Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon

Erika S. Boroff, Suryakanth R. Gurudu, Joseph G. Hentz, Jonathan A Leighton, Francisco C Ramirez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:Little is known about the correlation between the polyp detection rate (PDR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in individual colonic segments. The adenoma-to-polyp detection rate quotient (APDRQ) has been utilized in retrospective study as a constant to estimate ADR from PDR. It has been previously stated that diminutive polyps in the rectum are more likely to be non-adenomatous, compared with more proximal segments, yet the APDRQ uses data from the entire colon. We sought to characterize and compare ADR and PDR in each colonic segment, estimate ADR using the conversion factor, APDRQ, and assess the correlation between estimated and actual ADR for each colonic segment.METHODS:As part of a quality improvement program, a retrospective chart review was conducted of all outpatient colonoscopies performed by 20 gastroenterologists between 1 October 2010 and 31 March 2011 at a single academic tertiary-care referral center. PDR, ADR, and the APDRQ were calculated for each gastroenterologist, using data from the entire colon and then for each colonic segment separately. Actual ADR was compared with estimated ADR based on the measured APDRQ.RESULTS:During 1,921 colonoscopies, 2,285 polyps were removed; 1,122 (49%) were adenomas. The mean (s.d.) PDR for the group was 49% (12.4%) (range, 16-64%). The mean (s.d.) ADR was 31% (7.4%) (range, 13-42%). PDR and ADR correlated well in segments proximal to the splenic flexure, but diverged in distal segments. ADR was significantly higher in the right colon (17.1%) than in the left (13.5%) (P=0.001). The correlation between estimated and actual ADR using the APDRQ was significantly higher in the right colon (r=0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.98)) than in the left (r=0.59 (95% CI, 0.17-0.83)) (P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Although PDR and ADR correlate well in segments proximal to the splenic flexure, they do not correlate well in the left colon. Caution should be exercised when using PDR as a surrogate for ADR if data from the rectum and sigmoid are included.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)993-999
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume108
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Polyps
Adenoma
Colon
Transverse Colon
Colonoscopy
Rectum
Tertiary Care Centers
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon. / Boroff, Erika S.; Gurudu, Suryakanth R.; Hentz, Joseph G.; Leighton, Jonathan A; Ramirez, Francisco C.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 108, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 993-999.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boroff, Erika S. ; Gurudu, Suryakanth R. ; Hentz, Joseph G. ; Leighton, Jonathan A ; Ramirez, Francisco C. / Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon. In: American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013 ; Vol. 108, No. 6. pp. 993-999.
@article{5ce20501ae824668a3bc5635abb2f327,
title = "Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES:Little is known about the correlation between the polyp detection rate (PDR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in individual colonic segments. The adenoma-to-polyp detection rate quotient (APDRQ) has been utilized in retrospective study as a constant to estimate ADR from PDR. It has been previously stated that diminutive polyps in the rectum are more likely to be non-adenomatous, compared with more proximal segments, yet the APDRQ uses data from the entire colon. We sought to characterize and compare ADR and PDR in each colonic segment, estimate ADR using the conversion factor, APDRQ, and assess the correlation between estimated and actual ADR for each colonic segment.METHODS:As part of a quality improvement program, a retrospective chart review was conducted of all outpatient colonoscopies performed by 20 gastroenterologists between 1 October 2010 and 31 March 2011 at a single academic tertiary-care referral center. PDR, ADR, and the APDRQ were calculated for each gastroenterologist, using data from the entire colon and then for each colonic segment separately. Actual ADR was compared with estimated ADR based on the measured APDRQ.RESULTS:During 1,921 colonoscopies, 2,285 polyps were removed; 1,122 (49{\%}) were adenomas. The mean (s.d.) PDR for the group was 49{\%} (12.4{\%}) (range, 16-64{\%}). The mean (s.d.) ADR was 31{\%} (7.4{\%}) (range, 13-42{\%}). PDR and ADR correlated well in segments proximal to the splenic flexure, but diverged in distal segments. ADR was significantly higher in the right colon (17.1{\%}) than in the left (13.5{\%}) (P=0.001). The correlation between estimated and actual ADR using the APDRQ was significantly higher in the right colon (r=0.95 (95{\%} confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.98)) than in the left (r=0.59 (95{\%} CI, 0.17-0.83)) (P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Although PDR and ADR correlate well in segments proximal to the splenic flexure, they do not correlate well in the left colon. Caution should be exercised when using PDR as a surrogate for ADR if data from the rectum and sigmoid are included.",
author = "Boroff, {Erika S.} and Gurudu, {Suryakanth R.} and Hentz, {Joseph G.} and Leighton, {Jonathan A} and Ramirez, {Francisco C}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1038/ajg.2013.68",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "993--999",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon

AU - Boroff, Erika S.

AU - Gurudu, Suryakanth R.

AU - Hentz, Joseph G.

AU - Leighton, Jonathan A

AU - Ramirez, Francisco C

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - OBJECTIVES:Little is known about the correlation between the polyp detection rate (PDR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in individual colonic segments. The adenoma-to-polyp detection rate quotient (APDRQ) has been utilized in retrospective study as a constant to estimate ADR from PDR. It has been previously stated that diminutive polyps in the rectum are more likely to be non-adenomatous, compared with more proximal segments, yet the APDRQ uses data from the entire colon. We sought to characterize and compare ADR and PDR in each colonic segment, estimate ADR using the conversion factor, APDRQ, and assess the correlation between estimated and actual ADR for each colonic segment.METHODS:As part of a quality improvement program, a retrospective chart review was conducted of all outpatient colonoscopies performed by 20 gastroenterologists between 1 October 2010 and 31 March 2011 at a single academic tertiary-care referral center. PDR, ADR, and the APDRQ were calculated for each gastroenterologist, using data from the entire colon and then for each colonic segment separately. Actual ADR was compared with estimated ADR based on the measured APDRQ.RESULTS:During 1,921 colonoscopies, 2,285 polyps were removed; 1,122 (49%) were adenomas. The mean (s.d.) PDR for the group was 49% (12.4%) (range, 16-64%). The mean (s.d.) ADR was 31% (7.4%) (range, 13-42%). PDR and ADR correlated well in segments proximal to the splenic flexure, but diverged in distal segments. ADR was significantly higher in the right colon (17.1%) than in the left (13.5%) (P=0.001). The correlation between estimated and actual ADR using the APDRQ was significantly higher in the right colon (r=0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.98)) than in the left (r=0.59 (95% CI, 0.17-0.83)) (P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Although PDR and ADR correlate well in segments proximal to the splenic flexure, they do not correlate well in the left colon. Caution should be exercised when using PDR as a surrogate for ADR if data from the rectum and sigmoid are included.

AB - OBJECTIVES:Little is known about the correlation between the polyp detection rate (PDR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in individual colonic segments. The adenoma-to-polyp detection rate quotient (APDRQ) has been utilized in retrospective study as a constant to estimate ADR from PDR. It has been previously stated that diminutive polyps in the rectum are more likely to be non-adenomatous, compared with more proximal segments, yet the APDRQ uses data from the entire colon. We sought to characterize and compare ADR and PDR in each colonic segment, estimate ADR using the conversion factor, APDRQ, and assess the correlation between estimated and actual ADR for each colonic segment.METHODS:As part of a quality improvement program, a retrospective chart review was conducted of all outpatient colonoscopies performed by 20 gastroenterologists between 1 October 2010 and 31 March 2011 at a single academic tertiary-care referral center. PDR, ADR, and the APDRQ were calculated for each gastroenterologist, using data from the entire colon and then for each colonic segment separately. Actual ADR was compared with estimated ADR based on the measured APDRQ.RESULTS:During 1,921 colonoscopies, 2,285 polyps were removed; 1,122 (49%) were adenomas. The mean (s.d.) PDR for the group was 49% (12.4%) (range, 16-64%). The mean (s.d.) ADR was 31% (7.4%) (range, 13-42%). PDR and ADR correlated well in segments proximal to the splenic flexure, but diverged in distal segments. ADR was significantly higher in the right colon (17.1%) than in the left (13.5%) (P=0.001). The correlation between estimated and actual ADR using the APDRQ was significantly higher in the right colon (r=0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.98)) than in the left (r=0.59 (95% CI, 0.17-0.83)) (P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Although PDR and ADR correlate well in segments proximal to the splenic flexure, they do not correlate well in the left colon. Caution should be exercised when using PDR as a surrogate for ADR if data from the rectum and sigmoid are included.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878907404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878907404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ajg.2013.68

DO - 10.1038/ajg.2013.68

M3 - Article

C2 - 23567353

AN - SCOPUS:84878907404

VL - 108

SP - 993

EP - 999

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 6

ER -