TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test by race and ethnicity
AU - Tang, W. H.Wilson
AU - Yimer, Habte
AU - Tummala, Mohan
AU - Shao, Spencer
AU - Chung, Gina
AU - Clement, Jessica
AU - Chu, Bong Chul
AU - Hubbell, Earl
AU - Kurtzman, Kathryn N.
AU - Swanton, Charles
AU - Roberts, Lewis R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Stephannie Shih, PhD and Cece Chen, PhD (GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc.) for their help with the statistical analysis. The authors thank Ruhi Ubale, PhD (GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc.) for help with manuscript development. Medical writing assistance was provided by Ian Rochford, PhD and Merrilee R. Johnstone, PhD of Prescott Medical Communications Group (Chicago, IL), according to Good Publication Practice guidelines and was funded by GRAIL, LLC.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., currently held separate from Illumina Inc. under the terms of the Interim Measures Order of the European Commission dated 29 October 2021, who was involved in the study's design, conduct, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and reporting (no grant number).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Disparities in cancer screening and outcomes based on factors such as sex, socioeconomic status, and race and ethnicity in the United States are well documented. A blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test that detects a shared cancer signal across multiple cancer types and also predicts the cancer signal origin was developed and validated in the Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study (CCGA; NCT02889978). CCGA is a prospective, multicenter, case-control, observational study with longitudinal follow-up (overall N = 15,254). In this pre-specified, exploratory, descriptive analysis, test performance was evaluated among racial and ethnic groups. Overall, 4077 participants comprised the independent validation set with confirmed cancer status (cancer: n = 2823; non-cancer: n = 1254). Participants were stratified into the following racial/ethnic groups: Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic (all races), Other (non-Hispanic), Other/unknown and White (non-Hispanic). Cancer and non-cancer participants were predominantly White (n = 2316, 82.0% and n = 996, 79.4%, respectively). Across groups, specificity for cancer signal detection ranged from 98.1% [n = 103; 95% CI: 93.2–99.5%] to 100% [n = 85; 95% CI: 95.7–100.0%]. The sensitivity for cancer signal detection across groups ranged from 43.9% [n = 57; 95% CI: 31.8–56.7%] to 63.0% [n = 192; 95% CI: 56.0–69.5%] and generally increased with clinical stage. The MCED test had consistently high specificity and similar sensitivity across racial and ethnic groups, though results are limited by sample size for some groups. Results support the broad applicability of this MCED test and clinical implementation on a population scale as a complement to standard screening.
AB - Disparities in cancer screening and outcomes based on factors such as sex, socioeconomic status, and race and ethnicity in the United States are well documented. A blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test that detects a shared cancer signal across multiple cancer types and also predicts the cancer signal origin was developed and validated in the Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study (CCGA; NCT02889978). CCGA is a prospective, multicenter, case-control, observational study with longitudinal follow-up (overall N = 15,254). In this pre-specified, exploratory, descriptive analysis, test performance was evaluated among racial and ethnic groups. Overall, 4077 participants comprised the independent validation set with confirmed cancer status (cancer: n = 2823; non-cancer: n = 1254). Participants were stratified into the following racial/ethnic groups: Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic (all races), Other (non-Hispanic), Other/unknown and White (non-Hispanic). Cancer and non-cancer participants were predominantly White (n = 2316, 82.0% and n = 996, 79.4%, respectively). Across groups, specificity for cancer signal detection ranged from 98.1% [n = 103; 95% CI: 93.2–99.5%] to 100% [n = 85; 95% CI: 95.7–100.0%]. The sensitivity for cancer signal detection across groups ranged from 43.9% [n = 57; 95% CI: 31.8–56.7%] to 63.0% [n = 192; 95% CI: 56.0–69.5%] and generally increased with clinical stage. The MCED test had consistently high specificity and similar sensitivity across racial and ethnic groups, though results are limited by sample size for some groups. Results support the broad applicability of this MCED test and clinical implementation on a population scale as a complement to standard screening.
KW - Cancer disparities
KW - Cancer screening
KW - Clinical validation
KW - MCED test
KW - Multi-cancer early detection
KW - Performance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145215465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85145215465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107384
DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107384
M3 - Article
C2 - 36495927
AN - SCOPUS:85145215465
SN - 0091-7435
VL - 167
JO - Preventive Medicine
JF - Preventive Medicine
M1 - 107384
ER -