TY - JOUR
T1 - Personalization of Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies Based on Physiology
T2 - a Prospective Feasibility Study with a Single Fluid-Filled Intragastric Balloon
AU - Lopez-Nava, Gontrand
AU - Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
AU - Storm, Andrew C.
AU - Maselli, Daniel B.
AU - Bautista-Castaño, Inmaculada
AU - Vargas, Eric J.
AU - Matar, Reem
AU - Acosta, Andres
AU - Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Abu Dayyeh is a consultant for USGI, DyaMX, Hemostasis, BFKW, Metamodix, Endo-TAGSS, and Boston Scientific. He recieved research support from Apollo Endosurgery, USGI, Boston Scientific, Cairn diagnostic, and Medtronic. He is speaker for Olympus, Johnson and Johnson, and Endogastric Solutions. Dr. Storm is a consultant of Apollo Endosurgery, GI Dynamics, and Endo-TAGSS, and the recipient of research support from Boston Scientific. All other authors report no relevant disclosures.
Funding Information:
Testing for gastric emptying study was supported by Cairn Diagnostics (Brentwood, TN) and Apollo Endosurgery (Austin, TX).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Background: The intragastric balloon (IGB) is commonly used for weight loss. Identifying patients who are most likely to tolerate and benefit from IGB therapy will optimize outcomes. Our aims were to prospectively utilize a gastric emptying study to predict intolerance and treatment response with a single fluid-filled IGB and to develop a physiologic prediction model with a treatment algorithm. Materials and Methods: A total of 32 patients had a gastric emptying study before and 2–3 months after placement of an IGB. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate likelihood ratios and to develop a physiologic prediction model. Results: Patients in the higher gastric retention quartile at baseline had a 6.2-time higher likelihood ratio for early balloon removal secondary to intolerance (p = 0.013). Utilizing baseline gastric emptying to predict intolerance to the IGB may have prevented 75% of early removal cases. Decreased gastric emptying at 3 months after balloon placement was significantly correlated with percent total body weight loss (%TWBL) at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.01 and p = 0.014, respectively). At 6 months after IGB, patients with no change in their gastric emptying at 3 months lost significantly less weight compared with those with increased gastric retention (median %TBWL = 9.0% [4.5–14.7] versus 17.3% [12.2–24.4], p = 0.016). Conclusion: Utilizing gastric emptying as a physiologic predictor of intolerance and response to the single fluid-filled IGB can improve outcomes. This pilot feasibility trial ushers in the era of personalized endoscopic bariatric therapies to maximize patients’ tolerance, cost-effectiveness, and meaningful weight loss.
AB - Background: The intragastric balloon (IGB) is commonly used for weight loss. Identifying patients who are most likely to tolerate and benefit from IGB therapy will optimize outcomes. Our aims were to prospectively utilize a gastric emptying study to predict intolerance and treatment response with a single fluid-filled IGB and to develop a physiologic prediction model with a treatment algorithm. Materials and Methods: A total of 32 patients had a gastric emptying study before and 2–3 months after placement of an IGB. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate likelihood ratios and to develop a physiologic prediction model. Results: Patients in the higher gastric retention quartile at baseline had a 6.2-time higher likelihood ratio for early balloon removal secondary to intolerance (p = 0.013). Utilizing baseline gastric emptying to predict intolerance to the IGB may have prevented 75% of early removal cases. Decreased gastric emptying at 3 months after balloon placement was significantly correlated with percent total body weight loss (%TWBL) at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.01 and p = 0.014, respectively). At 6 months after IGB, patients with no change in their gastric emptying at 3 months lost significantly less weight compared with those with increased gastric retention (median %TBWL = 9.0% [4.5–14.7] versus 17.3% [12.2–24.4], p = 0.016). Conclusion: Utilizing gastric emptying as a physiologic predictor of intolerance and response to the single fluid-filled IGB can improve outcomes. This pilot feasibility trial ushers in the era of personalized endoscopic bariatric therapies to maximize patients’ tolerance, cost-effectiveness, and meaningful weight loss.
KW - Gastric emptying
KW - Intolerance
KW - Intragastric balloon
KW - Obesity
KW - Personalized medicine
KW - Weight loss
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083763397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083763397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11695-020-04581-6
DO - 10.1007/s11695-020-04581-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 32285333
AN - SCOPUS:85083763397
SN - 0960-8923
VL - 30
SP - 3347
EP - 3353
JO - Obesity Surgery
JF - Obesity Surgery
IS - 9
ER -