Potential extensions of the US FRAX algorithm

L. Joseph Melton, Elizabeth J. Atkinson, Sara J. Achenbach, John A. Kanis, Terry M Therneau, Helena Johansson, Sundeep Khosla, Shreyasee Amin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine if the revised US FRAX can identify those at high risk for fractures at any skeletal site, we studied 250 women and 249 men ≥ 40 years old from an age-stratified random sample of Rochester, MN residents. At baseline, femoral neck (FN) bone density was assessed, as were the clinical risk factors included in FRAX, along with additional fracture risk factors such as bone turnover markers and fall history. Fracture ascertainment through periodic interviews and comprehensive medical record review was performed over 10 years of followup. In both women and men, a higher FRAX probability at baseline was associated with greater subsequent likelihood of a major osteoporotic fracture. However, a relative 10 increase in the FRAX 10-year fracture probability was also associated with a 1.4-fold increase (95 confidence interval (CI) 1.11.7) in other fractures in women and a 1.7-fold increase (95 CI 0.83.1) in men. Furthermore, FRAX predicted asymptomatic vertebral fractures and fractures generally in both sexes. The addition of risk factors not currently included in FRAX did not appear to improve the accuracy of fracture risk prediction. FRAX may provide a conservative estimate of risk for major osteoporotic fractures, but it also predicts fractures generally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number528790
JournalJournal of Osteoporosis
Volume2012
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Osteoporotic Fractures
Confidence Intervals
Bone Remodeling
Femur Neck
Bone Density
Medical Records
History
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Cite this

Melton, L. J., Atkinson, E. J., Achenbach, S. J., Kanis, J. A., Therneau, T. M., Johansson, H., ... Amin, S. (2012). Potential extensions of the US FRAX algorithm. Journal of Osteoporosis, 2012, [528790]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/528790

Potential extensions of the US FRAX algorithm. / Melton, L. Joseph; Atkinson, Elizabeth J.; Achenbach, Sara J.; Kanis, John A.; Therneau, Terry M; Johansson, Helena; Khosla, Sundeep; Amin, Shreyasee.

In: Journal of Osteoporosis, Vol. 2012, 528790, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Melton, LJ, Atkinson, EJ, Achenbach, SJ, Kanis, JA, Therneau, TM, Johansson, H, Khosla, S & Amin, S 2012, 'Potential extensions of the US FRAX algorithm', Journal of Osteoporosis, vol. 2012, 528790. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/528790
Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, Achenbach SJ, Kanis JA, Therneau TM, Johansson H et al. Potential extensions of the US FRAX algorithm. Journal of Osteoporosis. 2012;2012. 528790. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/528790
Melton, L. Joseph ; Atkinson, Elizabeth J. ; Achenbach, Sara J. ; Kanis, John A. ; Therneau, Terry M ; Johansson, Helena ; Khosla, Sundeep ; Amin, Shreyasee. / Potential extensions of the US FRAX algorithm. In: Journal of Osteoporosis. 2012 ; Vol. 2012.
@article{8dd07bc64a2e44fc88e1ee011d8628c9,
title = "Potential extensions of the US FRAX algorithm",
abstract = "To determine if the revised US FRAX can identify those at high risk for fractures at any skeletal site, we studied 250 women and 249 men ≥ 40 years old from an age-stratified random sample of Rochester, MN residents. At baseline, femoral neck (FN) bone density was assessed, as were the clinical risk factors included in FRAX, along with additional fracture risk factors such as bone turnover markers and fall history. Fracture ascertainment through periodic interviews and comprehensive medical record review was performed over 10 years of followup. In both women and men, a higher FRAX probability at baseline was associated with greater subsequent likelihood of a major osteoporotic fracture. However, a relative 10 increase in the FRAX 10-year fracture probability was also associated with a 1.4-fold increase (95 confidence interval (CI) 1.11.7) in other fractures in women and a 1.7-fold increase (95 CI 0.83.1) in men. Furthermore, FRAX predicted asymptomatic vertebral fractures and fractures generally in both sexes. The addition of risk factors not currently included in FRAX did not appear to improve the accuracy of fracture risk prediction. FRAX may provide a conservative estimate of risk for major osteoporotic fractures, but it also predicts fractures generally.",
author = "Melton, {L. Joseph} and Atkinson, {Elizabeth J.} and Achenbach, {Sara J.} and Kanis, {John A.} and Therneau, {Terry M} and Helena Johansson and Sundeep Khosla and Shreyasee Amin",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1155/2012/528790",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2012",
journal = "Journal of Osteoporosis",
issn = "2090-8059",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential extensions of the US FRAX algorithm

AU - Melton, L. Joseph

AU - Atkinson, Elizabeth J.

AU - Achenbach, Sara J.

AU - Kanis, John A.

AU - Therneau, Terry M

AU - Johansson, Helena

AU - Khosla, Sundeep

AU - Amin, Shreyasee

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - To determine if the revised US FRAX can identify those at high risk for fractures at any skeletal site, we studied 250 women and 249 men ≥ 40 years old from an age-stratified random sample of Rochester, MN residents. At baseline, femoral neck (FN) bone density was assessed, as were the clinical risk factors included in FRAX, along with additional fracture risk factors such as bone turnover markers and fall history. Fracture ascertainment through periodic interviews and comprehensive medical record review was performed over 10 years of followup. In both women and men, a higher FRAX probability at baseline was associated with greater subsequent likelihood of a major osteoporotic fracture. However, a relative 10 increase in the FRAX 10-year fracture probability was also associated with a 1.4-fold increase (95 confidence interval (CI) 1.11.7) in other fractures in women and a 1.7-fold increase (95 CI 0.83.1) in men. Furthermore, FRAX predicted asymptomatic vertebral fractures and fractures generally in both sexes. The addition of risk factors not currently included in FRAX did not appear to improve the accuracy of fracture risk prediction. FRAX may provide a conservative estimate of risk for major osteoporotic fractures, but it also predicts fractures generally.

AB - To determine if the revised US FRAX can identify those at high risk for fractures at any skeletal site, we studied 250 women and 249 men ≥ 40 years old from an age-stratified random sample of Rochester, MN residents. At baseline, femoral neck (FN) bone density was assessed, as were the clinical risk factors included in FRAX, along with additional fracture risk factors such as bone turnover markers and fall history. Fracture ascertainment through periodic interviews and comprehensive medical record review was performed over 10 years of followup. In both women and men, a higher FRAX probability at baseline was associated with greater subsequent likelihood of a major osteoporotic fracture. However, a relative 10 increase in the FRAX 10-year fracture probability was also associated with a 1.4-fold increase (95 confidence interval (CI) 1.11.7) in other fractures in women and a 1.7-fold increase (95 CI 0.83.1) in men. Furthermore, FRAX predicted asymptomatic vertebral fractures and fractures generally in both sexes. The addition of risk factors not currently included in FRAX did not appear to improve the accuracy of fracture risk prediction. FRAX may provide a conservative estimate of risk for major osteoporotic fractures, but it also predicts fractures generally.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876509507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876509507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2012/528790

DO - 10.1155/2012/528790

M3 - Article

C2 - 22934235

AN - SCOPUS:84876509507

VL - 2012

JO - Journal of Osteoporosis

JF - Journal of Osteoporosis

SN - 2090-8059

M1 - 528790

ER -