Parkinsonian motor features distinguish the agrammatic from logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia

Jonathan Graff-Radford, Joseph R. Duffy, Edythe A. Strand, Keith Anthony Josephs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Few studies have assessed parkinsonian motor features across variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Our objective was to compare degree of parkinsonian motor features between two PPA variants. Methods: Parkinsonian motor features were assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale in prospectively recruited PPA subjects, classified based on recently published criteria. Comparisons across groups were performed with Fisher's exact test for binary data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. Results: Twenty-three PPA subjects were diagnosed with logopenic (n = 11) or nonfluent/agrammatic (n = 12) aphasia. There were no significant differences in illness duration (agrammatic = 3.4 years; logopenic = 3.3 years) or age at onset (nonfluent/agrammatic = 67.3; logopenic = 62.0), but those with logopenic aphasia were more impaired on Mini-Mental State Examination (21.7/30 points vs. 26.1/30; p = 0.04). In contrast, those with logopenic aphasia had fewer parkinsonian motor features than those with agrammatic aphasia (5.7/132 vs. 16.8/132; p = 0.003) which was driven by bradykinesia (p = 0.02) and speech facial/expression (p = 0.04); less so rigidity (p = 0.06). Dysarthria was more frequent in the nonfluent/agrammatic subgroup. Conclusions: Nonfluent/agrammatic subjects have more parkinsonian motor features than logopenic subjects, likely reflecting underlying tau pathology in the agrammatic variant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)890-892
Number of pages3
JournalParkinsonism and Related Disorders
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Primary Progressive Aphasia
Aphasia
Dysarthria
Hypokinesia
Facial Expression
Nonparametric Statistics
Age of Onset
Parkinson Disease
Pathology

Keywords

  • Agrammatic aphasia
  • Extrapyramidal
  • Logopenic aphasia
  • Parkinsonism
  • Primary progressive aphasia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Parkinsonian motor features distinguish the agrammatic from logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia. / Graff-Radford, Jonathan; Duffy, Joseph R.; Strand, Edythe A.; Josephs, Keith Anthony.

In: Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, Vol. 18, No. 7, 08.2012, p. 890-892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64b29278f1b847079bc798cd12875e30,
title = "Parkinsonian motor features distinguish the agrammatic from logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia",
abstract = "Background: Few studies have assessed parkinsonian motor features across variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Our objective was to compare degree of parkinsonian motor features between two PPA variants. Methods: Parkinsonian motor features were assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale in prospectively recruited PPA subjects, classified based on recently published criteria. Comparisons across groups were performed with Fisher's exact test for binary data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. Results: Twenty-three PPA subjects were diagnosed with logopenic (n = 11) or nonfluent/agrammatic (n = 12) aphasia. There were no significant differences in illness duration (agrammatic = 3.4 years; logopenic = 3.3 years) or age at onset (nonfluent/agrammatic = 67.3; logopenic = 62.0), but those with logopenic aphasia were more impaired on Mini-Mental State Examination (21.7/30 points vs. 26.1/30; p = 0.04). In contrast, those with logopenic aphasia had fewer parkinsonian motor features than those with agrammatic aphasia (5.7/132 vs. 16.8/132; p = 0.003) which was driven by bradykinesia (p = 0.02) and speech facial/expression (p = 0.04); less so rigidity (p = 0.06). Dysarthria was more frequent in the nonfluent/agrammatic subgroup. Conclusions: Nonfluent/agrammatic subjects have more parkinsonian motor features than logopenic subjects, likely reflecting underlying tau pathology in the agrammatic variant.",
keywords = "Agrammatic aphasia, Extrapyramidal, Logopenic aphasia, Parkinsonism, Primary progressive aphasia",
author = "Jonathan Graff-Radford and Duffy, {Joseph R.} and Strand, {Edythe A.} and Josephs, {Keith Anthony}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.04.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "890--892",
journal = "Parkinsonism and Related Disorders",
issn = "1353-8020",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parkinsonian motor features distinguish the agrammatic from logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia

AU - Graff-Radford, Jonathan

AU - Duffy, Joseph R.

AU - Strand, Edythe A.

AU - Josephs, Keith Anthony

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Background: Few studies have assessed parkinsonian motor features across variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Our objective was to compare degree of parkinsonian motor features between two PPA variants. Methods: Parkinsonian motor features were assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale in prospectively recruited PPA subjects, classified based on recently published criteria. Comparisons across groups were performed with Fisher's exact test for binary data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. Results: Twenty-three PPA subjects were diagnosed with logopenic (n = 11) or nonfluent/agrammatic (n = 12) aphasia. There were no significant differences in illness duration (agrammatic = 3.4 years; logopenic = 3.3 years) or age at onset (nonfluent/agrammatic = 67.3; logopenic = 62.0), but those with logopenic aphasia were more impaired on Mini-Mental State Examination (21.7/30 points vs. 26.1/30; p = 0.04). In contrast, those with logopenic aphasia had fewer parkinsonian motor features than those with agrammatic aphasia (5.7/132 vs. 16.8/132; p = 0.003) which was driven by bradykinesia (p = 0.02) and speech facial/expression (p = 0.04); less so rigidity (p = 0.06). Dysarthria was more frequent in the nonfluent/agrammatic subgroup. Conclusions: Nonfluent/agrammatic subjects have more parkinsonian motor features than logopenic subjects, likely reflecting underlying tau pathology in the agrammatic variant.

AB - Background: Few studies have assessed parkinsonian motor features across variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Our objective was to compare degree of parkinsonian motor features between two PPA variants. Methods: Parkinsonian motor features were assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale in prospectively recruited PPA subjects, classified based on recently published criteria. Comparisons across groups were performed with Fisher's exact test for binary data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. Results: Twenty-three PPA subjects were diagnosed with logopenic (n = 11) or nonfluent/agrammatic (n = 12) aphasia. There were no significant differences in illness duration (agrammatic = 3.4 years; logopenic = 3.3 years) or age at onset (nonfluent/agrammatic = 67.3; logopenic = 62.0), but those with logopenic aphasia were more impaired on Mini-Mental State Examination (21.7/30 points vs. 26.1/30; p = 0.04). In contrast, those with logopenic aphasia had fewer parkinsonian motor features than those with agrammatic aphasia (5.7/132 vs. 16.8/132; p = 0.003) which was driven by bradykinesia (p = 0.02) and speech facial/expression (p = 0.04); less so rigidity (p = 0.06). Dysarthria was more frequent in the nonfluent/agrammatic subgroup. Conclusions: Nonfluent/agrammatic subjects have more parkinsonian motor features than logopenic subjects, likely reflecting underlying tau pathology in the agrammatic variant.

KW - Agrammatic aphasia

KW - Extrapyramidal

KW - Logopenic aphasia

KW - Parkinsonism

KW - Primary progressive aphasia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865324024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865324024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.04.011

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 890

EP - 892

JO - Parkinsonism and Related Disorders

JF - Parkinsonism and Related Disorders

SN - 1353-8020

IS - 7

ER -