Plaque characterization using shear wave elastography - Evaluation of differentiability and accuracy using a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup

David Marlevi, Elira Maksuti, Matthew W Urban, Reidar Winter, Matilda Larsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Ultrasound elastography has shown potential for improved plaque risk stratification. However, no clear consensus exists on what output metric to use, or what imaging parameters would render optimal plaque differentiation. For this reason we developed a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup, in which the ability to differentiate phantom plaques of varying stiffness was evaluated as a function of plaque geometry, push location, imaging plane, and analysed wave speed metric. The results indicate that group velocity or phase velocity 1 kHz showed the highest ability to significantly differentiate plaques of different stiffness, successfully classifying a majority of the 24 analysed plaque geometries, respectively. The ability to differentiate plaques was also better in the longitudinal views than in the transverse view. Group velocity as well as phase velocities <1 kHz showed a systematic underestimation of plaque stiffness, stemming from the confined plaque geometries, however, despite this group velocity analysis showed lowest deviation in estimated plaque stiffness (0.1 m s-1 compared to 0.2 m s-1 for phase velocity analysis). SWE results were also invariant to SWE push location, albeit apparent differences in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and generated plaque particle velocity. With that, the study has reinforced the potential of SWE for successful plaque differentiation; however the results also highlight the importance of choosing optimal imaging settings and using an appropriate wave speed metric when attempting to differentiate different plaque groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number235008
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume63
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 23 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Elasticity Imaging Techniques
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • atherosclerosis
  • elastography
  • plaque characterization
  • shear wave elastography
  • ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Plaque characterization using shear wave elastography - Evaluation of differentiability and accuracy using a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup. / Marlevi, David; Maksuti, Elira; Urban, Matthew W; Winter, Reidar; Larsson, Matilda.

In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 63, No. 23, 235008, 23.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b239f12aa9c4842b51780f795c80c45,
title = "Plaque characterization using shear wave elastography - Evaluation of differentiability and accuracy using a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup",
abstract = "Ultrasound elastography has shown potential for improved plaque risk stratification. However, no clear consensus exists on what output metric to use, or what imaging parameters would render optimal plaque differentiation. For this reason we developed a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup, in which the ability to differentiate phantom plaques of varying stiffness was evaluated as a function of plaque geometry, push location, imaging plane, and analysed wave speed metric. The results indicate that group velocity or phase velocity 1 kHz showed the highest ability to significantly differentiate plaques of different stiffness, successfully classifying a majority of the 24 analysed plaque geometries, respectively. The ability to differentiate plaques was also better in the longitudinal views than in the transverse view. Group velocity as well as phase velocities <1 kHz showed a systematic underestimation of plaque stiffness, stemming from the confined plaque geometries, however, despite this group velocity analysis showed lowest deviation in estimated plaque stiffness (0.1 m s-1 compared to 0.2 m s-1 for phase velocity analysis). SWE results were also invariant to SWE push location, albeit apparent differences in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and generated plaque particle velocity. With that, the study has reinforced the potential of SWE for successful plaque differentiation; however the results also highlight the importance of choosing optimal imaging settings and using an appropriate wave speed metric when attempting to differentiate different plaque groups.",
keywords = "atherosclerosis, elastography, plaque characterization, shear wave elastography, ultrasound",
author = "David Marlevi and Elira Maksuti and Urban, {Matthew W} and Reidar Winter and Matilda Larsson",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1088/1361-6560/aaec2b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plaque characterization using shear wave elastography - Evaluation of differentiability and accuracy using a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup

AU - Marlevi, David

AU - Maksuti, Elira

AU - Urban, Matthew W

AU - Winter, Reidar

AU - Larsson, Matilda

PY - 2018/11/23

Y1 - 2018/11/23

N2 - Ultrasound elastography has shown potential for improved plaque risk stratification. However, no clear consensus exists on what output metric to use, or what imaging parameters would render optimal plaque differentiation. For this reason we developed a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup, in which the ability to differentiate phantom plaques of varying stiffness was evaluated as a function of plaque geometry, push location, imaging plane, and analysed wave speed metric. The results indicate that group velocity or phase velocity 1 kHz showed the highest ability to significantly differentiate plaques of different stiffness, successfully classifying a majority of the 24 analysed plaque geometries, respectively. The ability to differentiate plaques was also better in the longitudinal views than in the transverse view. Group velocity as well as phase velocities <1 kHz showed a systematic underestimation of plaque stiffness, stemming from the confined plaque geometries, however, despite this group velocity analysis showed lowest deviation in estimated plaque stiffness (0.1 m s-1 compared to 0.2 m s-1 for phase velocity analysis). SWE results were also invariant to SWE push location, albeit apparent differences in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and generated plaque particle velocity. With that, the study has reinforced the potential of SWE for successful plaque differentiation; however the results also highlight the importance of choosing optimal imaging settings and using an appropriate wave speed metric when attempting to differentiate different plaque groups.

AB - Ultrasound elastography has shown potential for improved plaque risk stratification. However, no clear consensus exists on what output metric to use, or what imaging parameters would render optimal plaque differentiation. For this reason we developed a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup, in which the ability to differentiate phantom plaques of varying stiffness was evaluated as a function of plaque geometry, push location, imaging plane, and analysed wave speed metric. The results indicate that group velocity or phase velocity 1 kHz showed the highest ability to significantly differentiate plaques of different stiffness, successfully classifying a majority of the 24 analysed plaque geometries, respectively. The ability to differentiate plaques was also better in the longitudinal views than in the transverse view. Group velocity as well as phase velocities <1 kHz showed a systematic underestimation of plaque stiffness, stemming from the confined plaque geometries, however, despite this group velocity analysis showed lowest deviation in estimated plaque stiffness (0.1 m s-1 compared to 0.2 m s-1 for phase velocity analysis). SWE results were also invariant to SWE push location, albeit apparent differences in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and generated plaque particle velocity. With that, the study has reinforced the potential of SWE for successful plaque differentiation; however the results also highlight the importance of choosing optimal imaging settings and using an appropriate wave speed metric when attempting to differentiate different plaque groups.

KW - atherosclerosis

KW - elastography

KW - plaque characterization

KW - shear wave elastography

KW - ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057084601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057084601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6560/aaec2b

DO - 10.1088/1361-6560/aaec2b

M3 - Article

C2 - 30468683

AN - SCOPUS:85057084601

VL - 63

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 23

M1 - 235008

ER -