Physiological responses to reductions in available oxygen via normobaric vs. hypobaric hypoxia: Does it really matter?

Darren P. Casey

doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00356.2012

Physiological responses to reductions in available oxygen via normobaric vs. hypobaric hypoxia: Does it really matter?

Darren P. Casey

Anesthesiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1791
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of applied physiology
Volume	112
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00356.2012
State	Published - May 15 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Physiology
Physiology (medical)

Access to Document

10.1152/japplphysiol.00356.2012

Cite this

@article{98cb1bcf5a22462989ee3d314cbdb916,

title = "Physiological responses to reductions in available oxygen via normobaric vs. hypobaric hypoxia: Does it really matter?",

author = "Casey, {Darren P.}",

year = "2012",

month = may,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.00356.2012",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "112",

pages = "1791",

journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",

issn = "8750-7587",

publisher = "American Physiological Society",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiological responses to reductions in available oxygen via normobaric vs. hypobaric hypoxia

T2 - Does it really matter?

AU - Casey, Darren P.

PY - 2012/5/15

Y1 - 2012/5/15

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862071890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862071890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00356.2012

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00356.2012

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84862071890

SN - 8750-7587

VL - 112

SP - 1791

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

IS - 10

ER -

Physiological responses to reductions in available oxygen via normobaric vs. hypobaric hypoxia: Does it really matter?

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this