PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial

Megan Coylewright, Sara Dick, Becky Zmolek, Jason Askelin, Edward Hawkins, Megan Branda, Jonathan W. Inselman, Claudia Zeballos-Palacios, Nilay D Shah, Erik P. Hess, Annie Leblanc, Victor Manuel Montori, Henry H. Ting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background - Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease does not reduce the risk of death and myocardial infarction compared with optimal medical therapy (OMT), but many patients think otherwise. PCI Choice, a decision aid (DA), was designed for use during the clinical visit and includes information on quality of life and mortality outcomes for PCI with OMT versus OMT alone for stable coronary artery disease. Methods and Results - We conducted a randomized trial to assess the impact of the PCI Choice DA compared with usual care when there is a choice between PCI and optimal medical therapy. Primary outcomes were patient knowledge and decisional conflict, and the secondary outcome was an objective measure of shared decision making. A total of 124 patients were eligible for final analysis. Knowledge was higher among patients receiving the DA compared with usual care (60% DA; 40% usual care; P=0.034), and patients felt more informed (P=0.043). Other measures of decisional quality were not improved, and engagement of the patient by the clinician in shared decision making did not change with use of the DA. There was evidence that clinicians used the DA as an educational tool. Conclusions - The PCI Choice DA improved patient knowledge but did not significantly impact decisional quality. Further work is needed to effectively address clinician knowledge gaps in shared decision-making skills, even in the context of carefully designed DAs. Clinical Trial Registration - URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01771536.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)767-776
Number of pages10
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease
Decision Making
Patient Participation
Therapeutics
Myocardial Infarction
Quality of Life
Clinical Trials
Mortality

Keywords

  • coronary artery disease
  • decision making, shared
  • decision support techniques
  • patient-centered care
  • percutaneous coronary intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Coylewright, M., Dick, S., Zmolek, B., Askelin, J., Hawkins, E., Branda, M., ... Ting, H. H. (2016). PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 9(6), 767-776. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002641

PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease : A Randomized Trial. / Coylewright, Megan; Dick, Sara; Zmolek, Becky; Askelin, Jason; Hawkins, Edward; Branda, Megan; Inselman, Jonathan W.; Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia; Shah, Nilay D; Hess, Erik P.; Leblanc, Annie; Montori, Victor Manuel; Ting, Henry H.

In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Vol. 9, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. 767-776.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coylewright, M, Dick, S, Zmolek, B, Askelin, J, Hawkins, E, Branda, M, Inselman, JW, Zeballos-Palacios, C, Shah, ND, Hess, EP, Leblanc, A, Montori, VM & Ting, HH 2016, 'PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial', Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 767-776. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002641
Coylewright, Megan ; Dick, Sara ; Zmolek, Becky ; Askelin, Jason ; Hawkins, Edward ; Branda, Megan ; Inselman, Jonathan W. ; Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia ; Shah, Nilay D ; Hess, Erik P. ; Leblanc, Annie ; Montori, Victor Manuel ; Ting, Henry H. / PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease : A Randomized Trial. In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 767-776.
@article{0bb531f66ce943dea062cc271dd39e4d,
title = "PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial",
abstract = "Background - Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease does not reduce the risk of death and myocardial infarction compared with optimal medical therapy (OMT), but many patients think otherwise. PCI Choice, a decision aid (DA), was designed for use during the clinical visit and includes information on quality of life and mortality outcomes for PCI with OMT versus OMT alone for stable coronary artery disease. Methods and Results - We conducted a randomized trial to assess the impact of the PCI Choice DA compared with usual care when there is a choice between PCI and optimal medical therapy. Primary outcomes were patient knowledge and decisional conflict, and the secondary outcome was an objective measure of shared decision making. A total of 124 patients were eligible for final analysis. Knowledge was higher among patients receiving the DA compared with usual care (60{\%} DA; 40{\%} usual care; P=0.034), and patients felt more informed (P=0.043). Other measures of decisional quality were not improved, and engagement of the patient by the clinician in shared decision making did not change with use of the DA. There was evidence that clinicians used the DA as an educational tool. Conclusions - The PCI Choice DA improved patient knowledge but did not significantly impact decisional quality. Further work is needed to effectively address clinician knowledge gaps in shared decision-making skills, even in the context of carefully designed DAs. Clinical Trial Registration - URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01771536.",
keywords = "coronary artery disease, decision making, shared, decision support techniques, patient-centered care, percutaneous coronary intervention",
author = "Megan Coylewright and Sara Dick and Becky Zmolek and Jason Askelin and Edward Hawkins and Megan Branda and Inselman, {Jonathan W.} and Claudia Zeballos-Palacios and Shah, {Nilay D} and Hess, {Erik P.} and Annie Leblanc and Montori, {Victor Manuel} and Ting, {Henry H.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002641",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "767--776",
journal = "Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes",
issn = "1941-7713",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease

T2 - A Randomized Trial

AU - Coylewright, Megan

AU - Dick, Sara

AU - Zmolek, Becky

AU - Askelin, Jason

AU - Hawkins, Edward

AU - Branda, Megan

AU - Inselman, Jonathan W.

AU - Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia

AU - Shah, Nilay D

AU - Hess, Erik P.

AU - Leblanc, Annie

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

AU - Ting, Henry H.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Background - Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease does not reduce the risk of death and myocardial infarction compared with optimal medical therapy (OMT), but many patients think otherwise. PCI Choice, a decision aid (DA), was designed for use during the clinical visit and includes information on quality of life and mortality outcomes for PCI with OMT versus OMT alone for stable coronary artery disease. Methods and Results - We conducted a randomized trial to assess the impact of the PCI Choice DA compared with usual care when there is a choice between PCI and optimal medical therapy. Primary outcomes were patient knowledge and decisional conflict, and the secondary outcome was an objective measure of shared decision making. A total of 124 patients were eligible for final analysis. Knowledge was higher among patients receiving the DA compared with usual care (60% DA; 40% usual care; P=0.034), and patients felt more informed (P=0.043). Other measures of decisional quality were not improved, and engagement of the patient by the clinician in shared decision making did not change with use of the DA. There was evidence that clinicians used the DA as an educational tool. Conclusions - The PCI Choice DA improved patient knowledge but did not significantly impact decisional quality. Further work is needed to effectively address clinician knowledge gaps in shared decision-making skills, even in the context of carefully designed DAs. Clinical Trial Registration - URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01771536.

AB - Background - Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease does not reduce the risk of death and myocardial infarction compared with optimal medical therapy (OMT), but many patients think otherwise. PCI Choice, a decision aid (DA), was designed for use during the clinical visit and includes information on quality of life and mortality outcomes for PCI with OMT versus OMT alone for stable coronary artery disease. Methods and Results - We conducted a randomized trial to assess the impact of the PCI Choice DA compared with usual care when there is a choice between PCI and optimal medical therapy. Primary outcomes were patient knowledge and decisional conflict, and the secondary outcome was an objective measure of shared decision making. A total of 124 patients were eligible for final analysis. Knowledge was higher among patients receiving the DA compared with usual care (60% DA; 40% usual care; P=0.034), and patients felt more informed (P=0.043). Other measures of decisional quality were not improved, and engagement of the patient by the clinician in shared decision making did not change with use of the DA. There was evidence that clinicians used the DA as an educational tool. Conclusions - The PCI Choice DA improved patient knowledge but did not significantly impact decisional quality. Further work is needed to effectively address clinician knowledge gaps in shared decision-making skills, even in the context of carefully designed DAs. Clinical Trial Registration - URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01771536.

KW - coronary artery disease

KW - decision making, shared

KW - decision support techniques

KW - patient-centered care

KW - percutaneous coronary intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995968676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995968676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002641

DO - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002641

M3 - Article

C2 - 27803090

AN - SCOPUS:84995968676

VL - 9

SP - 767

EP - 776

JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

SN - 1941-7713

IS - 6

ER -