Paravertebral blockade with propofol sedation versus general anesthesia for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Juergen Falkensammer, Albert Hakaim, Josef Klocker, W. Andrew Oldenburg, Matthias Biebl, Louis L. Lau, Beate Neuhauser, Monica Mordecai, Claudia Crawford, Roy Greengrass

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of paravertebral blockade (PVB) for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with general anesthesia (GA). Data from patients who underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between August 2001 and July 2002 using PVB or GA were retrospectively reviewed and compared with respect to risk factors, intraoperative hemodynamic characteristics, operative outcome, and complications. Ten patients underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair under PVB, whereas 15 patients were operated on under GA. One conversion from PVB to GA was necessary for block failure. The perioperative (< 30 days) cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality were zero in both groups. The PVB group benefited significantly with respect to the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (p < .05) and blood pressure lability (p < .01), as well as postoperative nausea (p < .01). Our preliminary results indicate that PVB is feasible and can be performed safely in a patient population with significant comorbidities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-22
Number of pages6
JournalVascular
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Propofol
General Anesthesia
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Hypotension
Comorbidity
Hemodynamics
Blood Pressure
Morbidity
Mortality
Incidence
Population

Keywords

  • Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
  • General anesthesia
  • Hemodynamic lability
  • Paravertebral blockade

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Surgery

Cite this

Paravertebral blockade with propofol sedation versus general anesthesia for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. / Falkensammer, Juergen; Hakaim, Albert; Klocker, Josef; Oldenburg, W. Andrew; Biebl, Matthias; Lau, Louis L.; Neuhauser, Beate; Mordecai, Monica; Crawford, Claudia; Greengrass, Roy.

In: Vascular, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 17-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Falkensammer, J, Hakaim, A, Klocker, J, Oldenburg, WA, Biebl, M, Lau, LL, Neuhauser, B, Mordecai, M, Crawford, C & Greengrass, R 2006, 'Paravertebral blockade with propofol sedation versus general anesthesia for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair', Vascular, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 17-22. https://doi.org/10.2310/6670.2006.00009
Falkensammer, Juergen ; Hakaim, Albert ; Klocker, Josef ; Oldenburg, W. Andrew ; Biebl, Matthias ; Lau, Louis L. ; Neuhauser, Beate ; Mordecai, Monica ; Crawford, Claudia ; Greengrass, Roy. / Paravertebral blockade with propofol sedation versus general anesthesia for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. In: Vascular. 2006 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 17-22.
@article{ebeafbb3033f4fd1938bf951c298f4c7,
title = "Paravertebral blockade with propofol sedation versus general anesthesia for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of paravertebral blockade (PVB) for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with general anesthesia (GA). Data from patients who underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between August 2001 and July 2002 using PVB or GA were retrospectively reviewed and compared with respect to risk factors, intraoperative hemodynamic characteristics, operative outcome, and complications. Ten patients underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair under PVB, whereas 15 patients were operated on under GA. One conversion from PVB to GA was necessary for block failure. The perioperative (< 30 days) cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality were zero in both groups. The PVB group benefited significantly with respect to the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (p < .05) and blood pressure lability (p < .01), as well as postoperative nausea (p < .01). Our preliminary results indicate that PVB is feasible and can be performed safely in a patient population with significant comorbidities.",
keywords = "Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, General anesthesia, Hemodynamic lability, Paravertebral blockade",
author = "Juergen Falkensammer and Albert Hakaim and Josef Klocker and Oldenburg, {W. Andrew} and Matthias Biebl and Lau, {Louis L.} and Beate Neuhauser and Monica Mordecai and Claudia Crawford and Roy Greengrass",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.2310/6670.2006.00009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "17--22",
journal = "Vascular",
issn = "1708-5381",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paravertebral blockade with propofol sedation versus general anesthesia for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

AU - Falkensammer, Juergen

AU - Hakaim, Albert

AU - Klocker, Josef

AU - Oldenburg, W. Andrew

AU - Biebl, Matthias

AU - Lau, Louis L.

AU - Neuhauser, Beate

AU - Mordecai, Monica

AU - Crawford, Claudia

AU - Greengrass, Roy

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of paravertebral blockade (PVB) for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with general anesthesia (GA). Data from patients who underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between August 2001 and July 2002 using PVB or GA were retrospectively reviewed and compared with respect to risk factors, intraoperative hemodynamic characteristics, operative outcome, and complications. Ten patients underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair under PVB, whereas 15 patients were operated on under GA. One conversion from PVB to GA was necessary for block failure. The perioperative (< 30 days) cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality were zero in both groups. The PVB group benefited significantly with respect to the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (p < .05) and blood pressure lability (p < .01), as well as postoperative nausea (p < .01). Our preliminary results indicate that PVB is feasible and can be performed safely in a patient population with significant comorbidities.

AB - The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of paravertebral blockade (PVB) for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with general anesthesia (GA). Data from patients who underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between August 2001 and July 2002 using PVB or GA were retrospectively reviewed and compared with respect to risk factors, intraoperative hemodynamic characteristics, operative outcome, and complications. Ten patients underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair under PVB, whereas 15 patients were operated on under GA. One conversion from PVB to GA was necessary for block failure. The perioperative (< 30 days) cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality were zero in both groups. The PVB group benefited significantly with respect to the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (p < .05) and blood pressure lability (p < .01), as well as postoperative nausea (p < .01). Our preliminary results indicate that PVB is feasible and can be performed safely in a patient population with significant comorbidities.

KW - Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

KW - General anesthesia

KW - Hemodynamic lability

KW - Paravertebral blockade

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745712094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745712094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2310/6670.2006.00009

DO - 10.2310/6670.2006.00009

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16849018

AN - SCOPUS:33745712094

VL - 14

SP - 17

EP - 22

JO - Vascular

JF - Vascular

SN - 1708-5381

IS - 1

ER -