Outcomes following surgical versus endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anshit Goyal, Joseph Cesare, Victor M. Lu, Mohammed Ali Alvi, Panagiotis Kerezoudis, Waleed Brinjikji, Deena Nasr, Guiseppe Lanzino, Mohamad Bydon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Although surgical resection is associated with a complete cure in most cases of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF), there has been an increasing trend towards embolisation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical resection with endovascular treatment in terms of success of treatment, rate of recurrence and complications. A literature search was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group system. Surgical outcomes such as initial treatment failure, late recurrence, neurological improvement and complications were compared between the two approaches. We included 57 studies with 2029 patients, of which 32 studies with 1341 patients directly compared surgery (n=590) and embolisation (n=751). Surgery was found to be associated with significantly lower odds of initial treatment failure (OR: 0.15, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.24, I2 0%, p<0.001) and late recurrence (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.39, I2 0%, p<0.001). The odds of neurological improvement following surgery were also significantly higher compared with embolisation alone (OR: 2.73, CI:1.67 to 4.48, I2:49.5%, p<0.001). No difference in complication rates was observed between the two approaches (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.26, I2 0%, p=0.063). Onyx was associated with significantly higher odds of initial failure/late recurrence as compared with n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (OR: 3.87, CI: 1.73 to 8.68, I2:0%, p<0.001). Surgery may be associated with superior outcomes for SDAVFs in comparison to endovascular occlusion. Newer embolisation agents like Onyx have not conferred a significant improvement in occlusion rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations
Meta-Analysis
Recurrence
Treatment Failure
Enbucrilate
Therapeutics
Guidelines

Keywords

  • arteriovenous malformations
  • complications
  • embolisation
  • endovascular
  • meta-analysis
  • recurrence
  • SDAVF
  • spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas
  • surgery
  • systematic review
  • treatment failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Outcomes following surgical versus endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Goyal, Anshit; Cesare, Joseph; Lu, Victor M.; Alvi, Mohammed Ali; Kerezoudis, Panagiotis; Brinjikji, Waleed; Nasr, Deena; Lanzino, Guiseppe; Bydon, Mohamad.

In: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Goyal, Anshit ; Cesare, Joseph ; Lu, Victor M. ; Alvi, Mohammed Ali ; Kerezoudis, Panagiotis ; Brinjikji, Waleed ; Nasr, Deena ; Lanzino, Guiseppe ; Bydon, Mohamad. / Outcomes following surgical versus endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 2019.
@article{9c96b2c2fd0440239215eaf0f6ac6ee9,
title = "Outcomes following surgical versus endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Although surgical resection is associated with a complete cure in most cases of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF), there has been an increasing trend towards embolisation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical resection with endovascular treatment in terms of success of treatment, rate of recurrence and complications. A literature search was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group system. Surgical outcomes such as initial treatment failure, late recurrence, neurological improvement and complications were compared between the two approaches. We included 57 studies with 2029 patients, of which 32 studies with 1341 patients directly compared surgery (n=590) and embolisation (n=751). Surgery was found to be associated with significantly lower odds of initial treatment failure (OR: 0.15, 95{\%} CI 0.09 to 0.24, I2 0{\%}, p<0.001) and late recurrence (OR 0.18, 95{\%} CI 0.09 to 0.39, I2 0{\%}, p<0.001). The odds of neurological improvement following surgery were also significantly higher compared with embolisation alone (OR: 2.73, CI:1.67 to 4.48, I2:49.5{\%}, p<0.001). No difference in complication rates was observed between the two approaches (OR 1.78, 95{\%} CI 0.97 to 3.26, I2 0{\%}, p=0.063). Onyx was associated with significantly higher odds of initial failure/late recurrence as compared with n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (OR: 3.87, CI: 1.73 to 8.68, I2:0{\%}, p<0.001). Surgery may be associated with superior outcomes for SDAVFs in comparison to endovascular occlusion. Newer embolisation agents like Onyx have not conferred a significant improvement in occlusion rate.",
keywords = "arteriovenous malformations, complications, embolisation, endovascular, meta-analysis, recurrence, SDAVF, spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas, surgery, systematic review, treatment failure",
author = "Anshit Goyal and Joseph Cesare and Lu, {Victor M.} and Alvi, {Mohammed Ali} and Panagiotis Kerezoudis and Waleed Brinjikji and Deena Nasr and Guiseppe Lanzino and Mohamad Bydon",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jnnp-2019-320648",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry",
issn = "0022-3050",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes following surgical versus endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Goyal, Anshit

AU - Cesare, Joseph

AU - Lu, Victor M.

AU - Alvi, Mohammed Ali

AU - Kerezoudis, Panagiotis

AU - Brinjikji, Waleed

AU - Nasr, Deena

AU - Lanzino, Guiseppe

AU - Bydon, Mohamad

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Although surgical resection is associated with a complete cure in most cases of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF), there has been an increasing trend towards embolisation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical resection with endovascular treatment in terms of success of treatment, rate of recurrence and complications. A literature search was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group system. Surgical outcomes such as initial treatment failure, late recurrence, neurological improvement and complications were compared between the two approaches. We included 57 studies with 2029 patients, of which 32 studies with 1341 patients directly compared surgery (n=590) and embolisation (n=751). Surgery was found to be associated with significantly lower odds of initial treatment failure (OR: 0.15, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.24, I2 0%, p<0.001) and late recurrence (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.39, I2 0%, p<0.001). The odds of neurological improvement following surgery were also significantly higher compared with embolisation alone (OR: 2.73, CI:1.67 to 4.48, I2:49.5%, p<0.001). No difference in complication rates was observed between the two approaches (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.26, I2 0%, p=0.063). Onyx was associated with significantly higher odds of initial failure/late recurrence as compared with n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (OR: 3.87, CI: 1.73 to 8.68, I2:0%, p<0.001). Surgery may be associated with superior outcomes for SDAVFs in comparison to endovascular occlusion. Newer embolisation agents like Onyx have not conferred a significant improvement in occlusion rate.

AB - Although surgical resection is associated with a complete cure in most cases of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF), there has been an increasing trend towards embolisation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical resection with endovascular treatment in terms of success of treatment, rate of recurrence and complications. A literature search was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group system. Surgical outcomes such as initial treatment failure, late recurrence, neurological improvement and complications were compared between the two approaches. We included 57 studies with 2029 patients, of which 32 studies with 1341 patients directly compared surgery (n=590) and embolisation (n=751). Surgery was found to be associated with significantly lower odds of initial treatment failure (OR: 0.15, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.24, I2 0%, p<0.001) and late recurrence (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.39, I2 0%, p<0.001). The odds of neurological improvement following surgery were also significantly higher compared with embolisation alone (OR: 2.73, CI:1.67 to 4.48, I2:49.5%, p<0.001). No difference in complication rates was observed between the two approaches (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.26, I2 0%, p=0.063). Onyx was associated with significantly higher odds of initial failure/late recurrence as compared with n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (OR: 3.87, CI: 1.73 to 8.68, I2:0%, p<0.001). Surgery may be associated with superior outcomes for SDAVFs in comparison to endovascular occlusion. Newer embolisation agents like Onyx have not conferred a significant improvement in occlusion rate.

KW - arteriovenous malformations

KW - complications

KW - embolisation

KW - endovascular

KW - meta-analysis

KW - recurrence

KW - SDAVF

KW - spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas

KW - surgery

KW - systematic review

KW - treatment failure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066491373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066491373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jnnp-2019-320648

DO - 10.1136/jnnp-2019-320648

M3 - Review article

JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

SN - 0022-3050

ER -