Piggyback technique and selective use of veno-venous bypass in adult orthotopic liver transplantation

K. Sudhakar Reddy, Thomas D. Johnston, Lee Ann Putnam, Michael Isley, Dinesh Ranjan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. The piggyback technique (PT), with preservation of the cava, is being used more frequently in adult orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The advantages of PT include hemodynamic stability during the anhepatic phase without a large-volume fluid infusion and obviating the need for veno-venous bypass (VVB). At our center, we changed our practice in July 1997 from the standard technique (ST) of OLT with routine use of VVB to PT and selective use of VVB. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the results with the two different practices, ST-routine VVB versus PT-selective VVB. Methods. Forty OLTs were performed during the period July 1995-July 1997 using ST-routine VVB (group I) and 36 during August 1997-December 1998 using PT-selective VVB (group II). The etiology of liver disease was similar in the two groups, with hepatitis C and alcoholic liver disease accounting for half of the patients in each group. The UNOS status, age, sex, and percentage of patients with previous upper abdominal surgery were also similar between the two groups. Results. In the PT-selective VVB era (group II), 34/36 patients (94%) underwent OLT with PT and VVB was used for 8 (22%) patients. The decision to use VVB was elective for 3 patients (fulminant hepatic failure, 2; severe portal hypertension, 1) and urgent for 5 patients (hemodynamic instability during hepatectomy). The intraoperative use of packed red blood cells (PRBC) (mean ± SD) was 15 ± 12 units for group I and 9 ± 8 units for group II (p = 0.023). Anastomosis time and total operating time (mean ± SD) were 91 ± 30 min and 9.5 ± 3.2 h, respectively, for group I patients compared with 52 ± 28 min and 7.6 ± 1.6 h, respectively, for group II patients (p < 0.0001 and 0.002, respectively). Median post-operative stays in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital were 5 and 17 d, respectively, for group I and 4 and 11 d, respectively, for group II (p = NS). Mean serum creatinine on day 3 was similar in the two groups. Median hospital charges for group I patients were $105 439 compared with $91 779 for group II patients (p = NS). The 1-year actuarial graft and patient survival rates were 78% and 82%, respectively, for group I, and 92% and 95%, respectively, for group II. Conclusions. PT is safe and can be performed in the majority of adult patients ( > 90%) undergoing OLT. With the routine application of the piggyback procedure, the use of VVB has been reduced to 20% of OLTs at our center. The practice of piggyback technique with the selective use of VVB is associated with shorter anhepatic phase and total operating time, lower blood product use, a trend towards shorter hospital length of stay, and reduced hospital charges compared with standard technique of OLT with routine use of VVB.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-374
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Transplantation
Volume14
Issue number4 II
StatePublished - Aug 12 2000

Keywords

  • Liver transplantation
  • Piggybank technique
  • Veno-venous bypass

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Piggyback technique and selective use of veno-venous bypass in adult orthotopic liver transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this