TY - JOUR
T1 - Paravertebral blockade with propofol sedation versus general anesthesia for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
AU - Falkensammer, Juergen
AU - Hakaim, Albert G.
AU - Klocker, Josef
AU - Oldenburg, W. Andrew
AU - Biebl, Matthias
AU - Lau, Louis L.
AU - Neuhauser, Beate
AU - Mordecai, Monica
AU - Crawford, Claudia
AU - Greengrass, Roy
N1 - Funding Information:
A Vascular Surgery Research Grant from the William J. von Liebig Foundation supported the work of Matthias Biebl, Josef Klocker, Louis L. Lau, and Beate Neuhauser at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville.
PY - 2006/1
Y1 - 2006/1
N2 - The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of paravertebral blockade (PVB) for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with general anesthesia (GA). Data from patients who underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between August 2001 and July 2002 using PVB or GA were retrospectively reviewed and compared with respect to risk factors, intraoperative hemodynamic characteristics, operative outcome, and complications. Ten patients underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair under PVB, whereas 15 patients were operated on under GA. One conversion from PVB to GA was necessary for block failure. The perioperative (< 30 days) cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality were zero in both groups. The PVB group benefited significantly with respect to the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (p < .05) and blood pressure lability (p < .01), as well as postoperative nausea (p < .01). Our preliminary results indicate that PVB is feasible and can be performed safely in a patient population with significant comorbidities.
AB - The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of paravertebral blockade (PVB) for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with general anesthesia (GA). Data from patients who underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between August 2001 and July 2002 using PVB or GA were retrospectively reviewed and compared with respect to risk factors, intraoperative hemodynamic characteristics, operative outcome, and complications. Ten patients underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair under PVB, whereas 15 patients were operated on under GA. One conversion from PVB to GA was necessary for block failure. The perioperative (< 30 days) cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality were zero in both groups. The PVB group benefited significantly with respect to the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (p < .05) and blood pressure lability (p < .01), as well as postoperative nausea (p < .01). Our preliminary results indicate that PVB is feasible and can be performed safely in a patient population with significant comorbidities.
KW - Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
KW - General anesthesia
KW - Hemodynamic lability
KW - Paravertebral blockade
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745712094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745712094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2310/6670.2006.00009
DO - 10.2310/6670.2006.00009
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16849018
AN - SCOPUS:33745712094
SN - 1708-5381
VL - 14
SP - 17
EP - 22
JO - Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 1
ER -