Perceptions of Provider Communication Among Vulnerable Patients With Diabetes: Influences of Medical Mistrust and Health Literacy

Richard O White, Rosette J. Chakkalakal, Caroline A. Presley, Aihua Bian, Jonathan S. Schildcrout, Kenneth A. Wallston, Shari Barto, Sunil Kripalani, Russell Rothman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient–provider communication is modifiable and is linked to diabetes outcomes. The association of communication quality with medical mistrust is unknown. We examined these factors within the context of a low-literacy/numeracy-focused intervention to improve diabetes care, using baseline data from diverse patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a health communication intervention. Demographics, measures of health communication (Communication Assessment Tool [CAT], Interpersonal Processes of Care survey [IPC-18]), health literacy (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults), depression, medical mistrust, and glycemic control were ascertained. Adjusted proportional odds models were used to test the association of mistrust with patient-reported communication quality. The interaction effect of health literacy on mistrust and communication quality was also assessed. A total of 410 patients were analyzed. High levels of mistrust were observed. In multivariable modeling, patients with higher mistrust had lower adjusted odds of reporting a higher CAT score (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.52, 0.86], p = .003) and higher scores on the Communication (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55, 0.88], p = .008), Decided Together (AOR = 0.74, 95% CI [0.59, 0.93], p = .02), and Interpersonal Style (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.53, 0.90], p = .015) subscales of the IPC-18. We observed evidence of an interaction effect of health literacy for the association between mistrust and the Decided Together subscale of the IPC-18 such that patients with higher mistrust and lower literacy perceived worse communication relative to mistrustful patients with higher literacy. In conclusion, medical mistrust was associated with poorer communication with providers in this public health setting. Patients’ health literacy level may vary the effect of mistrust on interactional aspects of communication. Providers should consider the impact of mistrust on communication with vulnerable diabetes populations and focus efforts on mitigating its influence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Health Communication
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 23 2016

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Medical problems
chronic illness
literacy
Communication
Health
communication
health
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Health Communication
confidence
Vulnerable Populations
Public health
interaction
Public Health
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Perceptions of Provider Communication Among Vulnerable Patients With Diabetes : Influences of Medical Mistrust and Health Literacy. / White, Richard O; Chakkalakal, Rosette J.; Presley, Caroline A.; Bian, Aihua; Schildcrout, Jonathan S.; Wallston, Kenneth A.; Barto, Shari; Kripalani, Sunil; Rothman, Russell.

In: Journal of Health Communication, 23.09.2016, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, Richard O ; Chakkalakal, Rosette J. ; Presley, Caroline A. ; Bian, Aihua ; Schildcrout, Jonathan S. ; Wallston, Kenneth A. ; Barto, Shari ; Kripalani, Sunil ; Rothman, Russell. / Perceptions of Provider Communication Among Vulnerable Patients With Diabetes : Influences of Medical Mistrust and Health Literacy. In: Journal of Health Communication. 2016 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{8ad77760e880471fac9db7771213eec6,
title = "Perceptions of Provider Communication Among Vulnerable Patients With Diabetes: Influences of Medical Mistrust and Health Literacy",
abstract = "Patient–provider communication is modifiable and is linked to diabetes outcomes. The association of communication quality with medical mistrust is unknown. We examined these factors within the context of a low-literacy/numeracy-focused intervention to improve diabetes care, using baseline data from diverse patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a health communication intervention. Demographics, measures of health communication (Communication Assessment Tool [CAT], Interpersonal Processes of Care survey [IPC-18]), health literacy (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults), depression, medical mistrust, and glycemic control were ascertained. Adjusted proportional odds models were used to test the association of mistrust with patient-reported communication quality. The interaction effect of health literacy on mistrust and communication quality was also assessed. A total of 410 patients were analyzed. High levels of mistrust were observed. In multivariable modeling, patients with higher mistrust had lower adjusted odds of reporting a higher CAT score (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.67, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] [0.52, 0.86], p = .003) and higher scores on the Communication (AOR = 0.69, 95{\%} CI [0.55, 0.88], p = .008), Decided Together (AOR = 0.74, 95{\%} CI [0.59, 0.93], p = .02), and Interpersonal Style (AOR = 0.69, 95{\%} CI [0.53, 0.90], p = .015) subscales of the IPC-18. We observed evidence of an interaction effect of health literacy for the association between mistrust and the Decided Together subscale of the IPC-18 such that patients with higher mistrust and lower literacy perceived worse communication relative to mistrustful patients with higher literacy. In conclusion, medical mistrust was associated with poorer communication with providers in this public health setting. Patients’ health literacy level may vary the effect of mistrust on interactional aspects of communication. Providers should consider the impact of mistrust on communication with vulnerable diabetes populations and focus efforts on mitigating its influence.",
author = "White, {Richard O} and Chakkalakal, {Rosette J.} and Presley, {Caroline A.} and Aihua Bian and Schildcrout, {Jonathan S.} and Wallston, {Kenneth A.} and Shari Barto and Sunil Kripalani and Russell Rothman",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2016.1207116",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of Provider Communication Among Vulnerable Patients With Diabetes

T2 - Influences of Medical Mistrust and Health Literacy

AU - White, Richard O

AU - Chakkalakal, Rosette J.

AU - Presley, Caroline A.

AU - Bian, Aihua

AU - Schildcrout, Jonathan S.

AU - Wallston, Kenneth A.

AU - Barto, Shari

AU - Kripalani, Sunil

AU - Rothman, Russell

PY - 2016/9/23

Y1 - 2016/9/23

N2 - Patient–provider communication is modifiable and is linked to diabetes outcomes. The association of communication quality with medical mistrust is unknown. We examined these factors within the context of a low-literacy/numeracy-focused intervention to improve diabetes care, using baseline data from diverse patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a health communication intervention. Demographics, measures of health communication (Communication Assessment Tool [CAT], Interpersonal Processes of Care survey [IPC-18]), health literacy (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults), depression, medical mistrust, and glycemic control were ascertained. Adjusted proportional odds models were used to test the association of mistrust with patient-reported communication quality. The interaction effect of health literacy on mistrust and communication quality was also assessed. A total of 410 patients were analyzed. High levels of mistrust were observed. In multivariable modeling, patients with higher mistrust had lower adjusted odds of reporting a higher CAT score (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.52, 0.86], p = .003) and higher scores on the Communication (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55, 0.88], p = .008), Decided Together (AOR = 0.74, 95% CI [0.59, 0.93], p = .02), and Interpersonal Style (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.53, 0.90], p = .015) subscales of the IPC-18. We observed evidence of an interaction effect of health literacy for the association between mistrust and the Decided Together subscale of the IPC-18 such that patients with higher mistrust and lower literacy perceived worse communication relative to mistrustful patients with higher literacy. In conclusion, medical mistrust was associated with poorer communication with providers in this public health setting. Patients’ health literacy level may vary the effect of mistrust on interactional aspects of communication. Providers should consider the impact of mistrust on communication with vulnerable diabetes populations and focus efforts on mitigating its influence.

AB - Patient–provider communication is modifiable and is linked to diabetes outcomes. The association of communication quality with medical mistrust is unknown. We examined these factors within the context of a low-literacy/numeracy-focused intervention to improve diabetes care, using baseline data from diverse patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a health communication intervention. Demographics, measures of health communication (Communication Assessment Tool [CAT], Interpersonal Processes of Care survey [IPC-18]), health literacy (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults), depression, medical mistrust, and glycemic control were ascertained. Adjusted proportional odds models were used to test the association of mistrust with patient-reported communication quality. The interaction effect of health literacy on mistrust and communication quality was also assessed. A total of 410 patients were analyzed. High levels of mistrust were observed. In multivariable modeling, patients with higher mistrust had lower adjusted odds of reporting a higher CAT score (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.52, 0.86], p = .003) and higher scores on the Communication (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55, 0.88], p = .008), Decided Together (AOR = 0.74, 95% CI [0.59, 0.93], p = .02), and Interpersonal Style (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.53, 0.90], p = .015) subscales of the IPC-18. We observed evidence of an interaction effect of health literacy for the association between mistrust and the Decided Together subscale of the IPC-18 such that patients with higher mistrust and lower literacy perceived worse communication relative to mistrustful patients with higher literacy. In conclusion, medical mistrust was associated with poorer communication with providers in this public health setting. Patients’ health literacy level may vary the effect of mistrust on interactional aspects of communication. Providers should consider the impact of mistrust on communication with vulnerable diabetes populations and focus efforts on mitigating its influence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988579074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988579074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2016.1207116

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2016.1207116

M3 - Article

C2 - 27662442

AN - SCOPUS:84988579074

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

ER -