Outcomes after Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacement for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

Malini Madhavan, Jonathan W. Waks, Paul Andrew Friedman, Daniel B. Kramer, Alfred E. Buxton, Peter Noseworthy, Ramila A. Mehta, David O. Hodge, Angela Y. Higgins, Tracy L. Webster, Chance M. Witt, Yong-Mei Cha, Bernard J. Gersh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background-The effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden death in patients with an ejection fraction (EF) ≤35% and clinical heart failure is well established. However, outcomes after replacement of the ICD generator in patients with recovery of EF to >35% and no previous therapies are not well characterized. Methods and Results-Between 2001 and 2011, generator replacement was performed at 2 tertiary medical centers in 253 patients (mean age, 68.3±12.7 years; 82% men) who had previously undergone ICD placement for primary prevention but subsequently never received appropriate ICD therapy. EF had recovered to >35% in 72 of 253 (28%) patients at generator replacement. During median (quartiles) follow-up of 3.3 (1.8-5.3) years after generator replacement, 68 of 253 (27%) experienced appropriate ICD therapy. Patients with EF ≤35% were more likely to experience ICD therapy compared with those with EF >35% (12% versus 5% per year; hazard ratio, 3.57; P=0.001). On multivariable analysis, low EF predicted appropriate ICD therapy after generator replacement (hazard ratio, 1.96 [1.35-2.87] per 10% decrement; P=0.001). Death occurred in 25% of patients 5 years after generator replacement. Mortality was similar in patients with EF ≤35% and >35% (7% versus 5% per year; hazard ratio, 1.10; P=0.68). Atrial fibrillation (3.24 [1.63-6.43]; P35% at the time of generator replacement, these patients continue to be at significant risk for appropriate ICD therapy (5% per year). These data may inform decisions on ICD replacement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere003283
JournalCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Sudden Cardiac Death
Primary Prevention
Therapeutics
Sudden Death
Atrial Fibrillation
Heart Failure
Mortality

Keywords

  • cardiomyopathy
  • death, sudden
  • defibrillators, implantable
  • follow-up studies
  • left ventricular ejection fraction
  • primary prevention
  • shock

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Outcomes after Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacement for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. / Madhavan, Malini; Waks, Jonathan W.; Friedman, Paul Andrew; Kramer, Daniel B.; Buxton, Alfred E.; Noseworthy, Peter; Mehta, Ramila A.; Hodge, David O.; Higgins, Angela Y.; Webster, Tracy L.; Witt, Chance M.; Cha, Yong-Mei; Gersh, Bernard J.

In: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Vol. 9, No. 3, e003283, 01.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Madhavan, Malini ; Waks, Jonathan W. ; Friedman, Paul Andrew ; Kramer, Daniel B. ; Buxton, Alfred E. ; Noseworthy, Peter ; Mehta, Ramila A. ; Hodge, David O. ; Higgins, Angela Y. ; Webster, Tracy L. ; Witt, Chance M. ; Cha, Yong-Mei ; Gersh, Bernard J. / Outcomes after Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacement for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. In: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 3.
@article{06377edd7b614cb695124cd56fdfaae6,
title = "Outcomes after Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacement for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death",
abstract = "Background-The effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden death in patients with an ejection fraction (EF) ≤35{\%} and clinical heart failure is well established. However, outcomes after replacement of the ICD generator in patients with recovery of EF to >35{\%} and no previous therapies are not well characterized. Methods and Results-Between 2001 and 2011, generator replacement was performed at 2 tertiary medical centers in 253 patients (mean age, 68.3±12.7 years; 82{\%} men) who had previously undergone ICD placement for primary prevention but subsequently never received appropriate ICD therapy. EF had recovered to >35{\%} in 72 of 253 (28{\%}) patients at generator replacement. During median (quartiles) follow-up of 3.3 (1.8-5.3) years after generator replacement, 68 of 253 (27{\%}) experienced appropriate ICD therapy. Patients with EF ≤35{\%} were more likely to experience ICD therapy compared with those with EF >35{\%} (12{\%} versus 5{\%} per year; hazard ratio, 3.57; P=0.001). On multivariable analysis, low EF predicted appropriate ICD therapy after generator replacement (hazard ratio, 1.96 [1.35-2.87] per 10{\%} decrement; P=0.001). Death occurred in 25{\%} of patients 5 years after generator replacement. Mortality was similar in patients with EF ≤35{\%} and >35{\%} (7{\%} versus 5{\%} per year; hazard ratio, 1.10; P=0.68). Atrial fibrillation (3.24 [1.63-6.43]; P35{\%} at the time of generator replacement, these patients continue to be at significant risk for appropriate ICD therapy (5{\%} per year). These data may inform decisions on ICD replacement.",
keywords = "cardiomyopathy, death, sudden, defibrillators, implantable, follow-up studies, left ventricular ejection fraction, primary prevention, shock",
author = "Malini Madhavan and Waks, {Jonathan W.} and Friedman, {Paul Andrew} and Kramer, {Daniel B.} and Buxton, {Alfred E.} and Peter Noseworthy and Mehta, {Ramila A.} and Hodge, {David O.} and Higgins, {Angela Y.} and Webster, {Tracy L.} and Witt, {Chance M.} and Yong-Mei Cha and Gersh, {Bernard J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003283",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology",
issn = "1941-3149",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes after Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacement for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

AU - Madhavan, Malini

AU - Waks, Jonathan W.

AU - Friedman, Paul Andrew

AU - Kramer, Daniel B.

AU - Buxton, Alfred E.

AU - Noseworthy, Peter

AU - Mehta, Ramila A.

AU - Hodge, David O.

AU - Higgins, Angela Y.

AU - Webster, Tracy L.

AU - Witt, Chance M.

AU - Cha, Yong-Mei

AU - Gersh, Bernard J.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background-The effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden death in patients with an ejection fraction (EF) ≤35% and clinical heart failure is well established. However, outcomes after replacement of the ICD generator in patients with recovery of EF to >35% and no previous therapies are not well characterized. Methods and Results-Between 2001 and 2011, generator replacement was performed at 2 tertiary medical centers in 253 patients (mean age, 68.3±12.7 years; 82% men) who had previously undergone ICD placement for primary prevention but subsequently never received appropriate ICD therapy. EF had recovered to >35% in 72 of 253 (28%) patients at generator replacement. During median (quartiles) follow-up of 3.3 (1.8-5.3) years after generator replacement, 68 of 253 (27%) experienced appropriate ICD therapy. Patients with EF ≤35% were more likely to experience ICD therapy compared with those with EF >35% (12% versus 5% per year; hazard ratio, 3.57; P=0.001). On multivariable analysis, low EF predicted appropriate ICD therapy after generator replacement (hazard ratio, 1.96 [1.35-2.87] per 10% decrement; P=0.001). Death occurred in 25% of patients 5 years after generator replacement. Mortality was similar in patients with EF ≤35% and >35% (7% versus 5% per year; hazard ratio, 1.10; P=0.68). Atrial fibrillation (3.24 [1.63-6.43]; P35% at the time of generator replacement, these patients continue to be at significant risk for appropriate ICD therapy (5% per year). These data may inform decisions on ICD replacement.

AB - Background-The effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden death in patients with an ejection fraction (EF) ≤35% and clinical heart failure is well established. However, outcomes after replacement of the ICD generator in patients with recovery of EF to >35% and no previous therapies are not well characterized. Methods and Results-Between 2001 and 2011, generator replacement was performed at 2 tertiary medical centers in 253 patients (mean age, 68.3±12.7 years; 82% men) who had previously undergone ICD placement for primary prevention but subsequently never received appropriate ICD therapy. EF had recovered to >35% in 72 of 253 (28%) patients at generator replacement. During median (quartiles) follow-up of 3.3 (1.8-5.3) years after generator replacement, 68 of 253 (27%) experienced appropriate ICD therapy. Patients with EF ≤35% were more likely to experience ICD therapy compared with those with EF >35% (12% versus 5% per year; hazard ratio, 3.57; P=0.001). On multivariable analysis, low EF predicted appropriate ICD therapy after generator replacement (hazard ratio, 1.96 [1.35-2.87] per 10% decrement; P=0.001). Death occurred in 25% of patients 5 years after generator replacement. Mortality was similar in patients with EF ≤35% and >35% (7% versus 5% per year; hazard ratio, 1.10; P=0.68). Atrial fibrillation (3.24 [1.63-6.43]; P35% at the time of generator replacement, these patients continue to be at significant risk for appropriate ICD therapy (5% per year). These data may inform decisions on ICD replacement.

KW - cardiomyopathy

KW - death, sudden

KW - defibrillators, implantable

KW - follow-up studies

KW - left ventricular ejection fraction

KW - primary prevention

KW - shock

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962550631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962550631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003283

DO - 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003283

M3 - Article

C2 - 26921377

AN - SCOPUS:84962550631

VL - 9

JO - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

JF - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

SN - 1941-3149

IS - 3

M1 - e003283

ER -