Playing hide-and-seek with the tobacco industry

Eric M. LeGresley, Monique E. Muggli, Richard D. Hurt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite many peer-reviewed works that draw on tobacco industry documents that have now been made public, questions remain about how complete a picture has emerged. We present a conceptual framework that identifies and evaluates tobacco industry efforts to conceal information. Widespread document destruction like that in recent litigation in Australia is just one of more than a dozen tobacco industry efforts to prevent access, or at least timely access, to documents. Industry efforts range from small, locally employed initiatives to company-wide tactics. Some efforts, such as using "oral only" procedures, scrambling telephone lines, or involving lawyers in scientific projects, are preemptive. Others seek to deal with already existing documents by invoking bogus claims of legal privilege, stipulating "read then destroy" for memos, and rewriting problematic memos. That evidence of concealment has, in fact, been found in tobacco company archives attests to the futility of attempting to control the flow of millions of pieces of paper among tens of thousands of employees. However, researchers have yet to reveal the full story: We know of the industry's failures in concealing information, but not its successes. The industry's objective is not destruction of information per se, but prevention of public disclosure of that information. Exposing the tobacco industry's many approaches to concealment provides greater insight into companies' intentions and potential means for stripping away that concealment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-40
Number of pages14
JournalNicotine and Tobacco Research
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2005

Fingerprint

Tobacco Industry
Industry
Medical Futility
Lawyers
Disclosure
Jurisprudence
Telephone
Tobacco
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Playing hide-and-seek with the tobacco industry. / LeGresley, Eric M.; Muggli, Monique E.; Hurt, Richard D.

In: Nicotine and Tobacco Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, 02.2005, p. 27-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LeGresley, Eric M. ; Muggli, Monique E. ; Hurt, Richard D. / Playing hide-and-seek with the tobacco industry. In: Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 27-40.
@article{6c8a52b4186047eab22d1abdd98bdc83,
title = "Playing hide-and-seek with the tobacco industry",
abstract = "Despite many peer-reviewed works that draw on tobacco industry documents that have now been made public, questions remain about how complete a picture has emerged. We present a conceptual framework that identifies and evaluates tobacco industry efforts to conceal information. Widespread document destruction like that in recent litigation in Australia is just one of more than a dozen tobacco industry efforts to prevent access, or at least timely access, to documents. Industry efforts range from small, locally employed initiatives to company-wide tactics. Some efforts, such as using {"}oral only{"} procedures, scrambling telephone lines, or involving lawyers in scientific projects, are preemptive. Others seek to deal with already existing documents by invoking bogus claims of legal privilege, stipulating {"}read then destroy{"} for memos, and rewriting problematic memos. That evidence of concealment has, in fact, been found in tobacco company archives attests to the futility of attempting to control the flow of millions of pieces of paper among tens of thousands of employees. However, researchers have yet to reveal the full story: We know of the industry's failures in concealing information, but not its successes. The industry's objective is not destruction of information per se, but prevention of public disclosure of that information. Exposing the tobacco industry's many approaches to concealment provides greater insight into companies' intentions and potential means for stripping away that concealment.",
author = "LeGresley, {Eric M.} and Muggli, {Monique E.} and Hurt, {Richard D.}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14622200412331328529",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "27--40",
journal = "Nicotine and Tobacco Research",
issn = "1462-2203",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Playing hide-and-seek with the tobacco industry

AU - LeGresley, Eric M.

AU - Muggli, Monique E.

AU - Hurt, Richard D.

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - Despite many peer-reviewed works that draw on tobacco industry documents that have now been made public, questions remain about how complete a picture has emerged. We present a conceptual framework that identifies and evaluates tobacco industry efforts to conceal information. Widespread document destruction like that in recent litigation in Australia is just one of more than a dozen tobacco industry efforts to prevent access, or at least timely access, to documents. Industry efforts range from small, locally employed initiatives to company-wide tactics. Some efforts, such as using "oral only" procedures, scrambling telephone lines, or involving lawyers in scientific projects, are preemptive. Others seek to deal with already existing documents by invoking bogus claims of legal privilege, stipulating "read then destroy" for memos, and rewriting problematic memos. That evidence of concealment has, in fact, been found in tobacco company archives attests to the futility of attempting to control the flow of millions of pieces of paper among tens of thousands of employees. However, researchers have yet to reveal the full story: We know of the industry's failures in concealing information, but not its successes. The industry's objective is not destruction of information per se, but prevention of public disclosure of that information. Exposing the tobacco industry's many approaches to concealment provides greater insight into companies' intentions and potential means for stripping away that concealment.

AB - Despite many peer-reviewed works that draw on tobacco industry documents that have now been made public, questions remain about how complete a picture has emerged. We present a conceptual framework that identifies and evaluates tobacco industry efforts to conceal information. Widespread document destruction like that in recent litigation in Australia is just one of more than a dozen tobacco industry efforts to prevent access, or at least timely access, to documents. Industry efforts range from small, locally employed initiatives to company-wide tactics. Some efforts, such as using "oral only" procedures, scrambling telephone lines, or involving lawyers in scientific projects, are preemptive. Others seek to deal with already existing documents by invoking bogus claims of legal privilege, stipulating "read then destroy" for memos, and rewriting problematic memos. That evidence of concealment has, in fact, been found in tobacco company archives attests to the futility of attempting to control the flow of millions of pieces of paper among tens of thousands of employees. However, researchers have yet to reveal the full story: We know of the industry's failures in concealing information, but not its successes. The industry's objective is not destruction of information per se, but prevention of public disclosure of that information. Exposing the tobacco industry's many approaches to concealment provides greater insight into companies' intentions and potential means for stripping away that concealment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18144418136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18144418136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14622200412331328529

DO - 10.1080/14622200412331328529

M3 - Article

C2 - 15804675

AN - SCOPUS:18144418136

VL - 7

SP - 27

EP - 40

JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research

JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research

SN - 1462-2203

IS - 1

ER -