Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular quadripolar leads

Mei Yang, Xuping Li, Jinjun Liang, Samuel J Asirvatham, Raul Emilio Espinosa, Yigang Li, Paul Andrew Friedman, Yong-Mei Cha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads provide a more optimal pacing configuration for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than conventional bipolar leads. The objective of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes of CRT using quadripolar leads. Methods: This study included 516 CRT patients who received bipolar LV leads (n = 278) or quadripolar LV leads (n = 238) from January 2013 to June 2016. Data were retrospectively collected from a prospective CRT database and electronic health records. CRT response to CRT was defined as >5% improvement in the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. Results: New York Heart Association Functional Classification and LVEF significantly improved in the quadripolar and bipolar groups after CRT. There was no difference in the all-cause mortality rate. The implant success rate was significantly higher in the quadripolar group (100% vs 97.8%; P = 0.02). Quadripolar lead placement was an independent predictor of CRT response at 12 months (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.98; P = 0.04). The rate of LV lead–related complications requiring invasive lead revision or abandonment was significantly higher in the bipolar group (11.2% vs 4.6%; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Quadripolar leads achieve similar CRT outcomes as bipolar LV leads but with a higher implant success rate and fewer procedure-related complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)912-919
Number of pages8
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Electronic Health Records
Stroke Volume
Databases
Confidence Intervals
Mortality

Keywords

  • bipolar lead
  • cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • complication
  • quadripolar lead

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular quadripolar leads. / Yang, Mei; Li, Xuping; Liang, Jinjun; Asirvatham, Samuel J; Espinosa, Raul Emilio; Li, Yigang; Friedman, Paul Andrew; Cha, Yong-Mei.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 41, No. 8, 01.08.2018, p. 912-919.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac745cc1396546adbe58eea47e10637c,
title = "Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular quadripolar leads",
abstract = "Background: Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads provide a more optimal pacing configuration for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than conventional bipolar leads. The objective of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes of CRT using quadripolar leads. Methods: This study included 516 CRT patients who received bipolar LV leads (n = 278) or quadripolar LV leads (n = 238) from January 2013 to June 2016. Data were retrospectively collected from a prospective CRT database and electronic health records. CRT response to CRT was defined as >5{\%} improvement in the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. Results: New York Heart Association Functional Classification and LVEF significantly improved in the quadripolar and bipolar groups after CRT. There was no difference in the all-cause mortality rate. The implant success rate was significantly higher in the quadripolar group (100{\%} vs 97.8{\%}; P = 0.02). Quadripolar lead placement was an independent predictor of CRT response at 12 months (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.58–0.98; P = 0.04). The rate of LV lead–related complications requiring invasive lead revision or abandonment was significantly higher in the bipolar group (11.2{\%} vs 4.6{\%}; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Quadripolar leads achieve similar CRT outcomes as bipolar LV leads but with a higher implant success rate and fewer procedure-related complications.",
keywords = "bipolar lead, cardiac resynchronization therapy, complication, quadripolar lead",
author = "Mei Yang and Xuping Li and Jinjun Liang and Asirvatham, {Samuel J} and Espinosa, {Raul Emilio} and Yigang Li and Friedman, {Paul Andrew} and Yong-Mei Cha",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pace.13388",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "912--919",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular quadripolar leads

AU - Yang, Mei

AU - Li, Xuping

AU - Liang, Jinjun

AU - Asirvatham, Samuel J

AU - Espinosa, Raul Emilio

AU - Li, Yigang

AU - Friedman, Paul Andrew

AU - Cha, Yong-Mei

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Background: Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads provide a more optimal pacing configuration for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than conventional bipolar leads. The objective of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes of CRT using quadripolar leads. Methods: This study included 516 CRT patients who received bipolar LV leads (n = 278) or quadripolar LV leads (n = 238) from January 2013 to June 2016. Data were retrospectively collected from a prospective CRT database and electronic health records. CRT response to CRT was defined as >5% improvement in the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. Results: New York Heart Association Functional Classification and LVEF significantly improved in the quadripolar and bipolar groups after CRT. There was no difference in the all-cause mortality rate. The implant success rate was significantly higher in the quadripolar group (100% vs 97.8%; P = 0.02). Quadripolar lead placement was an independent predictor of CRT response at 12 months (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.98; P = 0.04). The rate of LV lead–related complications requiring invasive lead revision or abandonment was significantly higher in the bipolar group (11.2% vs 4.6%; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Quadripolar leads achieve similar CRT outcomes as bipolar LV leads but with a higher implant success rate and fewer procedure-related complications.

AB - Background: Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads provide a more optimal pacing configuration for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than conventional bipolar leads. The objective of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes of CRT using quadripolar leads. Methods: This study included 516 CRT patients who received bipolar LV leads (n = 278) or quadripolar LV leads (n = 238) from January 2013 to June 2016. Data were retrospectively collected from a prospective CRT database and electronic health records. CRT response to CRT was defined as >5% improvement in the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. Results: New York Heart Association Functional Classification and LVEF significantly improved in the quadripolar and bipolar groups after CRT. There was no difference in the all-cause mortality rate. The implant success rate was significantly higher in the quadripolar group (100% vs 97.8%; P = 0.02). Quadripolar lead placement was an independent predictor of CRT response at 12 months (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.98; P = 0.04). The rate of LV lead–related complications requiring invasive lead revision or abandonment was significantly higher in the bipolar group (11.2% vs 4.6%; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Quadripolar leads achieve similar CRT outcomes as bipolar LV leads but with a higher implant success rate and fewer procedure-related complications.

KW - bipolar lead

KW - cardiac resynchronization therapy

KW - complication

KW - quadripolar lead

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050963857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050963857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pace.13388

DO - 10.1111/pace.13388

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050963857

VL - 41

SP - 912

EP - 919

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 8

ER -