Pedometer accuracy for children: Can we recommend them for our obese population?

Naim Mitre, Lorraine Lanningham-Foster, Randal Foster, James A. Levine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of measuring walking steps with commercially available pedometers and an accelerometer-based step-counter in normal and overweight children. Our primary hypothesis was that commercially available pedometers are not an accurate measure of walking steps in normal and overweight children while walking. Our secondary hypothesis was that the accelero-meter-based step-counter provides an accurate measure of walking steps in normal and overweight children. METHODS. Thirteen boys (11 ± 1 years) and 14 girls (11 ± 1 years) who ranged in BMI from 15 to 27 kg/m 2 (16 normal and 11 overweight or obese) were recruited. Each child wore 4 pedometers at the waist and 1 accelerometer-based step-counter on each ankle. Steps were manually counted and energy expenditure was measured while the child walked on the treadmill at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mph, each for 5 minutes. The step-counting devices were also validated while children walked on level ground at a self-selected pace. RESULTS. For the commercially available pedometers at the lowest speed of 0.5 mph, the percentage error approximated 100% for both of the pedometers. At the fastest speed of 2.0 mph, the percentage error approximated 60%. Conversely the accelero-meter-based step-counter showed a percentage error of 24% ± 22% (mean ± SD) at 0.5 mph;however, as walking speed increased, the error declined to 5% ± 8% at 1.0 mph, 4% ± 5% at 1.5 mph, and 2% ± 2% at 2.0 mph. The relationship between steps counted and walking energy expenditure showed good linear correlation. CONCLUSIONS. Commercially available pedometers are less accurate for measuring walking and require discretion in their use for children. The accuracy of the accelerometer-based step-counter enables it to be used as a tool to assess and potentially promote physical activity in normal and overweight children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPediatrics
Volume123
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Walking
Population
Energy Metabolism
Ankle
Exercise
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Children
  • Energy expenditure
  • Obesity
  • Pedometers
  • Physical activity
  • Walking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Pedometer accuracy for children : Can we recommend them for our obese population? / Mitre, Naim; Lanningham-Foster, Lorraine; Foster, Randal; Levine, James A.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 123, No. 1, 01.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitre, Naim ; Lanningham-Foster, Lorraine ; Foster, Randal ; Levine, James A. / Pedometer accuracy for children : Can we recommend them for our obese population?. In: Pediatrics. 2009 ; Vol. 123, No. 1.
@article{96c408a5ad874079ad1db0aa9a44c9db,
title = "Pedometer accuracy for children: Can we recommend them for our obese population?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of measuring walking steps with commercially available pedometers and an accelerometer-based step-counter in normal and overweight children. Our primary hypothesis was that commercially available pedometers are not an accurate measure of walking steps in normal and overweight children while walking. Our secondary hypothesis was that the accelero-meter-based step-counter provides an accurate measure of walking steps in normal and overweight children. METHODS. Thirteen boys (11 ± 1 years) and 14 girls (11 ± 1 years) who ranged in BMI from 15 to 27 kg/m 2 (16 normal and 11 overweight or obese) were recruited. Each child wore 4 pedometers at the waist and 1 accelerometer-based step-counter on each ankle. Steps were manually counted and energy expenditure was measured while the child walked on the treadmill at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mph, each for 5 minutes. The step-counting devices were also validated while children walked on level ground at a self-selected pace. RESULTS. For the commercially available pedometers at the lowest speed of 0.5 mph, the percentage error approximated 100{\%} for both of the pedometers. At the fastest speed of 2.0 mph, the percentage error approximated 60{\%}. Conversely the accelero-meter-based step-counter showed a percentage error of 24{\%} ± 22{\%} (mean ± SD) at 0.5 mph;however, as walking speed increased, the error declined to 5{\%} ± 8{\%} at 1.0 mph, 4{\%} ± 5{\%} at 1.5 mph, and 2{\%} ± 2{\%} at 2.0 mph. The relationship between steps counted and walking energy expenditure showed good linear correlation. CONCLUSIONS. Commercially available pedometers are less accurate for measuring walking and require discretion in their use for children. The accuracy of the accelerometer-based step-counter enables it to be used as a tool to assess and potentially promote physical activity in normal and overweight children.",
keywords = "Children, Energy expenditure, Obesity, Pedometers, Physical activity, Walking",
author = "Naim Mitre and Lorraine Lanningham-Foster and Randal Foster and Levine, {James A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2008-1908",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pedometer accuracy for children

T2 - Can we recommend them for our obese population?

AU - Mitre, Naim

AU - Lanningham-Foster, Lorraine

AU - Foster, Randal

AU - Levine, James A.

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of measuring walking steps with commercially available pedometers and an accelerometer-based step-counter in normal and overweight children. Our primary hypothesis was that commercially available pedometers are not an accurate measure of walking steps in normal and overweight children while walking. Our secondary hypothesis was that the accelero-meter-based step-counter provides an accurate measure of walking steps in normal and overweight children. METHODS. Thirteen boys (11 ± 1 years) and 14 girls (11 ± 1 years) who ranged in BMI from 15 to 27 kg/m 2 (16 normal and 11 overweight or obese) were recruited. Each child wore 4 pedometers at the waist and 1 accelerometer-based step-counter on each ankle. Steps were manually counted and energy expenditure was measured while the child walked on the treadmill at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mph, each for 5 minutes. The step-counting devices were also validated while children walked on level ground at a self-selected pace. RESULTS. For the commercially available pedometers at the lowest speed of 0.5 mph, the percentage error approximated 100% for both of the pedometers. At the fastest speed of 2.0 mph, the percentage error approximated 60%. Conversely the accelero-meter-based step-counter showed a percentage error of 24% ± 22% (mean ± SD) at 0.5 mph;however, as walking speed increased, the error declined to 5% ± 8% at 1.0 mph, 4% ± 5% at 1.5 mph, and 2% ± 2% at 2.0 mph. The relationship between steps counted and walking energy expenditure showed good linear correlation. CONCLUSIONS. Commercially available pedometers are less accurate for measuring walking and require discretion in their use for children. The accuracy of the accelerometer-based step-counter enables it to be used as a tool to assess and potentially promote physical activity in normal and overweight children.

AB - OBJECTIVE. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of measuring walking steps with commercially available pedometers and an accelerometer-based step-counter in normal and overweight children. Our primary hypothesis was that commercially available pedometers are not an accurate measure of walking steps in normal and overweight children while walking. Our secondary hypothesis was that the accelero-meter-based step-counter provides an accurate measure of walking steps in normal and overweight children. METHODS. Thirteen boys (11 ± 1 years) and 14 girls (11 ± 1 years) who ranged in BMI from 15 to 27 kg/m 2 (16 normal and 11 overweight or obese) were recruited. Each child wore 4 pedometers at the waist and 1 accelerometer-based step-counter on each ankle. Steps were manually counted and energy expenditure was measured while the child walked on the treadmill at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mph, each for 5 minutes. The step-counting devices were also validated while children walked on level ground at a self-selected pace. RESULTS. For the commercially available pedometers at the lowest speed of 0.5 mph, the percentage error approximated 100% for both of the pedometers. At the fastest speed of 2.0 mph, the percentage error approximated 60%. Conversely the accelero-meter-based step-counter showed a percentage error of 24% ± 22% (mean ± SD) at 0.5 mph;however, as walking speed increased, the error declined to 5% ± 8% at 1.0 mph, 4% ± 5% at 1.5 mph, and 2% ± 2% at 2.0 mph. The relationship between steps counted and walking energy expenditure showed good linear correlation. CONCLUSIONS. Commercially available pedometers are less accurate for measuring walking and require discretion in their use for children. The accuracy of the accelerometer-based step-counter enables it to be used as a tool to assess and potentially promote physical activity in normal and overweight children.

KW - Children

KW - Energy expenditure

KW - Obesity

KW - Pedometers

KW - Physical activity

KW - Walking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59449103274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59449103274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2008-1908

DO - 10.1542/peds.2008-1908

M3 - Article

C2 - 19117834

AN - SCOPUS:59449103274

VL - 123

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 1

ER -