Performance of patients with epilepsy or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures on four measures of effort

Dona E Locke, David T R Berry, Toufic A. Fakhoury, Jean E. Cibula, Frederick A. Schmitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Exaggeration of cognitive symptoms or poor effort on cognitive testing has been addressed primarily in the traumatic brain injury literature. The present investigation aims to extend the evaluation of effort to the epilepsy monitoring setting, where base rates of failure on effort testing remain unknown for patients with intractable epilepsy (ES), psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), or both conditions (ES+PNES). In addition, this investigation explores how well four measures of effort (DMT, LMT, TOMM, PDRT) distinguish between these diagnostic groups. Results show that 20% of the combined sample failed one or more effort measure. When examining failure rates for each diagnostic group, 22% of epilepsy patients, 24% of PNES patients, and 11% of ES+PNES patients performed suboptimally on one or more measure of effort. The utility of these effort measures to differentiate between these diagnostic groups appears limited. Further research is needed to clarify the base rate of poor effort in the epilepsy monitoring unit setting in general and in these three diagnostic groups specifically.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)552-566
Number of pages15
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006

Fingerprint

Epilepsy
Seizures
Neurobehavioral Manifestations
Research
Diagnostics
Monitoring
Testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Performance of patients with epilepsy or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures on four measures of effort. / Locke, Dona E; Berry, David T R; Fakhoury, Toufic A.; Cibula, Jean E.; Schmitt, Frederick A.

In: Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.09.2006, p. 552-566.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Locke, Dona E ; Berry, David T R ; Fakhoury, Toufic A. ; Cibula, Jean E. ; Schmitt, Frederick A. / Performance of patients with epilepsy or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures on four measures of effort. In: Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2006 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 552-566.
@article{483f368907f44f83848c9f90edd86092,
title = "Performance of patients with epilepsy or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures on four measures of effort",
abstract = "Exaggeration of cognitive symptoms or poor effort on cognitive testing has been addressed primarily in the traumatic brain injury literature. The present investigation aims to extend the evaluation of effort to the epilepsy monitoring setting, where base rates of failure on effort testing remain unknown for patients with intractable epilepsy (ES), psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), or both conditions (ES+PNES). In addition, this investigation explores how well four measures of effort (DMT, LMT, TOMM, PDRT) distinguish between these diagnostic groups. Results show that 20{\%} of the combined sample failed one or more effort measure. When examining failure rates for each diagnostic group, 22{\%} of epilepsy patients, 24{\%} of PNES patients, and 11{\%} of ES+PNES patients performed suboptimally on one or more measure of effort. The utility of these effort measures to differentiate between these diagnostic groups appears limited. Further research is needed to clarify the base rate of poor effort in the epilepsy monitoring unit setting in general and in these three diagnostic groups specifically.",
author = "Locke, {Dona E} and Berry, {David T R} and Fakhoury, {Toufic A.} and Cibula, {Jean E.} and Schmitt, {Frederick A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13854040590947380",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "552--566",
journal = "The Clinical neuropsychologist",
issn = "1385-4046",
publisher = "Swets & Zeitlinger",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of patients with epilepsy or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures on four measures of effort

AU - Locke, Dona E

AU - Berry, David T R

AU - Fakhoury, Toufic A.

AU - Cibula, Jean E.

AU - Schmitt, Frederick A.

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - Exaggeration of cognitive symptoms or poor effort on cognitive testing has been addressed primarily in the traumatic brain injury literature. The present investigation aims to extend the evaluation of effort to the epilepsy monitoring setting, where base rates of failure on effort testing remain unknown for patients with intractable epilepsy (ES), psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), or both conditions (ES+PNES). In addition, this investigation explores how well four measures of effort (DMT, LMT, TOMM, PDRT) distinguish between these diagnostic groups. Results show that 20% of the combined sample failed one or more effort measure. When examining failure rates for each diagnostic group, 22% of epilepsy patients, 24% of PNES patients, and 11% of ES+PNES patients performed suboptimally on one or more measure of effort. The utility of these effort measures to differentiate between these diagnostic groups appears limited. Further research is needed to clarify the base rate of poor effort in the epilepsy monitoring unit setting in general and in these three diagnostic groups specifically.

AB - Exaggeration of cognitive symptoms or poor effort on cognitive testing has been addressed primarily in the traumatic brain injury literature. The present investigation aims to extend the evaluation of effort to the epilepsy monitoring setting, where base rates of failure on effort testing remain unknown for patients with intractable epilepsy (ES), psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), or both conditions (ES+PNES). In addition, this investigation explores how well four measures of effort (DMT, LMT, TOMM, PDRT) distinguish between these diagnostic groups. Results show that 20% of the combined sample failed one or more effort measure. When examining failure rates for each diagnostic group, 22% of epilepsy patients, 24% of PNES patients, and 11% of ES+PNES patients performed suboptimally on one or more measure of effort. The utility of these effort measures to differentiate between these diagnostic groups appears limited. Further research is needed to clarify the base rate of poor effort in the epilepsy monitoring unit setting in general and in these three diagnostic groups specifically.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747095791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747095791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13854040590947380

DO - 10.1080/13854040590947380

M3 - Article

C2 - 16895866

AN - SCOPUS:33747095791

VL - 20

SP - 552

EP - 566

JO - The Clinical neuropsychologist

JF - The Clinical neuropsychologist

SN - 1385-4046

IS - 3

ER -