Physician practices in Accountable Care Organizations are more likely to collect and use physician performance information, yet base only a small proportion of compensation on performance data

Meredith Rosenthal, Stephen Shortell, Nilay D. Shah, David Peiris, Valerie A. Lewis, Jacob A. Barrera, Benjamin Usadi, Carrie H. Colla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Importance: It is critical to develop a better understanding of the strategies provider organizations use to improve the performance of frontline clinicians and whether ACO participation is associated with differential adoption of these tools. Objectives: Characterize the strategies that physician practices use to improve clinician performance and determine their association with ACOs and other payment reforms. Data Sources: The National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and the National Survey of ACOs fielded 2017-2018 (response rates = 47 percent and 48 percent). Study Design: Descriptive analysis for practices participating and not participating in ACOs among 2190 physician practice respondents. Linear regressions to examine characteristics associated with counts of performance domains for which a practice used data for feedback, quality improvement, or physician compensation as dependent variables. Logistic and fractional regression to examine characteristics associated with use of peer comparison and shares of primary care and specialist compensation accounted for by performance bonuses, respectively. Principal Findings: ACO-affiliated practices feed back clinician-level information and use it for quality improvement and compensation on more performance domains than non-ACO-affiliated practices. Performance measures contribute little to physician compensation irrespective of ACO participation. Conclusion: ACO-affiliated practices are using more performance improvement strategies than other practices, but base only a small fraction of compensation on quality or cost.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1214-1222
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume54
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

Accountable Care Organizations
Compensation and Redress
Physicians
Quality Improvement
Organizations
Health Care Surveys
Information Storage and Retrieval
Linear Models
Primary Health Care
Logistic Models
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Accountable Care Organizations
  • financial incentives
  • physician practices
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Physician practices in Accountable Care Organizations are more likely to collect and use physician performance information, yet base only a small proportion of compensation on performance data. / Rosenthal, Meredith; Shortell, Stephen; Shah, Nilay D.; Peiris, David; Lewis, Valerie A.; Barrera, Jacob A.; Usadi, Benjamin; Colla, Carrie H.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 54, No. 6, 01.12.2019, p. 1214-1222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosenthal, Meredith ; Shortell, Stephen ; Shah, Nilay D. ; Peiris, David ; Lewis, Valerie A. ; Barrera, Jacob A. ; Usadi, Benjamin ; Colla, Carrie H. / Physician practices in Accountable Care Organizations are more likely to collect and use physician performance information, yet base only a small proportion of compensation on performance data. In: Health Services Research. 2019 ; Vol. 54, No. 6. pp. 1214-1222.
@article{a4a98d6709424aa5a3d571353c8a6c5a,
title = "Physician practices in Accountable Care Organizations are more likely to collect and use physician performance information, yet base only a small proportion of compensation on performance data",
abstract = "Importance: It is critical to develop a better understanding of the strategies provider organizations use to improve the performance of frontline clinicians and whether ACO participation is associated with differential adoption of these tools. Objectives: Characterize the strategies that physician practices use to improve clinician performance and determine their association with ACOs and other payment reforms. Data Sources: The National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and the National Survey of ACOs fielded 2017-2018 (response rates = 47 percent and 48 percent). Study Design: Descriptive analysis for practices participating and not participating in ACOs among 2190 physician practice respondents. Linear regressions to examine characteristics associated with counts of performance domains for which a practice used data for feedback, quality improvement, or physician compensation as dependent variables. Logistic and fractional regression to examine characteristics associated with use of peer comparison and shares of primary care and specialist compensation accounted for by performance bonuses, respectively. Principal Findings: ACO-affiliated practices feed back clinician-level information and use it for quality improvement and compensation on more performance domains than non-ACO-affiliated practices. Performance measures contribute little to physician compensation irrespective of ACO participation. Conclusion: ACO-affiliated practices are using more performance improvement strategies than other practices, but base only a small fraction of compensation on quality or cost.",
keywords = "Accountable Care Organizations, financial incentives, physician practices, quality improvement",
author = "Meredith Rosenthal and Stephen Shortell and Shah, {Nilay D.} and David Peiris and Lewis, {Valerie A.} and Barrera, {Jacob A.} and Benjamin Usadi and Colla, {Carrie H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.13238",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "1214--1222",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician practices in Accountable Care Organizations are more likely to collect and use physician performance information, yet base only a small proportion of compensation on performance data

AU - Rosenthal, Meredith

AU - Shortell, Stephen

AU - Shah, Nilay D.

AU - Peiris, David

AU - Lewis, Valerie A.

AU - Barrera, Jacob A.

AU - Usadi, Benjamin

AU - Colla, Carrie H.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Importance: It is critical to develop a better understanding of the strategies provider organizations use to improve the performance of frontline clinicians and whether ACO participation is associated with differential adoption of these tools. Objectives: Characterize the strategies that physician practices use to improve clinician performance and determine their association with ACOs and other payment reforms. Data Sources: The National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and the National Survey of ACOs fielded 2017-2018 (response rates = 47 percent and 48 percent). Study Design: Descriptive analysis for practices participating and not participating in ACOs among 2190 physician practice respondents. Linear regressions to examine characteristics associated with counts of performance domains for which a practice used data for feedback, quality improvement, or physician compensation as dependent variables. Logistic and fractional regression to examine characteristics associated with use of peer comparison and shares of primary care and specialist compensation accounted for by performance bonuses, respectively. Principal Findings: ACO-affiliated practices feed back clinician-level information and use it for quality improvement and compensation on more performance domains than non-ACO-affiliated practices. Performance measures contribute little to physician compensation irrespective of ACO participation. Conclusion: ACO-affiliated practices are using more performance improvement strategies than other practices, but base only a small fraction of compensation on quality or cost.

AB - Importance: It is critical to develop a better understanding of the strategies provider organizations use to improve the performance of frontline clinicians and whether ACO participation is associated with differential adoption of these tools. Objectives: Characterize the strategies that physician practices use to improve clinician performance and determine their association with ACOs and other payment reforms. Data Sources: The National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and the National Survey of ACOs fielded 2017-2018 (response rates = 47 percent and 48 percent). Study Design: Descriptive analysis for practices participating and not participating in ACOs among 2190 physician practice respondents. Linear regressions to examine characteristics associated with counts of performance domains for which a practice used data for feedback, quality improvement, or physician compensation as dependent variables. Logistic and fractional regression to examine characteristics associated with use of peer comparison and shares of primary care and specialist compensation accounted for by performance bonuses, respectively. Principal Findings: ACO-affiliated practices feed back clinician-level information and use it for quality improvement and compensation on more performance domains than non-ACO-affiliated practices. Performance measures contribute little to physician compensation irrespective of ACO participation. Conclusion: ACO-affiliated practices are using more performance improvement strategies than other practices, but base only a small fraction of compensation on quality or cost.

KW - Accountable Care Organizations

KW - financial incentives

KW - physician practices

KW - quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075191916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075191916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.13238

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.13238

M3 - Article

C2 - 31742688

AN - SCOPUS:85075191916

VL - 54

SP - 1214

EP - 1222

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 6

ER -