TY - JOUR
T1 - Placental Location in Maternal-Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocele
AU - for the fMMC Consortium Sponsored by NAFTnet
AU - Lillegard, Joseph B.
AU - Eyerly-Webb, Stephanie A.
AU - Watson, David A.
AU - Bahtiyar, Mert Ozan
AU - Bennett, Kelly A.
AU - Emery, Stephen P.
AU - Fisher, Allan J.
AU - Goldstein, Ruth B.
AU - Goodnight, William H.
AU - Lim, Foong Yen
AU - McCullough, Laurence B.
AU - Moehrlen, Ueli
AU - Moldenhauer, Julie S.
AU - Moon-Grady, Anita J.
AU - Ruano, Rodrigo
AU - Skupski, Daniel W.
AU - Treadwell, Marjorie C.
AU - Tsao, Kuo Jen
AU - Wagner, Amy J.
AU - Zaretsky, Michael V.
N1 - Funding Information:
The NAFTNet and the fMMC Consortium are supported through funding by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5R131HD059293-05). The work conducted by the primary institution on this study was supported by the Children’s Minnesota Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Authors
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Introduction: Uterine incision based on the placental location in open maternal-fetal surgery (OMFS) has never been evaluated in regard to maternal or fetal outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether an anterior placenta was associated with increased rates of intraoperative, perioperative, antepartum, obstetric, or neonatal complications in mothers and babies who underwent OMFS for fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) closure. Methods: Data from the international multicenter prospective registry of patients who underwent OMFS for fMMC closure (fMMC Consortium Registry, December 15, 2010-June 31, 2019) was used to compare fetal and maternal outcomes between anterior and posterior placental locations. Results: The placental location for 623 patients was evenly distributed between anterior (51%) and posterior (49%) locations. Intraoperative fetal bradycardia (8.3% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.005) and performance of fetal resuscitation (3.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.034) occurred more frequently in cases with an anterior placenta when compared to those with a posterior placenta. Obstetric outcomes including membrane separation, placental abruption, and spontaneous rupture of membranes were not different among the 2 groups. However, thinning of the hysterotomy site (27.7% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.008) occurred more frequently in cases of an anterior placenta. Gestational age (GA) at delivery (p = 0.583) and length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (p = 0.655) were similar between the 2 groups. Fetal incision dehiscence and wound revision were not significantly different between groups. Critical clinical outcomes including fetal demise, perinatal death, and neonatal death were all infrequent occurrences and not associated with the placental location. Conclusions: An anterior placental location is associated with increased risk of intraoperative fetal resuscitation and increased thinning at the hysterotomy closure site. Individual institutional experiences may have varied, but the aggregate data from the fMMC Consortium did not show a significant impact on the GA at delivery or maternal or fetal clinical outcomes.
AB - Introduction: Uterine incision based on the placental location in open maternal-fetal surgery (OMFS) has never been evaluated in regard to maternal or fetal outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether an anterior placenta was associated with increased rates of intraoperative, perioperative, antepartum, obstetric, or neonatal complications in mothers and babies who underwent OMFS for fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) closure. Methods: Data from the international multicenter prospective registry of patients who underwent OMFS for fMMC closure (fMMC Consortium Registry, December 15, 2010-June 31, 2019) was used to compare fetal and maternal outcomes between anterior and posterior placental locations. Results: The placental location for 623 patients was evenly distributed between anterior (51%) and posterior (49%) locations. Intraoperative fetal bradycardia (8.3% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.005) and performance of fetal resuscitation (3.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.034) occurred more frequently in cases with an anterior placenta when compared to those with a posterior placenta. Obstetric outcomes including membrane separation, placental abruption, and spontaneous rupture of membranes were not different among the 2 groups. However, thinning of the hysterotomy site (27.7% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.008) occurred more frequently in cases of an anterior placenta. Gestational age (GA) at delivery (p = 0.583) and length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (p = 0.655) were similar between the 2 groups. Fetal incision dehiscence and wound revision were not significantly different between groups. Critical clinical outcomes including fetal demise, perinatal death, and neonatal death were all infrequent occurrences and not associated with the placental location. Conclusions: An anterior placental location is associated with increased risk of intraoperative fetal resuscitation and increased thinning at the hysterotomy closure site. Individual institutional experiences may have varied, but the aggregate data from the fMMC Consortium did not show a significant impact on the GA at delivery or maternal or fetal clinical outcomes.
KW - Anterior placenta
KW - Fetal myelomeningocele
KW - Open maternal-fetal surgery
KW - Placental location
KW - Spina bifida
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130635870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130635870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000521379
DO - 10.1159/000521379
M3 - Article
C2 - 34915495
AN - SCOPUS:85130635870
SN - 1015-3837
VL - 49
SP - 117
EP - 124
JO - Fetal Therapy
JF - Fetal Therapy
IS - 3
ER -