Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and U.S. ICUs: Differences Between Nurses and Physicians

Hanne Irene Jensen, Stine Hebsgaard, Tina Charlotte Bitsch Hansen, Rikke Frank Aagaard Johnsen, Christiane S. Hartog, Ioanna Soultati, Orsolya Szucs, Michael E. Wilson, Bo van den Bulcke, Dominique D. Benoit, Ruth Piers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine perceptions of nurses and physicians in regard to ethical decision-making climate in the ICU and to test the hypothesis that the worse the ethical decision-making climate, the greater the discordance between nurses' and physicians' rating of ethical decision-making climate with physicians hypothesized to rate the climate better than the nurses. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: A total of 68 adult ICUs in 13 European countries and the United States. SUBJECTS: ICU physicians and nurses.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians were measured in April-May 2014, using a 35-items self-assessment questionnaire that evaluated seven factors (empowering leadership by physicians, interdisciplinary reflection, not avoiding end-of-life decisions, mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team, involvement of nurses in end-of-life care and decision-making, active decision-making by physicians, and ethical awareness). A total of 2,275 nurses and 717 physicians participated (response rate of 63%). Using cluster analysis, ICUs were categorized according to four ethical decision-making climates: good, average with nurses' involvement at end-of-life, average without nurses' involvement at end-of-life, and poor. Overall, physicians rated ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses (p < 0.001 for all seven factors). Physicians had more positive perceptions of ethical decision-making climate than nurses in all 13 participating countries and in each individual participating ICU. Compared to ICUs with good or average ethical decision-making climates, ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the greatest discordance between physicians and nurses. Although nurse/physician differences were found in all seven factors of ethical decision-making climate measurement, the factors with greatest discordance were regarding physician leadership, interdisciplinary reflection, and not avoiding end-of-life decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians consistently perceived ICU ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses. ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the largest discrepancies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1716-1723
Number of pages8
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume47
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

Climate
Decision Making
Nurses
Physicians
Terminal Care
Observational Studies
Cluster Analysis
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Jensen, H. I., Hebsgaard, S., Hansen, T. C. B., Johnsen, R. F. A., Hartog, C. S., Soultati, I., ... Piers, R. (2019). Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and U.S. ICUs: Differences Between Nurses and Physicians. Critical care medicine, 47(12), 1716-1723. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004017

Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and U.S. ICUs : Differences Between Nurses and Physicians. / Jensen, Hanne Irene; Hebsgaard, Stine; Hansen, Tina Charlotte Bitsch; Johnsen, Rikke Frank Aagaard; Hartog, Christiane S.; Soultati, Ioanna; Szucs, Orsolya; Wilson, Michael E.; van den Bulcke, Bo; Benoit, Dominique D.; Piers, Ruth.

In: Critical care medicine, Vol. 47, No. 12, 01.12.2019, p. 1716-1723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jensen, HI, Hebsgaard, S, Hansen, TCB, Johnsen, RFA, Hartog, CS, Soultati, I, Szucs, O, Wilson, ME, van den Bulcke, B, Benoit, DD & Piers, R 2019, 'Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and U.S. ICUs: Differences Between Nurses and Physicians', Critical care medicine, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1716-1723. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004017
Jensen, Hanne Irene ; Hebsgaard, Stine ; Hansen, Tina Charlotte Bitsch ; Johnsen, Rikke Frank Aagaard ; Hartog, Christiane S. ; Soultati, Ioanna ; Szucs, Orsolya ; Wilson, Michael E. ; van den Bulcke, Bo ; Benoit, Dominique D. ; Piers, Ruth. / Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and U.S. ICUs : Differences Between Nurses and Physicians. In: Critical care medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 47, No. 12. pp. 1716-1723.
@article{00ad543215624050bfc7426c1496ad4a,
title = "Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and U.S. ICUs: Differences Between Nurses and Physicians",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To examine perceptions of nurses and physicians in regard to ethical decision-making climate in the ICU and to test the hypothesis that the worse the ethical decision-making climate, the greater the discordance between nurses' and physicians' rating of ethical decision-making climate with physicians hypothesized to rate the climate better than the nurses. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: A total of 68 adult ICUs in 13 European countries and the United States. SUBJECTS: ICU physicians and nurses.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians were measured in April-May 2014, using a 35-items self-assessment questionnaire that evaluated seven factors (empowering leadership by physicians, interdisciplinary reflection, not avoiding end-of-life decisions, mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team, involvement of nurses in end-of-life care and decision-making, active decision-making by physicians, and ethical awareness). A total of 2,275 nurses and 717 physicians participated (response rate of 63{\%}). Using cluster analysis, ICUs were categorized according to four ethical decision-making climates: good, average with nurses' involvement at end-of-life, average without nurses' involvement at end-of-life, and poor. Overall, physicians rated ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses (p < 0.001 for all seven factors). Physicians had more positive perceptions of ethical decision-making climate than nurses in all 13 participating countries and in each individual participating ICU. Compared to ICUs with good or average ethical decision-making climates, ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the greatest discordance between physicians and nurses. Although nurse/physician differences were found in all seven factors of ethical decision-making climate measurement, the factors with greatest discordance were regarding physician leadership, interdisciplinary reflection, and not avoiding end-of-life decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians consistently perceived ICU ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses. ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the largest discrepancies.",
author = "Jensen, {Hanne Irene} and Stine Hebsgaard and Hansen, {Tina Charlotte Bitsch} and Johnsen, {Rikke Frank Aagaard} and Hartog, {Christiane S.} and Ioanna Soultati and Orsolya Szucs and Wilson, {Michael E.} and {van den Bulcke}, Bo and Benoit, {Dominique D.} and Ruth Piers",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000004017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "1716--1723",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and U.S. ICUs

T2 - Differences Between Nurses and Physicians

AU - Jensen, Hanne Irene

AU - Hebsgaard, Stine

AU - Hansen, Tina Charlotte Bitsch

AU - Johnsen, Rikke Frank Aagaard

AU - Hartog, Christiane S.

AU - Soultati, Ioanna

AU - Szucs, Orsolya

AU - Wilson, Michael E.

AU - van den Bulcke, Bo

AU - Benoit, Dominique D.

AU - Piers, Ruth

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To examine perceptions of nurses and physicians in regard to ethical decision-making climate in the ICU and to test the hypothesis that the worse the ethical decision-making climate, the greater the discordance between nurses' and physicians' rating of ethical decision-making climate with physicians hypothesized to rate the climate better than the nurses. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: A total of 68 adult ICUs in 13 European countries and the United States. SUBJECTS: ICU physicians and nurses.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians were measured in April-May 2014, using a 35-items self-assessment questionnaire that evaluated seven factors (empowering leadership by physicians, interdisciplinary reflection, not avoiding end-of-life decisions, mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team, involvement of nurses in end-of-life care and decision-making, active decision-making by physicians, and ethical awareness). A total of 2,275 nurses and 717 physicians participated (response rate of 63%). Using cluster analysis, ICUs were categorized according to four ethical decision-making climates: good, average with nurses' involvement at end-of-life, average without nurses' involvement at end-of-life, and poor. Overall, physicians rated ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses (p < 0.001 for all seven factors). Physicians had more positive perceptions of ethical decision-making climate than nurses in all 13 participating countries and in each individual participating ICU. Compared to ICUs with good or average ethical decision-making climates, ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the greatest discordance between physicians and nurses. Although nurse/physician differences were found in all seven factors of ethical decision-making climate measurement, the factors with greatest discordance were regarding physician leadership, interdisciplinary reflection, and not avoiding end-of-life decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians consistently perceived ICU ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses. ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the largest discrepancies.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To examine perceptions of nurses and physicians in regard to ethical decision-making climate in the ICU and to test the hypothesis that the worse the ethical decision-making climate, the greater the discordance between nurses' and physicians' rating of ethical decision-making climate with physicians hypothesized to rate the climate better than the nurses. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: A total of 68 adult ICUs in 13 European countries and the United States. SUBJECTS: ICU physicians and nurses.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians were measured in April-May 2014, using a 35-items self-assessment questionnaire that evaluated seven factors (empowering leadership by physicians, interdisciplinary reflection, not avoiding end-of-life decisions, mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team, involvement of nurses in end-of-life care and decision-making, active decision-making by physicians, and ethical awareness). A total of 2,275 nurses and 717 physicians participated (response rate of 63%). Using cluster analysis, ICUs were categorized according to four ethical decision-making climates: good, average with nurses' involvement at end-of-life, average without nurses' involvement at end-of-life, and poor. Overall, physicians rated ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses (p < 0.001 for all seven factors). Physicians had more positive perceptions of ethical decision-making climate than nurses in all 13 participating countries and in each individual participating ICU. Compared to ICUs with good or average ethical decision-making climates, ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the greatest discordance between physicians and nurses. Although nurse/physician differences were found in all seven factors of ethical decision-making climate measurement, the factors with greatest discordance were regarding physician leadership, interdisciplinary reflection, and not avoiding end-of-life decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians consistently perceived ICU ethical decision-making climate more positively than nurses. ICUs with poor ethical decision-making climates had the largest discrepancies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074839901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074839901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004017

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004017

M3 - Article

C2 - 31625980

AN - SCOPUS:85074839901

VL - 47

SP - 1716

EP - 1723

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 12

ER -