PEG Feeding tube placement following a stroke

When to place, when to wait

James S. Scolapio, Michelle Romano, James F Meschia, Vilia Tarrosa, Felix E. Chukwudelunzu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: When to place a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube in acute post-stroke patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine clinical predictors of long-term enteral feeding following a stroke. Method: Medical records of patients at St. Luke's Hospital (Mayo Clinic) from 1995 to 1998 were reviewed for acute stroke that resulted in PEG placement. Comorbid medical illness, stroke subtypes, Glasgow score, swallow evaluation, and time of PEG placement to discontinuation or death were recorded. Results: Thirty-two patients were eligible for study. Mean follow-up was 4 months poststroke. Mean age was 71.3 years. Twenty-five patients had an ischemic stroke, and 7 had primary intracranial hemorrhage. Swallow evaluation was abnormal in 21 of the 23 patients tested. A PEG tube was placed a mean of 8.4 days poststroke in all patients studied. At final follow-up, only 5 surviving patients regained swallowing function in less than 4 weeks and no longer required the PEG. These patients were younger, had mild dysphagia, and had less comorbid medical illness and ischemic strokes compared with the group who did not regain swallow function in 4 weeks. Conclusion: Nonhemorrhagic stroke, mild oropharyngeal dysphagia, limited comorbidities, and younger age help predict patients that may need nutrition support for <4 weeks following a stroke. These patients may best be served with temporary nasogastric feeding tubes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-39
Number of pages4
JournalNutrition in Clinical Practice
Volume15
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Gastrostomy
Enteral Nutrition
Stroke
Deglutition
Deglutition Disorders
Intracranial Hemorrhages
Medical Records
Comorbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Scolapio, J. S., Romano, M., Meschia, J. F., Tarrosa, V., & Chukwudelunzu, F. E. (2000). PEG Feeding tube placement following a stroke: When to place, when to wait. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 15(1), 36-39.

PEG Feeding tube placement following a stroke : When to place, when to wait. / Scolapio, James S.; Romano, Michelle; Meschia, James F; Tarrosa, Vilia; Chukwudelunzu, Felix E.

In: Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2000, p. 36-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scolapio, JS, Romano, M, Meschia, JF, Tarrosa, V & Chukwudelunzu, FE 2000, 'PEG Feeding tube placement following a stroke: When to place, when to wait', Nutrition in Clinical Practice, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 36-39.
Scolapio, James S. ; Romano, Michelle ; Meschia, James F ; Tarrosa, Vilia ; Chukwudelunzu, Felix E. / PEG Feeding tube placement following a stroke : When to place, when to wait. In: Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2000 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 36-39.
@article{0fd217a61a6940e7bcabbfec3dec9ae4,
title = "PEG Feeding tube placement following a stroke: When to place, when to wait",
abstract = "Background: When to place a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube in acute post-stroke patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine clinical predictors of long-term enteral feeding following a stroke. Method: Medical records of patients at St. Luke's Hospital (Mayo Clinic) from 1995 to 1998 were reviewed for acute stroke that resulted in PEG placement. Comorbid medical illness, stroke subtypes, Glasgow score, swallow evaluation, and time of PEG placement to discontinuation or death were recorded. Results: Thirty-two patients were eligible for study. Mean follow-up was 4 months poststroke. Mean age was 71.3 years. Twenty-five patients had an ischemic stroke, and 7 had primary intracranial hemorrhage. Swallow evaluation was abnormal in 21 of the 23 patients tested. A PEG tube was placed a mean of 8.4 days poststroke in all patients studied. At final follow-up, only 5 surviving patients regained swallowing function in less than 4 weeks and no longer required the PEG. These patients were younger, had mild dysphagia, and had less comorbid medical illness and ischemic strokes compared with the group who did not regain swallow function in 4 weeks. Conclusion: Nonhemorrhagic stroke, mild oropharyngeal dysphagia, limited comorbidities, and younger age help predict patients that may need nutrition support for <4 weeks following a stroke. These patients may best be served with temporary nasogastric feeding tubes.",
author = "Scolapio, {James S.} and Michelle Romano and Meschia, {James F} and Vilia Tarrosa and Chukwudelunzu, {Felix E.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "36--39",
journal = "Nutrition in Clinical Practice",
issn = "0884-5336",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PEG Feeding tube placement following a stroke

T2 - When to place, when to wait

AU - Scolapio, James S.

AU - Romano, Michelle

AU - Meschia, James F

AU - Tarrosa, Vilia

AU - Chukwudelunzu, Felix E.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Background: When to place a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube in acute post-stroke patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine clinical predictors of long-term enteral feeding following a stroke. Method: Medical records of patients at St. Luke's Hospital (Mayo Clinic) from 1995 to 1998 were reviewed for acute stroke that resulted in PEG placement. Comorbid medical illness, stroke subtypes, Glasgow score, swallow evaluation, and time of PEG placement to discontinuation or death were recorded. Results: Thirty-two patients were eligible for study. Mean follow-up was 4 months poststroke. Mean age was 71.3 years. Twenty-five patients had an ischemic stroke, and 7 had primary intracranial hemorrhage. Swallow evaluation was abnormal in 21 of the 23 patients tested. A PEG tube was placed a mean of 8.4 days poststroke in all patients studied. At final follow-up, only 5 surviving patients regained swallowing function in less than 4 weeks and no longer required the PEG. These patients were younger, had mild dysphagia, and had less comorbid medical illness and ischemic strokes compared with the group who did not regain swallow function in 4 weeks. Conclusion: Nonhemorrhagic stroke, mild oropharyngeal dysphagia, limited comorbidities, and younger age help predict patients that may need nutrition support for <4 weeks following a stroke. These patients may best be served with temporary nasogastric feeding tubes.

AB - Background: When to place a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube in acute post-stroke patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine clinical predictors of long-term enteral feeding following a stroke. Method: Medical records of patients at St. Luke's Hospital (Mayo Clinic) from 1995 to 1998 were reviewed for acute stroke that resulted in PEG placement. Comorbid medical illness, stroke subtypes, Glasgow score, swallow evaluation, and time of PEG placement to discontinuation or death were recorded. Results: Thirty-two patients were eligible for study. Mean follow-up was 4 months poststroke. Mean age was 71.3 years. Twenty-five patients had an ischemic stroke, and 7 had primary intracranial hemorrhage. Swallow evaluation was abnormal in 21 of the 23 patients tested. A PEG tube was placed a mean of 8.4 days poststroke in all patients studied. At final follow-up, only 5 surviving patients regained swallowing function in less than 4 weeks and no longer required the PEG. These patients were younger, had mild dysphagia, and had less comorbid medical illness and ischemic strokes compared with the group who did not regain swallow function in 4 weeks. Conclusion: Nonhemorrhagic stroke, mild oropharyngeal dysphagia, limited comorbidities, and younger age help predict patients that may need nutrition support for <4 weeks following a stroke. These patients may best be served with temporary nasogastric feeding tubes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949721634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949721634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 36

EP - 39

JO - Nutrition in Clinical Practice

JF - Nutrition in Clinical Practice

SN - 0884-5336

IS - 1

ER -