Population-based analysis of the relationship of whole bone strength indices and fall-related loads to age- and sex-specific patterns of hip and wrist fractures

B. Lawrence Riggs, L. Joseph Melton, Richard A. Robb, Jon J. Camp, Elizabeth J. Atkinson, Ann L Oberg, Peggy A. Rouleau, Cynthia H McCollough, Sundeep Khosla, Mary L. Bouxsein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In an age- and sex-stratified population sample (n = 700), we estimated fall-related loads and bone strength indices at the UDR and FN. These load/strength ratios more closely simulated patterns of wrist and hip fractures occurring in the same population than did measurement of vBMD. Introduction: Areal BMD measurements, although associated with fracture risk, incompletely explain patterns of fragility fractures. Moreover, population-based assessments relating applied loads and whole bone strength to fracture patterns have not been made. Materials and Methods: Using QCT, we assessed volumetric BMD (vBMD), cross-sectional geometry, and axial (EA) and flexural (EI) rigidities (indices of bone's resistance to compressive and bending loads, respectively) at the ultradistal radius (UDR) and femoral neck (FN) and estimated the loads applied to the wrist and hip during a fall. We used fall load (FL)/bone strength ratios to estimate fracture risk. Results: vBMD in young adults was similar between sexes. Decreases in vBMD over life were also similar (30% and 28%) at UDR but were somewhat greater (46% and 34%) at FN in women versus men, respectively. In young adults, FL/strength ratios at UDR were 32-51 % lower (better) in men than in women and increased (worsened) over life less in men (+4% to +22%) than in women (+20% to +33%). In young adults, FL/strength ratios at FN were only marginally better in men than in women but worsened less over life in men (+22% to +36%) than in women (+40% to +62%). Conclusions: The 6:1 female preponderance and the virtual immunity of men for age-related increases in wrist fractures are largely explained by the more favorable FL/strength ratios at UDR in young adult men (because of larger bone size and more favorable geometry) versus women and to maintaining this advantage over life. The 2-fold lower incidence of hip fractures in men versus women is largely explained by age-related increases (worsening) of FL/bone strength ratios that are only one-half of the increases in women. The moderate increases in these ratios with aging are insufficient to explain the >4-fold increase in hip fracture incidence after age 75 in both sexes, suggesting contributions of other factors, especially the well-documented increased frequency of injurious falls among the elderly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-323
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Bone and Mineral Research
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Hip Fractures
Wrist
Bone and Bones
Femur Neck
Population
Young Adult
Incidence
Hip
Immunity

Keywords

  • Bone quality
  • Falls
  • Osteoporosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Population-based analysis of the relationship of whole bone strength indices and fall-related loads to age- and sex-specific patterns of hip and wrist fractures. / Riggs, B. Lawrence; Melton, L. Joseph; Robb, Richard A.; Camp, Jon J.; Atkinson, Elizabeth J.; Oberg, Ann L; Rouleau, Peggy A.; McCollough, Cynthia H; Khosla, Sundeep; Bouxsein, Mary L.

In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, 02.2006, p. 315-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riggs, B. Lawrence ; Melton, L. Joseph ; Robb, Richard A. ; Camp, Jon J. ; Atkinson, Elizabeth J. ; Oberg, Ann L ; Rouleau, Peggy A. ; McCollough, Cynthia H ; Khosla, Sundeep ; Bouxsein, Mary L. / Population-based analysis of the relationship of whole bone strength indices and fall-related loads to age- and sex-specific patterns of hip and wrist fractures. In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 315-323.
@article{187c7904d0e14fba887ed32825aa6bfd,
title = "Population-based analysis of the relationship of whole bone strength indices and fall-related loads to age- and sex-specific patterns of hip and wrist fractures",
abstract = "In an age- and sex-stratified population sample (n = 700), we estimated fall-related loads and bone strength indices at the UDR and FN. These load/strength ratios more closely simulated patterns of wrist and hip fractures occurring in the same population than did measurement of vBMD. Introduction: Areal BMD measurements, although associated with fracture risk, incompletely explain patterns of fragility fractures. Moreover, population-based assessments relating applied loads and whole bone strength to fracture patterns have not been made. Materials and Methods: Using QCT, we assessed volumetric BMD (vBMD), cross-sectional geometry, and axial (EA) and flexural (EI) rigidities (indices of bone's resistance to compressive and bending loads, respectively) at the ultradistal radius (UDR) and femoral neck (FN) and estimated the loads applied to the wrist and hip during a fall. We used fall load (FL)/bone strength ratios to estimate fracture risk. Results: vBMD in young adults was similar between sexes. Decreases in vBMD over life were also similar (30{\%} and 28{\%}) at UDR but were somewhat greater (46{\%} and 34{\%}) at FN in women versus men, respectively. In young adults, FL/strength ratios at UDR were 32-51 {\%} lower (better) in men than in women and increased (worsened) over life less in men (+4{\%} to +22{\%}) than in women (+20{\%} to +33{\%}). In young adults, FL/strength ratios at FN were only marginally better in men than in women but worsened less over life in men (+22{\%} to +36{\%}) than in women (+40{\%} to +62{\%}). Conclusions: The 6:1 female preponderance and the virtual immunity of men for age-related increases in wrist fractures are largely explained by the more favorable FL/strength ratios at UDR in young adult men (because of larger bone size and more favorable geometry) versus women and to maintaining this advantage over life. The 2-fold lower incidence of hip fractures in men versus women is largely explained by age-related increases (worsening) of FL/bone strength ratios that are only one-half of the increases in women. The moderate increases in these ratios with aging are insufficient to explain the >4-fold increase in hip fracture incidence after age 75 in both sexes, suggesting contributions of other factors, especially the well-documented increased frequency of injurious falls among the elderly.",
keywords = "Bone quality, Falls, Osteoporosis",
author = "Riggs, {B. Lawrence} and Melton, {L. Joseph} and Robb, {Richard A.} and Camp, {Jon J.} and Atkinson, {Elizabeth J.} and Oberg, {Ann L} and Rouleau, {Peggy A.} and McCollough, {Cynthia H} and Sundeep Khosla and Bouxsein, {Mary L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1359/JBMR.051022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "315--323",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Mineral Research",
issn = "0884-0431",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Population-based analysis of the relationship of whole bone strength indices and fall-related loads to age- and sex-specific patterns of hip and wrist fractures

AU - Riggs, B. Lawrence

AU - Melton, L. Joseph

AU - Robb, Richard A.

AU - Camp, Jon J.

AU - Atkinson, Elizabeth J.

AU - Oberg, Ann L

AU - Rouleau, Peggy A.

AU - McCollough, Cynthia H

AU - Khosla, Sundeep

AU - Bouxsein, Mary L.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - In an age- and sex-stratified population sample (n = 700), we estimated fall-related loads and bone strength indices at the UDR and FN. These load/strength ratios more closely simulated patterns of wrist and hip fractures occurring in the same population than did measurement of vBMD. Introduction: Areal BMD measurements, although associated with fracture risk, incompletely explain patterns of fragility fractures. Moreover, population-based assessments relating applied loads and whole bone strength to fracture patterns have not been made. Materials and Methods: Using QCT, we assessed volumetric BMD (vBMD), cross-sectional geometry, and axial (EA) and flexural (EI) rigidities (indices of bone's resistance to compressive and bending loads, respectively) at the ultradistal radius (UDR) and femoral neck (FN) and estimated the loads applied to the wrist and hip during a fall. We used fall load (FL)/bone strength ratios to estimate fracture risk. Results: vBMD in young adults was similar between sexes. Decreases in vBMD over life were also similar (30% and 28%) at UDR but were somewhat greater (46% and 34%) at FN in women versus men, respectively. In young adults, FL/strength ratios at UDR were 32-51 % lower (better) in men than in women and increased (worsened) over life less in men (+4% to +22%) than in women (+20% to +33%). In young adults, FL/strength ratios at FN were only marginally better in men than in women but worsened less over life in men (+22% to +36%) than in women (+40% to +62%). Conclusions: The 6:1 female preponderance and the virtual immunity of men for age-related increases in wrist fractures are largely explained by the more favorable FL/strength ratios at UDR in young adult men (because of larger bone size and more favorable geometry) versus women and to maintaining this advantage over life. The 2-fold lower incidence of hip fractures in men versus women is largely explained by age-related increases (worsening) of FL/bone strength ratios that are only one-half of the increases in women. The moderate increases in these ratios with aging are insufficient to explain the >4-fold increase in hip fracture incidence after age 75 in both sexes, suggesting contributions of other factors, especially the well-documented increased frequency of injurious falls among the elderly.

AB - In an age- and sex-stratified population sample (n = 700), we estimated fall-related loads and bone strength indices at the UDR and FN. These load/strength ratios more closely simulated patterns of wrist and hip fractures occurring in the same population than did measurement of vBMD. Introduction: Areal BMD measurements, although associated with fracture risk, incompletely explain patterns of fragility fractures. Moreover, population-based assessments relating applied loads and whole bone strength to fracture patterns have not been made. Materials and Methods: Using QCT, we assessed volumetric BMD (vBMD), cross-sectional geometry, and axial (EA) and flexural (EI) rigidities (indices of bone's resistance to compressive and bending loads, respectively) at the ultradistal radius (UDR) and femoral neck (FN) and estimated the loads applied to the wrist and hip during a fall. We used fall load (FL)/bone strength ratios to estimate fracture risk. Results: vBMD in young adults was similar between sexes. Decreases in vBMD over life were also similar (30% and 28%) at UDR but were somewhat greater (46% and 34%) at FN in women versus men, respectively. In young adults, FL/strength ratios at UDR were 32-51 % lower (better) in men than in women and increased (worsened) over life less in men (+4% to +22%) than in women (+20% to +33%). In young adults, FL/strength ratios at FN were only marginally better in men than in women but worsened less over life in men (+22% to +36%) than in women (+40% to +62%). Conclusions: The 6:1 female preponderance and the virtual immunity of men for age-related increases in wrist fractures are largely explained by the more favorable FL/strength ratios at UDR in young adult men (because of larger bone size and more favorable geometry) versus women and to maintaining this advantage over life. The 2-fold lower incidence of hip fractures in men versus women is largely explained by age-related increases (worsening) of FL/bone strength ratios that are only one-half of the increases in women. The moderate increases in these ratios with aging are insufficient to explain the >4-fold increase in hip fracture incidence after age 75 in both sexes, suggesting contributions of other factors, especially the well-documented increased frequency of injurious falls among the elderly.

KW - Bone quality

KW - Falls

KW - Osteoporosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33144479729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33144479729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1359/JBMR.051022

DO - 10.1359/JBMR.051022

M3 - Article

C2 - 16418788

AN - SCOPUS:33144479729

VL - 21

SP - 315

EP - 323

JO - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

JF - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

SN - 0884-0431

IS - 2

ER -