Percutaneous laser ablation under ultrasound guidance for fetal hyperechogenic microcystic lung lesions with hydrops: A single center cohort and a literature review

Rodrigo Ruano, Marcos Marques da Silva, Eugenia Maria Assunção Salustiano, Mark David Kilby, Uenis Tannuri, Marcelo Zugaib

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the perinatal outcomes in hydropic fetuses with congenital microcystic pulmonary lesions that underwent percutaneous, invasive, laser therapy. Method: This retrospective study reviews the literature and our experience between 2004 and 2010. Characteristics of the cystic lung lesions, liquor volume (presence of polyhydramnios or not), localization of ablation (vascular vs interstitial) and gestational age at which the procedure was performed were related to outcome (survival). Results: In total, 16 fetuses with congenital lung lesions underwent 'invasive' percutaneous laser ablation, seven performed in our center and nine published cases. Survival rate was higher in fetuses with a subsequent postnatal diagnosis of bronchopulmonary sequestration (87.5%) compared with congenital adenomatoid malformation (28.6%; p=0.04). The technique of vascular ablation was more successful (100%) than interstitial ablation (25.0%, p<0.01). Conclusion: Percutaneous vascular laser ablation seems to be effective for bronchopulmonary sequestration in hydropic fetuses. Outcomes were worst following interstitial ablation for microcystic congenital adenomatoid with hydrops.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1127-1132
Number of pages6
JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
Volume32
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Percutaneous laser ablation under ultrasound guidance for fetal hyperechogenic microcystic lung lesions with hydrops: A single center cohort and a literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this