Perceived Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek: Five Years Later1

Eric Dozois, Stefan D. Holubar, Vassiliki L. Tsikitis, Kishore Malireddy, Robert R. Cima, David R. Farley, David Larson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess perceptions of the effects of the 80-hour workweek (80hWW) restriction on patient care, education, and resident quality of life. Materials and Methods: In April 2007, attending surgeons and residents in nine surgical specialties at our institution were surveyed. Respondents were categorized into three groups: (1) attending surgeons; (2) residents beginning their training before the 80hWW implementation (ResBefore); and (3) residents beginning training after the 80hWW implementation (ResAfter). Differences between groups were assessed with univariate analysis. Results: The overall response rate was 57%. A minority in all three groups (≤33%) believed the 80hWW improved patient care. Fifteen percent of attending surgeons, 30% of ResBefore, and 67% of ResAfter believed patients were safer (P < 0.001). Eighty-three percent of attending surgeons, 74% of ResBefore, and 41% of ResAfter (P < 0.001) believed continuity of care was compromised. All groups (≥84%) agreed that midlevel providers were now critical to successfully deliver health care (P = 0.40). Fewer attending surgeons (21%) and ResBefore (29%) perceived improvements in education compared with ResAfter (68%; P <0.001). A majority perceived improved work-life balance for residents (attending surgeons [85%], ResBefore [71%], and ResAfter [92%]; P = 0.008), but 76% of attending surgeons reported decreased job satisfaction. Conclusion: We showed a discrepancy between perceptions of attending surgeons and residents regarding the effect of the 80hWW on patient care and surgical education. Quality of life was improved for residents but not for attending surgeons. The impact of the 80hWW on patient care and surgical education needs to be quantified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-15
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume156
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Patient Care
Education
Quality of Life
Surgical Specialties
Surgeons
Continuity of Patient Care
Job Satisfaction
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • attending physician
  • education
  • patient care
  • quality of life
  • residency
  • surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Dozois, E., Holubar, S. D., Tsikitis, V. L., Malireddy, K., Cima, R. R., Farley, D. R., & Larson, D. (2009). Perceived Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek: Five Years Later1. Journal of Surgical Research, 156(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.02.003

Perceived Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek : Five Years Later1. / Dozois, Eric; Holubar, Stefan D.; Tsikitis, Vassiliki L.; Malireddy, Kishore; Cima, Robert R.; Farley, David R.; Larson, David.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 156, No. 1, 09.2009, p. 3-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dozois, E, Holubar, SD, Tsikitis, VL, Malireddy, K, Cima, RR, Farley, DR & Larson, D 2009, 'Perceived Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek: Five Years Later1', Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.02.003
Dozois E, Holubar SD, Tsikitis VL, Malireddy K, Cima RR, Farley DR et al. Perceived Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek: Five Years Later1. Journal of Surgical Research. 2009 Sep;156(1):3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.02.003
Dozois, Eric ; Holubar, Stefan D. ; Tsikitis, Vassiliki L. ; Malireddy, Kishore ; Cima, Robert R. ; Farley, David R. ; Larson, David. / Perceived Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek : Five Years Later1. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2009 ; Vol. 156, No. 1. pp. 3-15.
@article{8ce81a5809534b9baa838a46788543b1,
title = "Perceived Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek: Five Years Later1",
abstract = "Background: We aimed to assess perceptions of the effects of the 80-hour workweek (80hWW) restriction on patient care, education, and resident quality of life. Materials and Methods: In April 2007, attending surgeons and residents in nine surgical specialties at our institution were surveyed. Respondents were categorized into three groups: (1) attending surgeons; (2) residents beginning their training before the 80hWW implementation (ResBefore); and (3) residents beginning training after the 80hWW implementation (ResAfter). Differences between groups were assessed with univariate analysis. Results: The overall response rate was 57{\%}. A minority in all three groups (≤33{\%}) believed the 80hWW improved patient care. Fifteen percent of attending surgeons, 30{\%} of ResBefore, and 67{\%} of ResAfter believed patients were safer (P < 0.001). Eighty-three percent of attending surgeons, 74{\%} of ResBefore, and 41{\%} of ResAfter (P < 0.001) believed continuity of care was compromised. All groups (≥84{\%}) agreed that midlevel providers were now critical to successfully deliver health care (P = 0.40). Fewer attending surgeons (21{\%}) and ResBefore (29{\%}) perceived improvements in education compared with ResAfter (68{\%}; P <0.001). A majority perceived improved work-life balance for residents (attending surgeons [85{\%}], ResBefore [71{\%}], and ResAfter [92{\%}]; P = 0.008), but 76{\%} of attending surgeons reported decreased job satisfaction. Conclusion: We showed a discrepancy between perceptions of attending surgeons and residents regarding the effect of the 80hWW on patient care and surgical education. Quality of life was improved for residents but not for attending surgeons. The impact of the 80hWW on patient care and surgical education needs to be quantified.",
keywords = "attending physician, education, patient care, quality of life, residency, surgery",
author = "Eric Dozois and Holubar, {Stefan D.} and Tsikitis, {Vassiliki L.} and Kishore Malireddy and Cima, {Robert R.} and Farley, {David R.} and David Larson",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2009.02.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "156",
pages = "3--15",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek

T2 - Five Years Later1

AU - Dozois, Eric

AU - Holubar, Stefan D.

AU - Tsikitis, Vassiliki L.

AU - Malireddy, Kishore

AU - Cima, Robert R.

AU - Farley, David R.

AU - Larson, David

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Background: We aimed to assess perceptions of the effects of the 80-hour workweek (80hWW) restriction on patient care, education, and resident quality of life. Materials and Methods: In April 2007, attending surgeons and residents in nine surgical specialties at our institution were surveyed. Respondents were categorized into three groups: (1) attending surgeons; (2) residents beginning their training before the 80hWW implementation (ResBefore); and (3) residents beginning training after the 80hWW implementation (ResAfter). Differences between groups were assessed with univariate analysis. Results: The overall response rate was 57%. A minority in all three groups (≤33%) believed the 80hWW improved patient care. Fifteen percent of attending surgeons, 30% of ResBefore, and 67% of ResAfter believed patients were safer (P < 0.001). Eighty-three percent of attending surgeons, 74% of ResBefore, and 41% of ResAfter (P < 0.001) believed continuity of care was compromised. All groups (≥84%) agreed that midlevel providers were now critical to successfully deliver health care (P = 0.40). Fewer attending surgeons (21%) and ResBefore (29%) perceived improvements in education compared with ResAfter (68%; P <0.001). A majority perceived improved work-life balance for residents (attending surgeons [85%], ResBefore [71%], and ResAfter [92%]; P = 0.008), but 76% of attending surgeons reported decreased job satisfaction. Conclusion: We showed a discrepancy between perceptions of attending surgeons and residents regarding the effect of the 80hWW on patient care and surgical education. Quality of life was improved for residents but not for attending surgeons. The impact of the 80hWW on patient care and surgical education needs to be quantified.

AB - Background: We aimed to assess perceptions of the effects of the 80-hour workweek (80hWW) restriction on patient care, education, and resident quality of life. Materials and Methods: In April 2007, attending surgeons and residents in nine surgical specialties at our institution were surveyed. Respondents were categorized into three groups: (1) attending surgeons; (2) residents beginning their training before the 80hWW implementation (ResBefore); and (3) residents beginning training after the 80hWW implementation (ResAfter). Differences between groups were assessed with univariate analysis. Results: The overall response rate was 57%. A minority in all three groups (≤33%) believed the 80hWW improved patient care. Fifteen percent of attending surgeons, 30% of ResBefore, and 67% of ResAfter believed patients were safer (P < 0.001). Eighty-three percent of attending surgeons, 74% of ResBefore, and 41% of ResAfter (P < 0.001) believed continuity of care was compromised. All groups (≥84%) agreed that midlevel providers were now critical to successfully deliver health care (P = 0.40). Fewer attending surgeons (21%) and ResBefore (29%) perceived improvements in education compared with ResAfter (68%; P <0.001). A majority perceived improved work-life balance for residents (attending surgeons [85%], ResBefore [71%], and ResAfter [92%]; P = 0.008), but 76% of attending surgeons reported decreased job satisfaction. Conclusion: We showed a discrepancy between perceptions of attending surgeons and residents regarding the effect of the 80hWW on patient care and surgical education. Quality of life was improved for residents but not for attending surgeons. The impact of the 80hWW on patient care and surgical education needs to be quantified.

KW - attending physician

KW - education

KW - patient care

KW - quality of life

KW - residency

KW - surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68649093699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68649093699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2009.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2009.02.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 19481225

AN - SCOPUS:68649093699

VL - 156

SP - 3

EP - 15

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -