Perceptions of Barriers Towards Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

Results From a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists

Simon P. Kim, Cary P. Gross, Nilay D Shah, Jon C Tilburt, Badrinath Konety, Stephen B. Williams, Christopher J. Weight, James B. Yu, Aryavarta M.S. Kumar, Neal J. Meropol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The reasons for low clinical adoption of active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remain poorly understood. Thus, we conducted a national survey of radiation oncologists (ROs) and urologists (UROs) to elucidate perceived barriers to AS for low-risk PCa. Methods: In 2017, we undertook a four-wave mail survey of 1855 ROs and UROs. The survey instrument assessed attitudes about possible barriers towards AS for low-risk PCa. We used Pearson Chi square and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify physician characteristics associated with attitudes about AS. Results: We received 691 completed surveys for an overall response rate of 37.3%. A majority of respondents indicated that they felt comfortable recommending AS (90.0%), agreed that high-level evidence supports it (82.3%), and considered AS equally effective for survival compared with surgery and radiation therapy (84.4%). UROs were less likely to agree that patients were not interested in AS for low-risk PCa compared with ROs (16.5 vs. 48.9%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.18, p < 0.001). Similarly, UROs were less likely to concur patients avoid AS because of repeat prostate biopsies than ROs (36.3 vs. 55.4%; adjusted OR 0.41, p < 0.001). ROs and UROs were more likely to agree that patients preferred treatments delivered by the respondent’s specialty. Conclusions: Physician perceptions of patient lack of interest in AS, need for repeat prostate biopsies, and biases of patient treatment preferences in favor of their own specialty treatments represent key barriers to AS. Shared decision making may be a meaningful approach to engaging patients in conversations about treatment decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostate
Odds Ratio
Physicians
Biopsy
Patient Preference
Postal Service
Therapeutics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Radiation Oncologists
Urologists
Decision Making
Radiotherapy
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Perceptions of Barriers Towards Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer : Results From a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists. / Kim, Simon P.; Gross, Cary P.; Shah, Nilay D; Tilburt, Jon C; Konety, Badrinath; Williams, Stephen B.; Weight, Christopher J.; Yu, James B.; Kumar, Aryavarta M.S.; Meropol, Neal J.

In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Simon P. ; Gross, Cary P. ; Shah, Nilay D ; Tilburt, Jon C ; Konety, Badrinath ; Williams, Stephen B. ; Weight, Christopher J. ; Yu, James B. ; Kumar, Aryavarta M.S. ; Meropol, Neal J. / Perceptions of Barriers Towards Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer : Results From a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists. In: Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2018.
@article{a95b9701ec174d8bba7869e26af68189,
title = "Perceptions of Barriers Towards Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists",
abstract = "Purpose: The reasons for low clinical adoption of active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remain poorly understood. Thus, we conducted a national survey of radiation oncologists (ROs) and urologists (UROs) to elucidate perceived barriers to AS for low-risk PCa. Methods: In 2017, we undertook a four-wave mail survey of 1855 ROs and UROs. The survey instrument assessed attitudes about possible barriers towards AS for low-risk PCa. We used Pearson Chi square and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify physician characteristics associated with attitudes about AS. Results: We received 691 completed surveys for an overall response rate of 37.3{\%}. A majority of respondents indicated that they felt comfortable recommending AS (90.0{\%}), agreed that high-level evidence supports it (82.3{\%}), and considered AS equally effective for survival compared with surgery and radiation therapy (84.4{\%}). UROs were less likely to agree that patients were not interested in AS for low-risk PCa compared with ROs (16.5 vs. 48.9{\%}; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.18, p < 0.001). Similarly, UROs were less likely to concur patients avoid AS because of repeat prostate biopsies than ROs (36.3 vs. 55.4{\%}; adjusted OR 0.41, p < 0.001). ROs and UROs were more likely to agree that patients preferred treatments delivered by the respondent’s specialty. Conclusions: Physician perceptions of patient lack of interest in AS, need for repeat prostate biopsies, and biases of patient treatment preferences in favor of their own specialty treatments represent key barriers to AS. Shared decision making may be a meaningful approach to engaging patients in conversations about treatment decisions.",
author = "Kim, {Simon P.} and Gross, {Cary P.} and Shah, {Nilay D} and Tilburt, {Jon C} and Badrinath Konety and Williams, {Stephen B.} and Weight, {Christopher J.} and Yu, {James B.} and Kumar, {Aryavarta M.S.} and Meropol, {Neal J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1245/s10434-018-6863-1",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of Barriers Towards Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

T2 - Results From a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists

AU - Kim, Simon P.

AU - Gross, Cary P.

AU - Shah, Nilay D

AU - Tilburt, Jon C

AU - Konety, Badrinath

AU - Williams, Stephen B.

AU - Weight, Christopher J.

AU - Yu, James B.

AU - Kumar, Aryavarta M.S.

AU - Meropol, Neal J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The reasons for low clinical adoption of active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remain poorly understood. Thus, we conducted a national survey of radiation oncologists (ROs) and urologists (UROs) to elucidate perceived barriers to AS for low-risk PCa. Methods: In 2017, we undertook a four-wave mail survey of 1855 ROs and UROs. The survey instrument assessed attitudes about possible barriers towards AS for low-risk PCa. We used Pearson Chi square and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify physician characteristics associated with attitudes about AS. Results: We received 691 completed surveys for an overall response rate of 37.3%. A majority of respondents indicated that they felt comfortable recommending AS (90.0%), agreed that high-level evidence supports it (82.3%), and considered AS equally effective for survival compared with surgery and radiation therapy (84.4%). UROs were less likely to agree that patients were not interested in AS for low-risk PCa compared with ROs (16.5 vs. 48.9%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.18, p < 0.001). Similarly, UROs were less likely to concur patients avoid AS because of repeat prostate biopsies than ROs (36.3 vs. 55.4%; adjusted OR 0.41, p < 0.001). ROs and UROs were more likely to agree that patients preferred treatments delivered by the respondent’s specialty. Conclusions: Physician perceptions of patient lack of interest in AS, need for repeat prostate biopsies, and biases of patient treatment preferences in favor of their own specialty treatments represent key barriers to AS. Shared decision making may be a meaningful approach to engaging patients in conversations about treatment decisions.

AB - Purpose: The reasons for low clinical adoption of active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remain poorly understood. Thus, we conducted a national survey of radiation oncologists (ROs) and urologists (UROs) to elucidate perceived barriers to AS for low-risk PCa. Methods: In 2017, we undertook a four-wave mail survey of 1855 ROs and UROs. The survey instrument assessed attitudes about possible barriers towards AS for low-risk PCa. We used Pearson Chi square and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify physician characteristics associated with attitudes about AS. Results: We received 691 completed surveys for an overall response rate of 37.3%. A majority of respondents indicated that they felt comfortable recommending AS (90.0%), agreed that high-level evidence supports it (82.3%), and considered AS equally effective for survival compared with surgery and radiation therapy (84.4%). UROs were less likely to agree that patients were not interested in AS for low-risk PCa compared with ROs (16.5 vs. 48.9%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.18, p < 0.001). Similarly, UROs were less likely to concur patients avoid AS because of repeat prostate biopsies than ROs (36.3 vs. 55.4%; adjusted OR 0.41, p < 0.001). ROs and UROs were more likely to agree that patients preferred treatments delivered by the respondent’s specialty. Conclusions: Physician perceptions of patient lack of interest in AS, need for repeat prostate biopsies, and biases of patient treatment preferences in favor of their own specialty treatments represent key barriers to AS. Shared decision making may be a meaningful approach to engaging patients in conversations about treatment decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055355611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055355611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-018-6863-1

DO - 10.1245/s10434-018-6863-1

M3 - Article

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1068-9265

ER -