versus 7{\%}), and have a congenital defect noted at birth (1.5{\%} versus 0.7{\%}). When considered simultaneously in a logistic regression model, the parents of migrants were more highly educated, migrant mothers were younger and had fewer prenatal visits, and migrant children were more likely to be black. Conclusion: This report demonstrates the extreme effort that must be made to assemble a birth cohort in our mobile society. Furthermore, the results suggest that only slight differences exist between migrants and nonmigrants; these are unlikely to compromise the future results of the ongoing learning disability study.",
author = "Katusic, {Slavica K} and Colligan, {Robert C.} and Barbaresi, {William J.} and Schaid, {Daniel J} and Jacobsen, {Steven J.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1053--1061",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential influence of migration bias in birth cohort studies

AU - Katusic, Slavica K

AU - Colligan, Robert C.

AU - Barbaresi, William J.

AU - Schaid, Daniel J

AU - Jacobsen, Steven J.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Objective: To assess the potential bias, due to migration from the community, in a birth cohort study of learning disability in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Material and Methods: The 1976 through 1982 birth cohort consisted of 8,548 children born to mothers who were residents of Rochester, Minnesota, at the time of delivery. The current status of all children was determined for the 1995 to 1996 school year with the resources of Independent School District 535, the Rochester Epidemiology Project, and the Rochester Reading Center. Information from birth certificates was compared between migrants and nonmigrants with use of standard statistical tests. Results: The cumulative probability of migration by age 5 years was 32.2% (95% confidence interval, 31.2 to 33.2%). When migrants were compared with nonmigrants, the distributions of Apgar scores, father's age; gestational age at birth and number of children in the family were virtually identical. In contrast, migrants were more likely to be nonwhite (6% versus 2%), be born to a single parent (11% versus 7%), and have a congenital defect noted at birth (1.5% versus 0.7%). When considered simultaneously in a logistic regression model, the parents of migrants were more highly educated, migrant mothers were younger and had fewer prenatal visits, and migrant children were more likely to be black. Conclusion: This report demonstrates the extreme effort that must be made to assemble a birth cohort in our mobile society. Furthermore, the results suggest that only slight differences exist between migrants and nonmigrants; these are unlikely to compromise the future results of the ongoing learning disability study.

AB - Objective: To assess the potential bias, due to migration from the community, in a birth cohort study of learning disability in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Material and Methods: The 1976 through 1982 birth cohort consisted of 8,548 children born to mothers who were residents of Rochester, Minnesota, at the time of delivery. The current status of all children was determined for the 1995 to 1996 school year with the resources of Independent School District 535, the Rochester Epidemiology Project, and the Rochester Reading Center. Information from birth certificates was compared between migrants and nonmigrants with use of standard statistical tests. Results: The cumulative probability of migration by age 5 years was 32.2% (95% confidence interval, 31.2 to 33.2%). When migrants were compared with nonmigrants, the distributions of Apgar scores, father's age; gestational age at birth and number of children in the family were virtually identical. In contrast, migrants were more likely to be nonwhite (6% versus 2%), be born to a single parent (11% versus 7%), and have a congenital defect noted at birth (1.5% versus 0.7%). When considered simultaneously in a logistic regression model, the parents of migrants were more highly educated, migrant mothers were younger and had fewer prenatal visits, and migrant children were more likely to be black. Conclusion: This report demonstrates the extreme effort that must be made to assemble a birth cohort in our mobile society. Furthermore, the results suggest that only slight differences exist between migrants and nonmigrants; these are unlikely to compromise the future results of the ongoing learning disability study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031762549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031762549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9818038

AN - SCOPUS:0031762549

VL - 73

SP - 1053

EP - 1061

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 11

ER -