Percutaneous Image-guided Biopsy in an Elderly Population

Brian T. Welch, Timothy J. Welch, Timothy Maus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, accuracy, and clinical use of image-guided biopsy results in an elderly (age ≥80 years) patient population. Materials and Methods: Image-guided biopsy results of 722 elderly patients were obtained from our image-guided biopsy database over a 5-year period. This retrospective study of the data yielded 616 cases. The accuracy and complication rates for the elderly population were compared with the remaining patients in the database who were younger than 80 years of age (n= 13,012). In addition, use of biopsy results for treatment was also evaluated against a group of randomly selected younger patients who were matched for type and location of biopsy. Results: Image-guided biopsy in both patient groups was characterized by a high accuracy rate (95% for the elderly patients vs 96.5% for others), but the accuracy rate was significantly higher in the nonelderly group (P = .0247). Image-guided biopsy in elderly patients did not carry a greater complication rate compared with younger patients for any major complication. Use of malignant biopsy results (ie, initiating any therapy) was significantly less common in elderly patients (58% underwent therapy) than in younger age groups. In patients aged 60-70 y, 100% initiated therapy; in patients aged 70-80 y, 95% underwent therapy. Conclusions: Image-guided biopsy in elderly patients is a safe and accurate procedure. There is no greater risk of complication in elderly patients. Malignant diagnoses achieved by image-guided biopsy in elderly patients resulted less frequently in the initiation of therapy for malignancy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-100
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Image-Guided Biopsy
Population
Biopsy
Therapeutics
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Percutaneous Image-guided Biopsy in an Elderly Population. / Welch, Brian T.; Welch, Timothy J.; Maus, Timothy.

In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 96-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Welch, Brian T. ; Welch, Timothy J. ; Maus, Timothy. / Percutaneous Image-guided Biopsy in an Elderly Population. In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2010 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 96-100.
@article{4a2f346f8adf4348acbb64766c13e18b,
title = "Percutaneous Image-guided Biopsy in an Elderly Population",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the safety, accuracy, and clinical use of image-guided biopsy results in an elderly (age ≥80 years) patient population. Materials and Methods: Image-guided biopsy results of 722 elderly patients were obtained from our image-guided biopsy database over a 5-year period. This retrospective study of the data yielded 616 cases. The accuracy and complication rates for the elderly population were compared with the remaining patients in the database who were younger than 80 years of age (n= 13,012). In addition, use of biopsy results for treatment was also evaluated against a group of randomly selected younger patients who were matched for type and location of biopsy. Results: Image-guided biopsy in both patient groups was characterized by a high accuracy rate (95{\%} for the elderly patients vs 96.5{\%} for others), but the accuracy rate was significantly higher in the nonelderly group (P = .0247). Image-guided biopsy in elderly patients did not carry a greater complication rate compared with younger patients for any major complication. Use of malignant biopsy results (ie, initiating any therapy) was significantly less common in elderly patients (58{\%} underwent therapy) than in younger age groups. In patients aged 60-70 y, 100{\%} initiated therapy; in patients aged 70-80 y, 95{\%} underwent therapy. Conclusions: Image-guided biopsy in elderly patients is a safe and accurate procedure. There is no greater risk of complication in elderly patients. Malignant diagnoses achieved by image-guided biopsy in elderly patients resulted less frequently in the initiation of therapy for malignancy.",
author = "Welch, {Brian T.} and Welch, {Timothy J.} and Timothy Maus",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvir.2009.09.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "96--100",
journal = "Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology",
issn = "1051-0443",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous Image-guided Biopsy in an Elderly Population

AU - Welch, Brian T.

AU - Welch, Timothy J.

AU - Maus, Timothy

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the safety, accuracy, and clinical use of image-guided biopsy results in an elderly (age ≥80 years) patient population. Materials and Methods: Image-guided biopsy results of 722 elderly patients were obtained from our image-guided biopsy database over a 5-year period. This retrospective study of the data yielded 616 cases. The accuracy and complication rates for the elderly population were compared with the remaining patients in the database who were younger than 80 years of age (n= 13,012). In addition, use of biopsy results for treatment was also evaluated against a group of randomly selected younger patients who were matched for type and location of biopsy. Results: Image-guided biopsy in both patient groups was characterized by a high accuracy rate (95% for the elderly patients vs 96.5% for others), but the accuracy rate was significantly higher in the nonelderly group (P = .0247). Image-guided biopsy in elderly patients did not carry a greater complication rate compared with younger patients for any major complication. Use of malignant biopsy results (ie, initiating any therapy) was significantly less common in elderly patients (58% underwent therapy) than in younger age groups. In patients aged 60-70 y, 100% initiated therapy; in patients aged 70-80 y, 95% underwent therapy. Conclusions: Image-guided biopsy in elderly patients is a safe and accurate procedure. There is no greater risk of complication in elderly patients. Malignant diagnoses achieved by image-guided biopsy in elderly patients resulted less frequently in the initiation of therapy for malignancy.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the safety, accuracy, and clinical use of image-guided biopsy results in an elderly (age ≥80 years) patient population. Materials and Methods: Image-guided biopsy results of 722 elderly patients were obtained from our image-guided biopsy database over a 5-year period. This retrospective study of the data yielded 616 cases. The accuracy and complication rates for the elderly population were compared with the remaining patients in the database who were younger than 80 years of age (n= 13,012). In addition, use of biopsy results for treatment was also evaluated against a group of randomly selected younger patients who were matched for type and location of biopsy. Results: Image-guided biopsy in both patient groups was characterized by a high accuracy rate (95% for the elderly patients vs 96.5% for others), but the accuracy rate was significantly higher in the nonelderly group (P = .0247). Image-guided biopsy in elderly patients did not carry a greater complication rate compared with younger patients for any major complication. Use of malignant biopsy results (ie, initiating any therapy) was significantly less common in elderly patients (58% underwent therapy) than in younger age groups. In patients aged 60-70 y, 100% initiated therapy; in patients aged 70-80 y, 95% underwent therapy. Conclusions: Image-guided biopsy in elderly patients is a safe and accurate procedure. There is no greater risk of complication in elderly patients. Malignant diagnoses achieved by image-guided biopsy in elderly patients resulted less frequently in the initiation of therapy for malignancy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72249107932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72249107932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.09.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.09.025

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 96

EP - 100

JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

SN - 1051-0443

IS - 1

ER -