Polyp volume versus linear size measurements at CT colonography: Implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions

Perry J. Pickhardt, Vance T Lehman, Thomas C. Winter, Andrew J. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Proposed surveillance of unresected medium-sized (6.0-9.9 mm) polyps will require reliable detection of small incremental changes. The purpose of this study was to assess the reproducibility of linear versus volume measurements of polyp size at CT colonography (CTC) and to correlate results with a hemispheric model. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study group consisted of 30 polyps on supine and prone CTC data sets. Measurements were performed separately by two experienced radiologists using the same CTC system (Vitrea 2), resulting in 120 linear and volume measurements. Linear size was defined as the longest dimension among the 2D multiplanar reconstruction views. Semiautomated volume determination required manual tracing of polyp boundaries on 2D multiplanar reconstruction views. The relative error between reviewers 1 and 2 was defined as 100 x (|D1 - D2|) / Dave for linear size (D) and as 100 x (|V1 - V2|) / Vave for volume (V), where ave is average. RESULTS. The mean relative error for linear size and volume measurement was 10.4% ± 10.7% and 16.9% ± 13.2%, respectively. Median linear size and volume of polyps were 9.4 mm and 270 mm3, respectively. CTC-derived volumes for medium-sized polyps closely approximated hemispheric volume (V = (π / 12) x Db, where b = 3.13, r2 = 0.90). Small incremental changes in hemispheric size result in a 3:1 relative change in volume versus diameter, such that a 1-mm diameter change in a medium-sized hemispheric polyp results in a relative change in linear size and volume ranging from approximately 11-18% and 31-53%, respectively. CONCLUSION. Because changes in polyp volume are amplified compared with linear dimension, volume measurement rather than diameter measurement will better allow detection of small incremental changes in polyp size using CTC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1605-1610
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume186
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Computed Tomographic Colonography
Polyps
Birds

Keywords

  • Colon
  • Colonography
  • CT technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Polyp volume versus linear size measurements at CT colonography : Implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions. / Pickhardt, Perry J.; Lehman, Vance T; Winter, Thomas C.; Taylor, Andrew J.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 186, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 1605-1610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee4a0b154ac645d1a77dfa0ee54a48e2,
title = "Polyp volume versus linear size measurements at CT colonography: Implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. Proposed surveillance of unresected medium-sized (6.0-9.9 mm) polyps will require reliable detection of small incremental changes. The purpose of this study was to assess the reproducibility of linear versus volume measurements of polyp size at CT colonography (CTC) and to correlate results with a hemispheric model. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study group consisted of 30 polyps on supine and prone CTC data sets. Measurements were performed separately by two experienced radiologists using the same CTC system (Vitrea 2), resulting in 120 linear and volume measurements. Linear size was defined as the longest dimension among the 2D multiplanar reconstruction views. Semiautomated volume determination required manual tracing of polyp boundaries on 2D multiplanar reconstruction views. The relative error between reviewers 1 and 2 was defined as 100 x (|D1 - D2|) / Dave for linear size (D) and as 100 x (|V1 - V2|) / Vave for volume (V), where ave is average. RESULTS. The mean relative error for linear size and volume measurement was 10.4{\%} ± 10.7{\%} and 16.9{\%} ± 13.2{\%}, respectively. Median linear size and volume of polyps were 9.4 mm and 270 mm3, respectively. CTC-derived volumes for medium-sized polyps closely approximated hemispheric volume (V = (π / 12) x Db, where b = 3.13, r2 = 0.90). Small incremental changes in hemispheric size result in a 3:1 relative change in volume versus diameter, such that a 1-mm diameter change in a medium-sized hemispheric polyp results in a relative change in linear size and volume ranging from approximately 11-18{\%} and 31-53{\%}, respectively. CONCLUSION. Because changes in polyp volume are amplified compared with linear dimension, volume measurement rather than diameter measurement will better allow detection of small incremental changes in polyp size using CTC.",
keywords = "Colon, Colonography, CT technique",
author = "Pickhardt, {Perry J.} and Lehman, {Vance T} and Winter, {Thomas C.} and Taylor, {Andrew J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.05.0760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "186",
pages = "1605--1610",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Polyp volume versus linear size measurements at CT colonography

T2 - Implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions

AU - Pickhardt, Perry J.

AU - Lehman, Vance T

AU - Winter, Thomas C.

AU - Taylor, Andrew J.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - OBJECTIVE. Proposed surveillance of unresected medium-sized (6.0-9.9 mm) polyps will require reliable detection of small incremental changes. The purpose of this study was to assess the reproducibility of linear versus volume measurements of polyp size at CT colonography (CTC) and to correlate results with a hemispheric model. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study group consisted of 30 polyps on supine and prone CTC data sets. Measurements were performed separately by two experienced radiologists using the same CTC system (Vitrea 2), resulting in 120 linear and volume measurements. Linear size was defined as the longest dimension among the 2D multiplanar reconstruction views. Semiautomated volume determination required manual tracing of polyp boundaries on 2D multiplanar reconstruction views. The relative error between reviewers 1 and 2 was defined as 100 x (|D1 - D2|) / Dave for linear size (D) and as 100 x (|V1 - V2|) / Vave for volume (V), where ave is average. RESULTS. The mean relative error for linear size and volume measurement was 10.4% ± 10.7% and 16.9% ± 13.2%, respectively. Median linear size and volume of polyps were 9.4 mm and 270 mm3, respectively. CTC-derived volumes for medium-sized polyps closely approximated hemispheric volume (V = (π / 12) x Db, where b = 3.13, r2 = 0.90). Small incremental changes in hemispheric size result in a 3:1 relative change in volume versus diameter, such that a 1-mm diameter change in a medium-sized hemispheric polyp results in a relative change in linear size and volume ranging from approximately 11-18% and 31-53%, respectively. CONCLUSION. Because changes in polyp volume are amplified compared with linear dimension, volume measurement rather than diameter measurement will better allow detection of small incremental changes in polyp size using CTC.

AB - OBJECTIVE. Proposed surveillance of unresected medium-sized (6.0-9.9 mm) polyps will require reliable detection of small incremental changes. The purpose of this study was to assess the reproducibility of linear versus volume measurements of polyp size at CT colonography (CTC) and to correlate results with a hemispheric model. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study group consisted of 30 polyps on supine and prone CTC data sets. Measurements were performed separately by two experienced radiologists using the same CTC system (Vitrea 2), resulting in 120 linear and volume measurements. Linear size was defined as the longest dimension among the 2D multiplanar reconstruction views. Semiautomated volume determination required manual tracing of polyp boundaries on 2D multiplanar reconstruction views. The relative error between reviewers 1 and 2 was defined as 100 x (|D1 - D2|) / Dave for linear size (D) and as 100 x (|V1 - V2|) / Vave for volume (V), where ave is average. RESULTS. The mean relative error for linear size and volume measurement was 10.4% ± 10.7% and 16.9% ± 13.2%, respectively. Median linear size and volume of polyps were 9.4 mm and 270 mm3, respectively. CTC-derived volumes for medium-sized polyps closely approximated hemispheric volume (V = (π / 12) x Db, where b = 3.13, r2 = 0.90). Small incremental changes in hemispheric size result in a 3:1 relative change in volume versus diameter, such that a 1-mm diameter change in a medium-sized hemispheric polyp results in a relative change in linear size and volume ranging from approximately 11-18% and 31-53%, respectively. CONCLUSION. Because changes in polyp volume are amplified compared with linear dimension, volume measurement rather than diameter measurement will better allow detection of small incremental changes in polyp size using CTC.

KW - Colon

KW - Colonography

KW - CT technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745493775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745493775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.05.0760

DO - 10.2214/AJR.05.0760

M3 - Article

C2 - 16714649

AN - SCOPUS:33745493775

VL - 186

SP - 1605

EP - 1610

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 6

ER -