Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability

Mandeep Singh, Henry H. Ting, Bernard J. Gersh, Peter B. Berger, Ryan J. Lennon, David Holmes, Kirk N. Garratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction performed at a hospital without cardiac surgical capability with PCI performed for acute myocardial infarction at a center with on-site surgery. Patients and Methods: We included patients with acute myocardial infarction in whom PCI was performed from March 1, 2000, through May 31, 2002, at a community hospital (Immanuel St Joseph's) without on-site surgery. The procedural success, in-hospital adverse cardiac events, and 6-month follow-up were compared with those of PCI performed for acute myocardial infarction in matched controls from January 1, 2000, through February 28, 2002, at a center with cardiac surgery (Saint Marys Hospital). Results: One hundred sixty patients (and 160 matched controls) underwent PCI for acute myocardial infarction. The procedural success rate was high and similar for the 2 groups (96% vs 95%; P=.79). In-hospital mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization were low and similar for the 2 groups. No patient was referred for emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for failed PCL Six-month survival from all-cause mortality was 96% for the Immanuel St Joseph's group and 94% for the Saint Marys Hospital group (P=.92). Subgroup analysis of patients with primary PCI for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial Infarction revealed high procedural success and low and similar rates of major cardiac adverse events in the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study shows that PCI for acute myocardial infarction can be performed safely and effectively in a community hospital without on-site cardiac surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)738-744
Number of pages7
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume79
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Myocardial Infarction
Community Hospital
Thoracic Surgery
Hospital Mortality
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
Coronary Artery Bypass
Emergencies
Transplants
Safety
Survival
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability. / Singh, Mandeep; Ting, Henry H.; Gersh, Bernard J.; Berger, Peter B.; Lennon, Ryan J.; Holmes, David; Garratt, Kirk N.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 79, No. 6, 2004, p. 738-744.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Singh, Mandeep ; Ting, Henry H. ; Gersh, Bernard J. ; Berger, Peter B. ; Lennon, Ryan J. ; Holmes, David ; Garratt, Kirk N. / Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2004 ; Vol. 79, No. 6. pp. 738-744.
@article{ce8af4e940d14750bf30c370f9398c4f,
title = "Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction performed at a hospital without cardiac surgical capability with PCI performed for acute myocardial infarction at a center with on-site surgery. Patients and Methods: We included patients with acute myocardial infarction in whom PCI was performed from March 1, 2000, through May 31, 2002, at a community hospital (Immanuel St Joseph's) without on-site surgery. The procedural success, in-hospital adverse cardiac events, and 6-month follow-up were compared with those of PCI performed for acute myocardial infarction in matched controls from January 1, 2000, through February 28, 2002, at a center with cardiac surgery (Saint Marys Hospital). Results: One hundred sixty patients (and 160 matched controls) underwent PCI for acute myocardial infarction. The procedural success rate was high and similar for the 2 groups (96{\%} vs 95{\%}; P=.79). In-hospital mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization were low and similar for the 2 groups. No patient was referred for emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for failed PCL Six-month survival from all-cause mortality was 96{\%} for the Immanuel St Joseph's group and 94{\%} for the Saint Marys Hospital group (P=.92). Subgroup analysis of patients with primary PCI for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial Infarction revealed high procedural success and low and similar rates of major cardiac adverse events in the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study shows that PCI for acute myocardial infarction can be performed safely and effectively in a community hospital without on-site cardiac surgery.",
author = "Mandeep Singh and Ting, {Henry H.} and Gersh, {Bernard J.} and Berger, {Peter B.} and Lennon, {Ryan J.} and David Holmes and Garratt, {Kirk N.}",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "738--744",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability

AU - Singh, Mandeep

AU - Ting, Henry H.

AU - Gersh, Bernard J.

AU - Berger, Peter B.

AU - Lennon, Ryan J.

AU - Holmes, David

AU - Garratt, Kirk N.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction performed at a hospital without cardiac surgical capability with PCI performed for acute myocardial infarction at a center with on-site surgery. Patients and Methods: We included patients with acute myocardial infarction in whom PCI was performed from March 1, 2000, through May 31, 2002, at a community hospital (Immanuel St Joseph's) without on-site surgery. The procedural success, in-hospital adverse cardiac events, and 6-month follow-up were compared with those of PCI performed for acute myocardial infarction in matched controls from January 1, 2000, through February 28, 2002, at a center with cardiac surgery (Saint Marys Hospital). Results: One hundred sixty patients (and 160 matched controls) underwent PCI for acute myocardial infarction. The procedural success rate was high and similar for the 2 groups (96% vs 95%; P=.79). In-hospital mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization were low and similar for the 2 groups. No patient was referred for emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for failed PCL Six-month survival from all-cause mortality was 96% for the Immanuel St Joseph's group and 94% for the Saint Marys Hospital group (P=.92). Subgroup analysis of patients with primary PCI for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial Infarction revealed high procedural success and low and similar rates of major cardiac adverse events in the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study shows that PCI for acute myocardial infarction can be performed safely and effectively in a community hospital without on-site cardiac surgery.

AB - Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction performed at a hospital without cardiac surgical capability with PCI performed for acute myocardial infarction at a center with on-site surgery. Patients and Methods: We included patients with acute myocardial infarction in whom PCI was performed from March 1, 2000, through May 31, 2002, at a community hospital (Immanuel St Joseph's) without on-site surgery. The procedural success, in-hospital adverse cardiac events, and 6-month follow-up were compared with those of PCI performed for acute myocardial infarction in matched controls from January 1, 2000, through February 28, 2002, at a center with cardiac surgery (Saint Marys Hospital). Results: One hundred sixty patients (and 160 matched controls) underwent PCI for acute myocardial infarction. The procedural success rate was high and similar for the 2 groups (96% vs 95%; P=.79). In-hospital mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization were low and similar for the 2 groups. No patient was referred for emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for failed PCL Six-month survival from all-cause mortality was 96% for the Immanuel St Joseph's group and 94% for the Saint Marys Hospital group (P=.92). Subgroup analysis of patients with primary PCI for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial Infarction revealed high procedural success and low and similar rates of major cardiac adverse events in the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study shows that PCI for acute myocardial infarction can be performed safely and effectively in a community hospital without on-site cardiac surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2542491133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2542491133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15182087

AN - SCOPUS:2542491133

VL - 79

SP - 738

EP - 744

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 6

ER -