Outcomes of critical illness: What is meaningful?

Ognjen Gajic, Sumera R. Ahmad, Michael Wilson, David A. Kaufman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review In this review, we will discuss efforts and challenges in understanding and developing meaningful outcomes of critical care research, quality improvement and policy, which are patient-centered and goal concordant, rather than mortality alone. We shall discuss different aspects of what could constitute outcomes of critical illness as meaningful to the patients and other stakeholders, including families and providers. Recent findings Different outcome pathways after critical illness impact the patients, families and providers in multiple ways. For patients who die, it is important to consider the experience of dying. For the increasing number of survivors of critical illness, challenges of survival have surfaced. The physical, mental and social debility that survivors experience has evolved into the entity called post-ICU syndrome. The importance of prehospital health state trajectory and the need for the outcome of critical care to be aligned with the patients’ goals and preferences have been increasingly recognized. Summary A theoretical framework is outlined to help understand the impact of critical care interventions on outcomes that are meaningful to patients, families and healthcare providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)394-400
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Critical Care
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Critical Illness
Survivors
Patient Preference
Critical Care
Quality Improvement
Health Personnel
Survival
Mortality
Health
Research
Critical Care Outcomes

Keywords

  • Critical illness
  • Dying
  • Patient-centered outcomes
  • Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Outcomes of critical illness : What is meaningful? / Gajic, Ognjen; Ahmad, Sumera R.; Wilson, Michael; Kaufman, David A.

In: Current Opinion in Critical Care, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.01.2018, p. 394-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gajic, Ognjen ; Ahmad, Sumera R. ; Wilson, Michael ; Kaufman, David A. / Outcomes of critical illness : What is meaningful?. In: Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 394-400.
@article{d888d7229e624621ab93c248d69fe6f1,
title = "Outcomes of critical illness: What is meaningful?",
abstract = "Purpose of review In this review, we will discuss efforts and challenges in understanding and developing meaningful outcomes of critical care research, quality improvement and policy, which are patient-centered and goal concordant, rather than mortality alone. We shall discuss different aspects of what could constitute outcomes of critical illness as meaningful to the patients and other stakeholders, including families and providers. Recent findings Different outcome pathways after critical illness impact the patients, families and providers in multiple ways. For patients who die, it is important to consider the experience of dying. For the increasing number of survivors of critical illness, challenges of survival have surfaced. The physical, mental and social debility that survivors experience has evolved into the entity called post-ICU syndrome. The importance of prehospital health state trajectory and the need for the outcome of critical care to be aligned with the patients’ goals and preferences have been increasingly recognized. Summary A theoretical framework is outlined to help understand the impact of critical care interventions on outcomes that are meaningful to patients, families and healthcare providers.",
keywords = "Critical illness, Dying, Patient-centered outcomes, Survival",
author = "Ognjen Gajic and Ahmad, {Sumera R.} and Michael Wilson and Kaufman, {David A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MCC.0000000000000530",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "394--400",
journal = "Current Opinion in Critical Care",
issn = "1070-5295",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of critical illness

T2 - What is meaningful?

AU - Gajic, Ognjen

AU - Ahmad, Sumera R.

AU - Wilson, Michael

AU - Kaufman, David A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose of review In this review, we will discuss efforts and challenges in understanding and developing meaningful outcomes of critical care research, quality improvement and policy, which are patient-centered and goal concordant, rather than mortality alone. We shall discuss different aspects of what could constitute outcomes of critical illness as meaningful to the patients and other stakeholders, including families and providers. Recent findings Different outcome pathways after critical illness impact the patients, families and providers in multiple ways. For patients who die, it is important to consider the experience of dying. For the increasing number of survivors of critical illness, challenges of survival have surfaced. The physical, mental and social debility that survivors experience has evolved into the entity called post-ICU syndrome. The importance of prehospital health state trajectory and the need for the outcome of critical care to be aligned with the patients’ goals and preferences have been increasingly recognized. Summary A theoretical framework is outlined to help understand the impact of critical care interventions on outcomes that are meaningful to patients, families and healthcare providers.

AB - Purpose of review In this review, we will discuss efforts and challenges in understanding and developing meaningful outcomes of critical care research, quality improvement and policy, which are patient-centered and goal concordant, rather than mortality alone. We shall discuss different aspects of what could constitute outcomes of critical illness as meaningful to the patients and other stakeholders, including families and providers. Recent findings Different outcome pathways after critical illness impact the patients, families and providers in multiple ways. For patients who die, it is important to consider the experience of dying. For the increasing number of survivors of critical illness, challenges of survival have surfaced. The physical, mental and social debility that survivors experience has evolved into the entity called post-ICU syndrome. The importance of prehospital health state trajectory and the need for the outcome of critical care to be aligned with the patients’ goals and preferences have been increasingly recognized. Summary A theoretical framework is outlined to help understand the impact of critical care interventions on outcomes that are meaningful to patients, families and healthcare providers.

KW - Critical illness

KW - Dying

KW - Patient-centered outcomes

KW - Survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064127494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064127494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000530

DO - 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000530

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30045089

AN - SCOPUS:85064127494

VL - 24

SP - 394

EP - 400

JO - Current Opinion in Critical Care

JF - Current Opinion in Critical Care

SN - 1070-5295

IS - 5

ER -