TY - JOUR
T1 - Patterns of neuropsychological changes after general anaesthesia in young children
T2 - secondary analysis of the Mayo Anesthesia Safety in Kids study
AU - Zaccariello, Michael J.
AU - Frank, Ryan D.
AU - Lee, Minji
AU - Kirsch, Alexandra C.
AU - Schroeder, Darrell R.
AU - Hanson, Andrew C.
AU - Schulte, Phillip J.
AU - Wilder, Robert T.
AU - Sprung, Juraj
AU - Katusic, Slavica K.
AU - Flick, Randall P.
AU - Warner, David O.
N1 - Funding Information:
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (R01 HD071907); National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health (R01 AG034676). The authors would like to thank the staff at the Mayo Clinic Psychological Assessment Lab for their dedicated work in subject testing, and Bradley Peterson (Children's Hospital of Los Angeles and the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA) for suggesting the factor analysis approach. The authors would also like to recognise the extraordinary contributions of Robert Colligan, who was crucial in the design of the study and died during its conduct; he is sorely missed.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Background: We hypothesised that exposure to multiple, but not single, procedures requiring general anaesthesia before age 3 yr is associated with a specific pattern of deficits in processing speed and fine motor skills. Methods: A secondary analysis (using factor and cluster analyses) of data from the Mayo Anesthesia Safety in Kids study was conducted, in which unexposed, singly exposed, and multiply exposed children born in Olmsted County, MN, USA from 1994 to 2007 were sampled using a propensity-guided approach and underwent neuropsychological testing at ages 8–12 or 15–20 yr. Results: In the factor analysis, the data were well fit to a five factor model. For subjects multiply (but not singly) exposed to anaesthesia, a factor reflecting motor skills, visual-motor integration, and processing speed was significantly lower [standardised difference of –0.35 (95% confidence interval {CI} –0.57 to –0.13)] compared with unexposed subjects. No other factor was associated with exposure. Three groups were identified in the cluster analysis, with 106 subjects (10.6%) in Cluster A (lowest performance in most tests), 557 (55.9%) in Cluster B, and 334 (33.5%) in Cluster C (highest performance in most tests). The odds of multiply exposed children belonging to Cluster A was 2.83 (95% CI: 1.49–5.35; P=0.001) compared with belonging to Cluster B; there was no other significant association between exposure status and cluster membership. Conclusions: Multiple, but not single, exposures to procedures requiring general anaesthesia before age 3 yr are associated with a specific pattern of deficits in neuropsychological tests. Factors predicting which children develop the most pronounced deficits remain unknown.
AB - Background: We hypothesised that exposure to multiple, but not single, procedures requiring general anaesthesia before age 3 yr is associated with a specific pattern of deficits in processing speed and fine motor skills. Methods: A secondary analysis (using factor and cluster analyses) of data from the Mayo Anesthesia Safety in Kids study was conducted, in which unexposed, singly exposed, and multiply exposed children born in Olmsted County, MN, USA from 1994 to 2007 were sampled using a propensity-guided approach and underwent neuropsychological testing at ages 8–12 or 15–20 yr. Results: In the factor analysis, the data were well fit to a five factor model. For subjects multiply (but not singly) exposed to anaesthesia, a factor reflecting motor skills, visual-motor integration, and processing speed was significantly lower [standardised difference of –0.35 (95% confidence interval {CI} –0.57 to –0.13)] compared with unexposed subjects. No other factor was associated with exposure. Three groups were identified in the cluster analysis, with 106 subjects (10.6%) in Cluster A (lowest performance in most tests), 557 (55.9%) in Cluster B, and 334 (33.5%) in Cluster C (highest performance in most tests). The odds of multiply exposed children belonging to Cluster A was 2.83 (95% CI: 1.49–5.35; P=0.001) compared with belonging to Cluster B; there was no other significant association between exposure status and cluster membership. Conclusions: Multiple, but not single, exposures to procedures requiring general anaesthesia before age 3 yr are associated with a specific pattern of deficits in neuropsychological tests. Factors predicting which children develop the most pronounced deficits remain unknown.
KW - developmental
KW - factor analysis
KW - general anaesthesia
KW - intelligence testing
KW - neurodevelopment
KW - neuropsychological
KW - psychology
KW - tests
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061894156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061894156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.022
DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 30982593
AN - SCOPUS:85061894156
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 122
SP - 671
EP - 681
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 5
ER -