Poly(Propylene Fumarate)-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Can Be a Suitable Candidate for Cervical Cages

Yong Teng, Hugo Giambini, Asghar Rezaei, Xifeng Liu, A. Lee Miller, Brian E. Waletzki, Lichun Lu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A wide range of materials have been used for the development of intervertebral cages. Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) has been shown to be an excellent biomaterial with characteristics similar to trabecular bone. Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been shown to enhance biocompatibility and mechanical properties of PPF. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effect of PPF augmented with HA (PPF:HA) and evaluate the feasibility of this material for the development of cervical cages. PPF was synthesized and combined with HA at PPF:HA wt:wt ratios of 100:0, 80:20, 70:30, and 60:40. Molds were fabricated for testing PPF:HA bulk materials in compression, bending, tension, and hardness according to ASTM standards, and also for cage preparation. The cages were fabricated with and without holes and with porosity created by salt leaching. The samples as well as the cages were mechanically tested using a materials testing frame. All elastic moduli as well as the hardness increased significantly by adding HA to PPF (p<0.0001). The 20 wt % HA increased the moduli significantly compared to pure PPF (p<0.0001). Compressive stiffness of all cages also increased with the addition of HA. HA increased the failure load of the porous cages significantly (p=0.0018) compared with nonporous cages. PPF:HA wt:wt ratio of 80:20 proved to be significantly stiffer and stronger than pure PPF. The current results suggest that this polymeric composite can be a suitable candidate material for intervertebral body cages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101009
JournalJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
Volume140
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nanocomposites
Fumarates
Durapatite
Hydroxyapatite
Polypropylenes
Propylene
Hardness
poly(propylene fumarate)
propylene
Materials Testing
Materials testing
Elastic Modulus
Porosity
Molds
Biocompatible Materials
Biocompatibility
Biomaterials
Leaching
Bone
Compaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Poly(Propylene Fumarate)-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Can Be a Suitable Candidate for Cervical Cages. / Teng, Yong; Giambini, Hugo; Rezaei, Asghar; Liu, Xifeng; Miller, A. Lee; Waletzki, Brian E.; Lu, Lichun.

In: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 140, No. 10, 101009, 01.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Teng, Yong ; Giambini, Hugo ; Rezaei, Asghar ; Liu, Xifeng ; Miller, A. Lee ; Waletzki, Brian E. ; Lu, Lichun. / Poly(Propylene Fumarate)-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Can Be a Suitable Candidate for Cervical Cages. In: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2018 ; Vol. 140, No. 10.
@article{74b1046a95e34429bd7caee199881c25,
title = "Poly(Propylene Fumarate)-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Can Be a Suitable Candidate for Cervical Cages",
abstract = "A wide range of materials have been used for the development of intervertebral cages. Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) has been shown to be an excellent biomaterial with characteristics similar to trabecular bone. Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been shown to enhance biocompatibility and mechanical properties of PPF. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effect of PPF augmented with HA (PPF:HA) and evaluate the feasibility of this material for the development of cervical cages. PPF was synthesized and combined with HA at PPF:HA wt:wt ratios of 100:0, 80:20, 70:30, and 60:40. Molds were fabricated for testing PPF:HA bulk materials in compression, bending, tension, and hardness according to ASTM standards, and also for cage preparation. The cages were fabricated with and without holes and with porosity created by salt leaching. The samples as well as the cages were mechanically tested using a materials testing frame. All elastic moduli as well as the hardness increased significantly by adding HA to PPF (p<0.0001). The 20 wt {\%} HA increased the moduli significantly compared to pure PPF (p<0.0001). Compressive stiffness of all cages also increased with the addition of HA. HA increased the failure load of the porous cages significantly (p=0.0018) compared with nonporous cages. PPF:HA wt:wt ratio of 80:20 proved to be significantly stiffer and stronger than pure PPF. The current results suggest that this polymeric composite can be a suitable candidate material for intervertebral body cages.",
author = "Yong Teng and Hugo Giambini and Asghar Rezaei and Xifeng Liu and Miller, {A. Lee} and Waletzki, {Brian E.} and Lichun Lu",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.4040458",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanical Engineering",
issn = "0148-0731",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poly(Propylene Fumarate)-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Can Be a Suitable Candidate for Cervical Cages

AU - Teng, Yong

AU - Giambini, Hugo

AU - Rezaei, Asghar

AU - Liu, Xifeng

AU - Miller, A. Lee

AU - Waletzki, Brian E.

AU - Lu, Lichun

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - A wide range of materials have been used for the development of intervertebral cages. Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) has been shown to be an excellent biomaterial with characteristics similar to trabecular bone. Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been shown to enhance biocompatibility and mechanical properties of PPF. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effect of PPF augmented with HA (PPF:HA) and evaluate the feasibility of this material for the development of cervical cages. PPF was synthesized and combined with HA at PPF:HA wt:wt ratios of 100:0, 80:20, 70:30, and 60:40. Molds were fabricated for testing PPF:HA bulk materials in compression, bending, tension, and hardness according to ASTM standards, and also for cage preparation. The cages were fabricated with and without holes and with porosity created by salt leaching. The samples as well as the cages were mechanically tested using a materials testing frame. All elastic moduli as well as the hardness increased significantly by adding HA to PPF (p<0.0001). The 20 wt % HA increased the moduli significantly compared to pure PPF (p<0.0001). Compressive stiffness of all cages also increased with the addition of HA. HA increased the failure load of the porous cages significantly (p=0.0018) compared with nonporous cages. PPF:HA wt:wt ratio of 80:20 proved to be significantly stiffer and stronger than pure PPF. The current results suggest that this polymeric composite can be a suitable candidate material for intervertebral body cages.

AB - A wide range of materials have been used for the development of intervertebral cages. Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) has been shown to be an excellent biomaterial with characteristics similar to trabecular bone. Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been shown to enhance biocompatibility and mechanical properties of PPF. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effect of PPF augmented with HA (PPF:HA) and evaluate the feasibility of this material for the development of cervical cages. PPF was synthesized and combined with HA at PPF:HA wt:wt ratios of 100:0, 80:20, 70:30, and 60:40. Molds were fabricated for testing PPF:HA bulk materials in compression, bending, tension, and hardness according to ASTM standards, and also for cage preparation. The cages were fabricated with and without holes and with porosity created by salt leaching. The samples as well as the cages were mechanically tested using a materials testing frame. All elastic moduli as well as the hardness increased significantly by adding HA to PPF (p<0.0001). The 20 wt % HA increased the moduli significantly compared to pure PPF (p<0.0001). Compressive stiffness of all cages also increased with the addition of HA. HA increased the failure load of the porous cages significantly (p=0.0018) compared with nonporous cages. PPF:HA wt:wt ratio of 80:20 proved to be significantly stiffer and stronger than pure PPF. The current results suggest that this polymeric composite can be a suitable candidate material for intervertebral body cages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050690311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050690311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.4040458

DO - 10.1115/1.4040458

M3 - Article

C2 - 30029248

AN - SCOPUS:85050690311

VL - 140

JO - Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

JF - Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

SN - 0148-0731

IS - 10

M1 - 101009

ER -