TY - JOUR
T1 - Plaque characterization using shear wave elastography - Evaluation of differentiability and accuracy using a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup
AU - Marlevi, David
AU - Maksuti, Elira
AU - Urban, Matthew W.
AU - Winter, Reidar
AU - Larsson, Matilda
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank technician Peter Arfert for his invaluable help in creating the experimental equipment. The authors also acknowledge the Jonasson Centre for Medical Imaging for providing the programmable ultrasound equipment, as well as the Mayo Clinic and Karolinska Institutet Collaboration Platform for assisting in the transatlantic collaboration. The study was also financially supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR, 2015-04237).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
PY - 2018/11/23
Y1 - 2018/11/23
N2 - Ultrasound elastography has shown potential for improved plaque risk stratification. However, no clear consensus exists on what output metric to use, or what imaging parameters would render optimal plaque differentiation. For this reason we developed a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup, in which the ability to differentiate phantom plaques of varying stiffness was evaluated as a function of plaque geometry, push location, imaging plane, and analysed wave speed metric. The results indicate that group velocity or phase velocity 1 kHz showed the highest ability to significantly differentiate plaques of different stiffness, successfully classifying a majority of the 24 analysed plaque geometries, respectively. The ability to differentiate plaques was also better in the longitudinal views than in the transverse view. Group velocity as well as phase velocities <1 kHz showed a systematic underestimation of plaque stiffness, stemming from the confined plaque geometries, however, despite this group velocity analysis showed lowest deviation in estimated plaque stiffness (0.1 m s-1 compared to 0.2 m s-1 for phase velocity analysis). SWE results were also invariant to SWE push location, albeit apparent differences in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and generated plaque particle velocity. With that, the study has reinforced the potential of SWE for successful plaque differentiation; however the results also highlight the importance of choosing optimal imaging settings and using an appropriate wave speed metric when attempting to differentiate different plaque groups.
AB - Ultrasound elastography has shown potential for improved plaque risk stratification. However, no clear consensus exists on what output metric to use, or what imaging parameters would render optimal plaque differentiation. For this reason we developed a combined ex vivo and in vitro setup, in which the ability to differentiate phantom plaques of varying stiffness was evaluated as a function of plaque geometry, push location, imaging plane, and analysed wave speed metric. The results indicate that group velocity or phase velocity 1 kHz showed the highest ability to significantly differentiate plaques of different stiffness, successfully classifying a majority of the 24 analysed plaque geometries, respectively. The ability to differentiate plaques was also better in the longitudinal views than in the transverse view. Group velocity as well as phase velocities <1 kHz showed a systematic underestimation of plaque stiffness, stemming from the confined plaque geometries, however, despite this group velocity analysis showed lowest deviation in estimated plaque stiffness (0.1 m s-1 compared to 0.2 m s-1 for phase velocity analysis). SWE results were also invariant to SWE push location, albeit apparent differences in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and generated plaque particle velocity. With that, the study has reinforced the potential of SWE for successful plaque differentiation; however the results also highlight the importance of choosing optimal imaging settings and using an appropriate wave speed metric when attempting to differentiate different plaque groups.
KW - atherosclerosis
KW - elastography
KW - plaque characterization
KW - shear wave elastography
KW - ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057084601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057084601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6560/aaec2b
DO - 10.1088/1361-6560/aaec2b
M3 - Article
C2 - 30468683
AN - SCOPUS:85057084601
SN - 0031-9155
VL - 63
JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology
JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology
IS - 23
M1 - 235008
ER -