TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient perspectives on testing for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential
AU - Sella, Tal
AU - Fell, Geoffrey G.
AU - Miller, Peter G.
AU - Gibson, Christopher J.
AU - Rosenberg, Shoshana M.
AU - Snow, Craig
AU - Stover, Daniel G.
AU - Ruddy, Kathryn J.
AU - Peppercorn, Jeffrey M.
AU - Schapira, Lidia
AU - Borges, Virginia F.
AU - Come, Steven E.
AU - Warner, Ellen
AU - Frank, Elizabeth
AU - Neuberg, Donna S.
AU - Ebert, Benjamin L.
AU - Partridge, Ann H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Kate T. Bifolck, a full-time employee of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, for editing and submission assistance. This work was supported by the V Foundation for Cancer Research, Susan G. Komen, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. T.S. was supported by the American Physicians Fellowship for Medicine in Israel and the Pinchas Borenstein Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the V Foundation for Cancer Research, Susan G. Komen, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. T.S. was supported by the American Physicians Fellowship for Medicine in Israel and the Pinchas Borenstein Tal-piot Medical Leadership Program, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.
PY - 2022/12/27
Y1 - 2022/12/27
N2 - Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), an emerging biomarker for personalized risk-directed interventions, is increased in cancer survivors. However, little is known about patient preferences for CHIP testing. We surveyed participants in a prospective cohort study of young women with breast cancer (BC). The emailed survey included an introduction to CHIP and a vignette eliciting participants’ preferences for CHIP testing, considering sequentially: population-based 10-year risk of BC recurrence, hematologic malignancy, and heart disease; increased CHIP-associated risks; current CHIP management; dedicated CHIP clinic; and hypothetical CHIP treatment. Preference changes were evaluated using the McNemar test. The survey response rate was 82.2% (528/642). Median age at time of survey was 46 years and median time from diagnosis was 108 months. Only 5.9% had prior knowledge of CHIP. After vignette presentation, most survivors (87.1%) recommended CHIP testing for the vignette patient. Presented next with CHIP-independent, population-based risks, 11.1% shifted their preference from testing to not testing. After receiving information about CHIP-associated risks, an additional 10.1% shifted their preference to testing. Preference for testing increased if vignette patient was offered a CHIP clinic or hypothetical CHIP treatment, with 7.2% and 14.1% switching preferences toward testing, respectively. Finally, 75.8% of participants desired CHIP testing for themselves. Among participants, 28.2% reported that learning about CHIP caused at least moderate anxiety. Most young survivors favored CHIP testing, with preferences influenced by risk presentation and potential management strategies. Our findings highlight the importance of risk communication and psychosocial support when considering biomarkers for future risk in cancer survivors.
AB - Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), an emerging biomarker for personalized risk-directed interventions, is increased in cancer survivors. However, little is known about patient preferences for CHIP testing. We surveyed participants in a prospective cohort study of young women with breast cancer (BC). The emailed survey included an introduction to CHIP and a vignette eliciting participants’ preferences for CHIP testing, considering sequentially: population-based 10-year risk of BC recurrence, hematologic malignancy, and heart disease; increased CHIP-associated risks; current CHIP management; dedicated CHIP clinic; and hypothetical CHIP treatment. Preference changes were evaluated using the McNemar test. The survey response rate was 82.2% (528/642). Median age at time of survey was 46 years and median time from diagnosis was 108 months. Only 5.9% had prior knowledge of CHIP. After vignette presentation, most survivors (87.1%) recommended CHIP testing for the vignette patient. Presented next with CHIP-independent, population-based risks, 11.1% shifted their preference from testing to not testing. After receiving information about CHIP-associated risks, an additional 10.1% shifted their preference to testing. Preference for testing increased if vignette patient was offered a CHIP clinic or hypothetical CHIP treatment, with 7.2% and 14.1% switching preferences toward testing, respectively. Finally, 75.8% of participants desired CHIP testing for themselves. Among participants, 28.2% reported that learning about CHIP caused at least moderate anxiety. Most young survivors favored CHIP testing, with preferences influenced by risk presentation and potential management strategies. Our findings highlight the importance of risk communication and psychosocial support when considering biomarkers for future risk in cancer survivors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147569414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147569414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008376
DO - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008376
M3 - Article
C2 - 36129839
AN - SCOPUS:85147569414
SN - 2473-9529
VL - 6
SP - 6151
EP - 6160
JO - Blood advances
JF - Blood advances
IS - 24
ER -