Perception of indications for nephrology referral among internal medicine residents: A national online survey

Varun Agrawal, Amit Ghosh, Michael A. Barnes, Peter A. McCullough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objectives: Many patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are seen by primary care physicians who may not be aware of indications or benefits of timely nephrologist referral. Late referral to a nephrologist may lead to suboptimal pre-end stage renal disease care and greater mortality. It is not known whether current postgraduate training adequately prepares a future internist in this aspect of CKD management. Design, setting, participants, and measurements: The authors performed an online questionnaire survey of internal medicine residents in the United States to determine their perceptions of indications for nephrology referral in CKD management. Results: Four hundred seventy-nine residents completed the survey with postgraduate year (PGY) distribution of 166 PGY 1,187 PGY 2 and 126 PGY 3. Few residents chose nephrology referral for proteinuria (45%), uncontrolled hypertension (64%), or hyperkalemia (26%). Twenty-eight percent of the residents considered consulting a nephrologist for anemia of CKD, whereas 45% would do so for bone disorder of CKD. Most of the residents would involve a nephrologist at glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (90%) and for rapid decline in GFR (79%). Many residents would refer a patient for dialysis setup at GFR 15 to 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (59%); however, 18% would do so at GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m 2. Presence of CKD clinic experience or an in-house nephrology fellowship program did not considerably change these perceptions. Conclusions: Results show that internal medicine residents have widely differing perceptions of indications for nephrology referral. Educational efforts during residency training to raise awareness and benefits of early referral may improve CKD management by facilitating better collaboration between internist and nephrologist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-328
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2009

Fingerprint

Nephrology
Internal Medicine
Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Referral and Consultation
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Disease Management
Hyperkalemia
Primary Care Physicians
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires
Proteinuria
Chronic Kidney Failure
Anemia
Dialysis
Nephrologists
Hypertension
Bone and Bones
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation
  • Epidemiology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Perception of indications for nephrology referral among internal medicine residents : A national online survey. / Agrawal, Varun; Ghosh, Amit; Barnes, Michael A.; McCullough, Peter A.

In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.02.2009, p. 323-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Agrawal, Varun ; Ghosh, Amit ; Barnes, Michael A. ; McCullough, Peter A. / Perception of indications for nephrology referral among internal medicine residents : A national online survey. In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2009 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 323-328.
@article{f2a5e1989e4c4cfd983bfc92325ffd13,
title = "Perception of indications for nephrology referral among internal medicine residents: A national online survey",
abstract = "Background and objectives: Many patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are seen by primary care physicians who may not be aware of indications or benefits of timely nephrologist referral. Late referral to a nephrologist may lead to suboptimal pre-end stage renal disease care and greater mortality. It is not known whether current postgraduate training adequately prepares a future internist in this aspect of CKD management. Design, setting, participants, and measurements: The authors performed an online questionnaire survey of internal medicine residents in the United States to determine their perceptions of indications for nephrology referral in CKD management. Results: Four hundred seventy-nine residents completed the survey with postgraduate year (PGY) distribution of 166 PGY 1,187 PGY 2 and 126 PGY 3. Few residents chose nephrology referral for proteinuria (45{\%}), uncontrolled hypertension (64{\%}), or hyperkalemia (26{\%}). Twenty-eight percent of the residents considered consulting a nephrologist for anemia of CKD, whereas 45{\%} would do so for bone disorder of CKD. Most of the residents would involve a nephrologist at glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (90{\%}) and for rapid decline in GFR (79{\%}). Many residents would refer a patient for dialysis setup at GFR 15 to 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (59{\%}); however, 18{\%} would do so at GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m 2. Presence of CKD clinic experience or an in-house nephrology fellowship program did not considerably change these perceptions. Conclusions: Results show that internal medicine residents have widely differing perceptions of indications for nephrology referral. Educational efforts during residency training to raise awareness and benefits of early referral may improve CKD management by facilitating better collaboration between internist and nephrologist.",
author = "Varun Agrawal and Amit Ghosh and Barnes, {Michael A.} and McCullough, {Peter A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2215/CJN.03510708",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "323--328",
journal = "Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology",
issn = "1555-9041",
publisher = "American Society of Nephrology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perception of indications for nephrology referral among internal medicine residents

T2 - A national online survey

AU - Agrawal, Varun

AU - Ghosh, Amit

AU - Barnes, Michael A.

AU - McCullough, Peter A.

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - Background and objectives: Many patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are seen by primary care physicians who may not be aware of indications or benefits of timely nephrologist referral. Late referral to a nephrologist may lead to suboptimal pre-end stage renal disease care and greater mortality. It is not known whether current postgraduate training adequately prepares a future internist in this aspect of CKD management. Design, setting, participants, and measurements: The authors performed an online questionnaire survey of internal medicine residents in the United States to determine their perceptions of indications for nephrology referral in CKD management. Results: Four hundred seventy-nine residents completed the survey with postgraduate year (PGY) distribution of 166 PGY 1,187 PGY 2 and 126 PGY 3. Few residents chose nephrology referral for proteinuria (45%), uncontrolled hypertension (64%), or hyperkalemia (26%). Twenty-eight percent of the residents considered consulting a nephrologist for anemia of CKD, whereas 45% would do so for bone disorder of CKD. Most of the residents would involve a nephrologist at glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (90%) and for rapid decline in GFR (79%). Many residents would refer a patient for dialysis setup at GFR 15 to 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (59%); however, 18% would do so at GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m 2. Presence of CKD clinic experience or an in-house nephrology fellowship program did not considerably change these perceptions. Conclusions: Results show that internal medicine residents have widely differing perceptions of indications for nephrology referral. Educational efforts during residency training to raise awareness and benefits of early referral may improve CKD management by facilitating better collaboration between internist and nephrologist.

AB - Background and objectives: Many patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are seen by primary care physicians who may not be aware of indications or benefits of timely nephrologist referral. Late referral to a nephrologist may lead to suboptimal pre-end stage renal disease care and greater mortality. It is not known whether current postgraduate training adequately prepares a future internist in this aspect of CKD management. Design, setting, participants, and measurements: The authors performed an online questionnaire survey of internal medicine residents in the United States to determine their perceptions of indications for nephrology referral in CKD management. Results: Four hundred seventy-nine residents completed the survey with postgraduate year (PGY) distribution of 166 PGY 1,187 PGY 2 and 126 PGY 3. Few residents chose nephrology referral for proteinuria (45%), uncontrolled hypertension (64%), or hyperkalemia (26%). Twenty-eight percent of the residents considered consulting a nephrologist for anemia of CKD, whereas 45% would do so for bone disorder of CKD. Most of the residents would involve a nephrologist at glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (90%) and for rapid decline in GFR (79%). Many residents would refer a patient for dialysis setup at GFR 15 to 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (59%); however, 18% would do so at GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m 2. Presence of CKD clinic experience or an in-house nephrology fellowship program did not considerably change these perceptions. Conclusions: Results show that internal medicine residents have widely differing perceptions of indications for nephrology referral. Educational efforts during residency training to raise awareness and benefits of early referral may improve CKD management by facilitating better collaboration between internist and nephrologist.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66849095716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66849095716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2215/CJN.03510708

DO - 10.2215/CJN.03510708

M3 - Article

C2 - 19218472

AN - SCOPUS:66849095716

VL - 4

SP - 323

EP - 328

JO - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

JF - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

SN - 1555-9041

IS - 2

ER -