Perspective on radiation risk in CT imaging

Joel G. Fletcher, James M. Kofler, John A. Coburn, David H. Bruining, Cynthia H. McCollough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Awareness of and communication about issues related to radiation dose are beneficial for patients, clinicians, and radiology departments. Initiating and facilitating discussions of the net benefit of CT by enlisting comparisons to more familiar activities, or by conveying that the anticipated radiation dose to an exam is similar to or much less than annual background levels help resolve the concerns of many patients and providers. While radiation risk estimates at the low doses associated with CT contain considerable uncertainty, we choose to err on the side of safety by assuming a small risk exists, even though the risk at these dose levels may be zero. Thus, radiologists should individualize CT scans according to patient size and diagnostic task to ensure that maximum benefit and minimum risk is achieved. However, because the magnitude of net benefit is driven by the potential benefit of a positive exam, radiation dose should not be reduced if doing so may compromise making an accurate diagnosis. The benefits and risks of CT are also highly individualized, and require consideration of many factors by patients, clinicians, and radiologists. Radiologists can assist clinicians and patients with understanding many of these factors, including test performance, potential patient benefit, and estimates of potential risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-31
Number of pages10
JournalAbdominal Imaging
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Keywords

  • CT
  • Radiation dose
  • Radiation risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perspective on radiation risk in CT imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this