Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - Report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group

Alec J. Megibow, Xiao H. Zhou, Heidrun Rotterdam, Isaac R. Francis, Elias A. Zerhouni, Dennis M. Balfe, Jeffrey C. Weinreb, Alex Aisen, Janet Kuhlman, Jay Heiken, Constantine Gatsonis, Barbara J. McNeil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

229 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare findings with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to determine optimal pulse sequences for MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans and MR images were compared of 189 adult patients with known or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Levels of confidence were correlated with surgical and pathologic results. RESULTS: The accuracy of CT was 0.73 and of MR imaging was 0.70. The negative predictive value of CT was 0.28 and of MR imaging was 0.23. The positive predictive value of CT was 0.89 and of MR imaging was 0.88. Gradient-echo and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences ranked equally in evaluation of vascular invasion, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for assessing lymphadenopathy, and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for detecting hepatic metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional imaging modalities are useful in the identification of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. CT is recommended for initial imaging assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-332
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume195
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiology
Adenocarcinoma
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Blood Vessels
Pancreas
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Neoplasm Metastasis
Liver

Keywords

  • Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies
  • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies
  • Pancreas, CT
  • Pancreas, MR
  • Pancreas, neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Megibow, A. J., Zhou, X. H., Rotterdam, H., Francis, I. R., Zerhouni, E. A., Balfe, D. M., ... McNeil, B. J. (1995). Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - Report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group. Radiology, 195(2), 327-332. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724748

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma : CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - Report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group. / Megibow, Alec J.; Zhou, Xiao H.; Rotterdam, Heidrun; Francis, Isaac R.; Zerhouni, Elias A.; Balfe, Dennis M.; Weinreb, Jeffrey C.; Aisen, Alex; Kuhlman, Janet; Heiken, Jay; Gatsonis, Constantine; McNeil, Barbara J.

In: Radiology, Vol. 195, No. 2, 01.01.1995, p. 327-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Megibow, AJ, Zhou, XH, Rotterdam, H, Francis, IR, Zerhouni, EA, Balfe, DM, Weinreb, JC, Aisen, A, Kuhlman, J, Heiken, J, Gatsonis, C & McNeil, BJ 1995, 'Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - Report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group', Radiology, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 327-332. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724748
Megibow, Alec J. ; Zhou, Xiao H. ; Rotterdam, Heidrun ; Francis, Isaac R. ; Zerhouni, Elias A. ; Balfe, Dennis M. ; Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ; Aisen, Alex ; Kuhlman, Janet ; Heiken, Jay ; Gatsonis, Constantine ; McNeil, Barbara J. / Pancreatic adenocarcinoma : CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - Report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group. In: Radiology. 1995 ; Vol. 195, No. 2. pp. 327-332.
@article{b53f86cac63a441f94edb4c72ff66dee,
title = "Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - Report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare findings with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to determine optimal pulse sequences for MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans and MR images were compared of 189 adult patients with known or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Levels of confidence were correlated with surgical and pathologic results. RESULTS: The accuracy of CT was 0.73 and of MR imaging was 0.70. The negative predictive value of CT was 0.28 and of MR imaging was 0.23. The positive predictive value of CT was 0.89 and of MR imaging was 0.88. Gradient-echo and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences ranked equally in evaluation of vascular invasion, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for assessing lymphadenopathy, and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for detecting hepatic metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional imaging modalities are useful in the identification of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. CT is recommended for initial imaging assessment.",
keywords = "Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, Pancreas, CT, Pancreas, MR, Pancreas, neoplasms",
author = "Megibow, {Alec J.} and Zhou, {Xiao H.} and Heidrun Rotterdam and Francis, {Isaac R.} and Zerhouni, {Elias A.} and Balfe, {Dennis M.} and Weinreb, {Jeffrey C.} and Alex Aisen and Janet Kuhlman and Jay Heiken and Constantine Gatsonis and McNeil, {Barbara J.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724748",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "195",
pages = "327--332",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

T2 - CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - Report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group

AU - Megibow, Alec J.

AU - Zhou, Xiao H.

AU - Rotterdam, Heidrun

AU - Francis, Isaac R.

AU - Zerhouni, Elias A.

AU - Balfe, Dennis M.

AU - Weinreb, Jeffrey C.

AU - Aisen, Alex

AU - Kuhlman, Janet

AU - Heiken, Jay

AU - Gatsonis, Constantine

AU - McNeil, Barbara J.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare findings with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to determine optimal pulse sequences for MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans and MR images were compared of 189 adult patients with known or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Levels of confidence were correlated with surgical and pathologic results. RESULTS: The accuracy of CT was 0.73 and of MR imaging was 0.70. The negative predictive value of CT was 0.28 and of MR imaging was 0.23. The positive predictive value of CT was 0.89 and of MR imaging was 0.88. Gradient-echo and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences ranked equally in evaluation of vascular invasion, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for assessing lymphadenopathy, and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for detecting hepatic metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional imaging modalities are useful in the identification of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. CT is recommended for initial imaging assessment.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare findings with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to determine optimal pulse sequences for MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans and MR images were compared of 189 adult patients with known or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Levels of confidence were correlated with surgical and pathologic results. RESULTS: The accuracy of CT was 0.73 and of MR imaging was 0.70. The negative predictive value of CT was 0.28 and of MR imaging was 0.23. The positive predictive value of CT was 0.89 and of MR imaging was 0.88. Gradient-echo and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences ranked equally in evaluation of vascular invasion, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for assessing lymphadenopathy, and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for detecting hepatic metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional imaging modalities are useful in the identification of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. CT is recommended for initial imaging assessment.

KW - Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies

KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies

KW - Pancreas, CT

KW - Pancreas, MR

KW - Pancreas, neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028968740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028968740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724748

DO - 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724748

M3 - Article

C2 - 7724748

AN - SCOPUS:0028968740

VL - 195

SP - 327

EP - 332

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -