Perceived impact of human subjects protection training on community partners in community-based participatory research

Nancy C. Hawley, Mark L. Wieland, Jennifer A. Weis, Irene Gaw Sia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Human subjects protection training (HSPT) is a requirement of institutional review boards (IRBs) for individuals who engage in research. The lack of HSPT among community partners may contribute to power imbalance between community and academic members of communitybased participatory research (CBPR) partnerships. The Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP) is an established CBPR partnership in Minnesota that works primarily with immigrant and refugee populations.

Objective: We sought to describe the implementation and evaluation of HSPT among community members of a CBPR partnership.

Methods: Seven community partners participated in HSPT through adaptation of an existing institutional program. Evaluation of program acceptability was measured through a 5-item survey (5-point Likert scales). A focus group with all seven participants was conducted to evaluate the impact of training on perceptions of research, characteristics of a successful program, and potential value of training to CBPR partnerships. Coding and inductive analysis were done on the transcript with NVIVO-9 software.

Results: The HSPT program was highly acceptable (mean score, 4.5 ± 0.2). Focus groups revealed that training implementation should be done as a cohesive group with the opportunity to discuss concepts as they pertain to partnership projects. Training fostered an encouraging and safe environment, accommodated diverse learning styles, and promoted interaction. Participants reported improved trust in research as a result of the training. Perceived impact of the training on the CBPR partnership included improved transparency and enhanced camaraderie while establishing essential knowledge required for community leaders.

Conclusions: HSPT is feasible among community members of a CBPR partnership, and may improve perceptions of research while strengthening capacity of partnerships to impact community health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-248
Number of pages8
JournalProgress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Community-Based Participatory Research
Research
community
Focus Groups
Refugees
Research Ethics Committees
Program Evaluation
Group
evaluation
transparency
refugee
training program
Software
coding

Keywords

  • Anthropology
  • Community-based participatory research
  • Health care evaluation mechanisms
  • Health care quality access and evaluation
  • Power sharing
  • Vulnerable populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{667c0d51e61c4490b85e7b7bc8d8fa4a,
title = "Perceived impact of human subjects protection training on community partners in community-based participatory research",
abstract = "Background: Human subjects protection training (HSPT) is a requirement of institutional review boards (IRBs) for individuals who engage in research. The lack of HSPT among community partners may contribute to power imbalance between community and academic members of communitybased participatory research (CBPR) partnerships. The Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP) is an established CBPR partnership in Minnesota that works primarily with immigrant and refugee populations.Objective: We sought to describe the implementation and evaluation of HSPT among community members of a CBPR partnership.Methods: Seven community partners participated in HSPT through adaptation of an existing institutional program. Evaluation of program acceptability was measured through a 5-item survey (5-point Likert scales). A focus group with all seven participants was conducted to evaluate the impact of training on perceptions of research, characteristics of a successful program, and potential value of training to CBPR partnerships. Coding and inductive analysis were done on the transcript with NVIVO-9 software.Results: The HSPT program was highly acceptable (mean score, 4.5 ± 0.2). Focus groups revealed that training implementation should be done as a cohesive group with the opportunity to discuss concepts as they pertain to partnership projects. Training fostered an encouraging and safe environment, accommodated diverse learning styles, and promoted interaction. Participants reported improved trust in research as a result of the training. Perceived impact of the training on the CBPR partnership included improved transparency and enhanced camaraderie while establishing essential knowledge required for community leaders.Conclusions: HSPT is feasible among community members of a CBPR partnership, and may improve perceptions of research while strengthening capacity of partnerships to impact community health.",
keywords = "Anthropology, Community-based participatory research, Health care evaluation mechanisms, Health care quality access and evaluation, Power sharing, Vulnerable populations",
author = "Hawley, {Nancy C.} and Wieland, {Mark L.} and Weis, {Jennifer A.} and Sia, {Irene Gaw}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1353/cpr.2014.0023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "241--248",
journal = "Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action",
issn = "1557-0541",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived impact of human subjects protection training on community partners in community-based participatory research

AU - Hawley, Nancy C.

AU - Wieland, Mark L.

AU - Weis, Jennifer A.

AU - Sia, Irene Gaw

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Human subjects protection training (HSPT) is a requirement of institutional review boards (IRBs) for individuals who engage in research. The lack of HSPT among community partners may contribute to power imbalance between community and academic members of communitybased participatory research (CBPR) partnerships. The Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP) is an established CBPR partnership in Minnesota that works primarily with immigrant and refugee populations.Objective: We sought to describe the implementation and evaluation of HSPT among community members of a CBPR partnership.Methods: Seven community partners participated in HSPT through adaptation of an existing institutional program. Evaluation of program acceptability was measured through a 5-item survey (5-point Likert scales). A focus group with all seven participants was conducted to evaluate the impact of training on perceptions of research, characteristics of a successful program, and potential value of training to CBPR partnerships. Coding and inductive analysis were done on the transcript with NVIVO-9 software.Results: The HSPT program was highly acceptable (mean score, 4.5 ± 0.2). Focus groups revealed that training implementation should be done as a cohesive group with the opportunity to discuss concepts as they pertain to partnership projects. Training fostered an encouraging and safe environment, accommodated diverse learning styles, and promoted interaction. Participants reported improved trust in research as a result of the training. Perceived impact of the training on the CBPR partnership included improved transparency and enhanced camaraderie while establishing essential knowledge required for community leaders.Conclusions: HSPT is feasible among community members of a CBPR partnership, and may improve perceptions of research while strengthening capacity of partnerships to impact community health.

AB - Background: Human subjects protection training (HSPT) is a requirement of institutional review boards (IRBs) for individuals who engage in research. The lack of HSPT among community partners may contribute to power imbalance between community and academic members of communitybased participatory research (CBPR) partnerships. The Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP) is an established CBPR partnership in Minnesota that works primarily with immigrant and refugee populations.Objective: We sought to describe the implementation and evaluation of HSPT among community members of a CBPR partnership.Methods: Seven community partners participated in HSPT through adaptation of an existing institutional program. Evaluation of program acceptability was measured through a 5-item survey (5-point Likert scales). A focus group with all seven participants was conducted to evaluate the impact of training on perceptions of research, characteristics of a successful program, and potential value of training to CBPR partnerships. Coding and inductive analysis were done on the transcript with NVIVO-9 software.Results: The HSPT program was highly acceptable (mean score, 4.5 ± 0.2). Focus groups revealed that training implementation should be done as a cohesive group with the opportunity to discuss concepts as they pertain to partnership projects. Training fostered an encouraging and safe environment, accommodated diverse learning styles, and promoted interaction. Participants reported improved trust in research as a result of the training. Perceived impact of the training on the CBPR partnership included improved transparency and enhanced camaraderie while establishing essential knowledge required for community leaders.Conclusions: HSPT is feasible among community members of a CBPR partnership, and may improve perceptions of research while strengthening capacity of partnerships to impact community health.

KW - Anthropology

KW - Community-based participatory research

KW - Health care evaluation mechanisms

KW - Health care quality access and evaluation

KW - Power sharing

KW - Vulnerable populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906970268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906970268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2014.0023

DO - 10.1353/cpr.2014.0023

M3 - Article

C2 - 25152106

AN - SCOPUS:84906970268

VL - 8

SP - 241

EP - 248

JO - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

JF - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

SN - 1557-0541

IS - 2

ER -