TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection of pathologically staged T1b esophageal cancer
T2 - a multicenter study
AU - Joseph, Abel
AU - Draganov, Peter V.
AU - Maluf-Filho, Fauze
AU - Aihara, Hiroyuki
AU - Fukami, Norio
AU - Sharma, Neil R.
AU - Chak, Amitabh
AU - Yang, Dennis
AU - Jawaid, Salmaan
AU - Dumot, John
AU - Alaber, Omar
AU - Chua, Tiffany
AU - Singh, Rituraj
AU - Mejia-Perez, Lady Katherine
AU - Lyu, Ruishen
AU - Zhang, Xuefeng
AU - Kamath, Suneel
AU - Jang, Sunguk
AU - Murthy, Sudish
AU - Vargo, John
AU - Bhatt, Amit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background and Aims: The outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for T1b esophageal cancer (EC) and its recurrence rates remain unclear in the West. Using a multicenter cohort, we evaluated technical outcomes and recurrence rates of ESD in the treatment of pathologically staged T1b EC. Methods: We included patients who underwent ESD of T1b EC at 7 academic tertiary referral centers in the United States (n = 6) and Brazil (n = 1). We analyzed demographic, procedural, and histopathologic characteristics and follow-up data. Time-to-event analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence rates. Results: Sixty-six patients with pathologically staged T1b EC after ESD were included in the study. A preprocedure staging EUS was available in 54 patients and was Tis/T1a in 27 patients (50%) and T1b in 27 patients (50%). En-bloc resection rate was 92.4% (61/66) and R0 resection rate was 54.5% (36/66). Forty-nine of 66 patients (74.2%) did not undergo surgery immediately after resection and went on to surveillance. Ten patients had ESD resection within the curative criteria, and no recurrences were seen in a 13-month (range, 3-18.5) follow-up period in these patients. Ten of 39 patients (25.6%) with noncurative resections had residual/recurrent disease. Of the 10 patients with noncurative resection, local recurrence alone was seen in 5 patients (12.8%) and metastatic recurrence in 5 patients (12.8%). On univariate analysis, R1 resection had a higher risk of recurrent disease (hazard ratio, 6.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-30.36; P = .023). Conclusions: EUS staging of T1b EC has poor accuracy, and a staging ESD should be considered in these patients. ESD R0 resection rates were low in T1b EC, and R1 resection was associated with recurrent disease. Patients with noncurative ESD resection of T1b EC who cannot undergo surgery should be surveyed closely, because recurrent disease was seen in 25% of these patients.
AB - Background and Aims: The outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for T1b esophageal cancer (EC) and its recurrence rates remain unclear in the West. Using a multicenter cohort, we evaluated technical outcomes and recurrence rates of ESD in the treatment of pathologically staged T1b EC. Methods: We included patients who underwent ESD of T1b EC at 7 academic tertiary referral centers in the United States (n = 6) and Brazil (n = 1). We analyzed demographic, procedural, and histopathologic characteristics and follow-up data. Time-to-event analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence rates. Results: Sixty-six patients with pathologically staged T1b EC after ESD were included in the study. A preprocedure staging EUS was available in 54 patients and was Tis/T1a in 27 patients (50%) and T1b in 27 patients (50%). En-bloc resection rate was 92.4% (61/66) and R0 resection rate was 54.5% (36/66). Forty-nine of 66 patients (74.2%) did not undergo surgery immediately after resection and went on to surveillance. Ten patients had ESD resection within the curative criteria, and no recurrences were seen in a 13-month (range, 3-18.5) follow-up period in these patients. Ten of 39 patients (25.6%) with noncurative resections had residual/recurrent disease. Of the 10 patients with noncurative resection, local recurrence alone was seen in 5 patients (12.8%) and metastatic recurrence in 5 patients (12.8%). On univariate analysis, R1 resection had a higher risk of recurrent disease (hazard ratio, 6.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-30.36; P = .023). Conclusions: EUS staging of T1b EC has poor accuracy, and a staging ESD should be considered in these patients. ESD R0 resection rates were low in T1b EC, and R1 resection was associated with recurrent disease. Patients with noncurative ESD resection of T1b EC who cannot undergo surgery should be surveyed closely, because recurrent disease was seen in 25% of these patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129922824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129922824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.018
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 35217020
AN - SCOPUS:85129922824
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 96
SP - 445
EP - 453
JO - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
IS - 3
ER -