Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcomes among cancer patients with preexisting coronary artery disease and cardiac stenting who subsequently underwent thoracic radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: From 1998 to 2012, 147 patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and then curative external beam RT (>30 Gy, except for Hodgkin lymphoma patients) involving the heart and the lungs. Heart-specific and lung-specific dosimetric parameters were correlated to overall survival (OS) and cardiac-specific survival by Cox variate methods. RESULTS: The mean interval between PCI and cancer diagnosis was 1.8 years (range, 0.1 to 14.2 y). Hypertension was present in 105 patients (71%), and hyperlipidemia in 82 (56%). At the time of analysis, 69 patients (47%) were alive, 3 (2%) died of cardiac causes, and 53 (36%) died of cancer. In multivariate analyses, OS since PCI was related to cancer type (P=0.004). Decreased OS since cancer diagnosis was related to older age (P<0.001) and increased percentage of targeted volume or organ receiving 20 Gy or more for lung (P<0.001), even after controlling for sex, cancer type, and stage. However, for non-cancer-specific survival and major adverse cardiac event-free survival, older age and underlying cardiopulmonary comorbidities dominated (rather than heart and lung dosimetric parameters) in predicting worse outcome for these patients with preexisting coronary artery disease who later underwent RT. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer type, older age, and preexisting cardiopulmonary comorbidities and risk factors most significantly predicted clinical outcome and survival for these patients with existing coronary stents who subsequently received thoracic RT. Dosimetric detrimental effects were not significant in our study.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - May 29 2014 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cancer Research
- Oncology
Cite this
Outcomes after curative thoracic radiotherapy in patients with coronary artery disease and existing cardiac stents. / Sio, Terence T.; Liang, Jackson J.; Chang, Kenneth; Novotny, Paul J.; Prasad, Abhiram; Miller, Robert C.
In: American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, 29.05.2014.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes after curative thoracic radiotherapy in patients with coronary artery disease and existing cardiac stents
AU - Sio, Terence T.
AU - Liang, Jackson J.
AU - Chang, Kenneth
AU - Novotny, Paul J.
AU - Prasad, Abhiram
AU - Miller, Robert C.
PY - 2014/5/29
Y1 - 2014/5/29
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcomes among cancer patients with preexisting coronary artery disease and cardiac stenting who subsequently underwent thoracic radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: From 1998 to 2012, 147 patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and then curative external beam RT (>30 Gy, except for Hodgkin lymphoma patients) involving the heart and the lungs. Heart-specific and lung-specific dosimetric parameters were correlated to overall survival (OS) and cardiac-specific survival by Cox variate methods. RESULTS: The mean interval between PCI and cancer diagnosis was 1.8 years (range, 0.1 to 14.2 y). Hypertension was present in 105 patients (71%), and hyperlipidemia in 82 (56%). At the time of analysis, 69 patients (47%) were alive, 3 (2%) died of cardiac causes, and 53 (36%) died of cancer. In multivariate analyses, OS since PCI was related to cancer type (P=0.004). Decreased OS since cancer diagnosis was related to older age (P<0.001) and increased percentage of targeted volume or organ receiving 20 Gy or more for lung (P<0.001), even after controlling for sex, cancer type, and stage. However, for non-cancer-specific survival and major adverse cardiac event-free survival, older age and underlying cardiopulmonary comorbidities dominated (rather than heart and lung dosimetric parameters) in predicting worse outcome for these patients with preexisting coronary artery disease who later underwent RT. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer type, older age, and preexisting cardiopulmonary comorbidities and risk factors most significantly predicted clinical outcome and survival for these patients with existing coronary stents who subsequently received thoracic RT. Dosimetric detrimental effects were not significant in our study.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcomes among cancer patients with preexisting coronary artery disease and cardiac stenting who subsequently underwent thoracic radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: From 1998 to 2012, 147 patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and then curative external beam RT (>30 Gy, except for Hodgkin lymphoma patients) involving the heart and the lungs. Heart-specific and lung-specific dosimetric parameters were correlated to overall survival (OS) and cardiac-specific survival by Cox variate methods. RESULTS: The mean interval between PCI and cancer diagnosis was 1.8 years (range, 0.1 to 14.2 y). Hypertension was present in 105 patients (71%), and hyperlipidemia in 82 (56%). At the time of analysis, 69 patients (47%) were alive, 3 (2%) died of cardiac causes, and 53 (36%) died of cancer. In multivariate analyses, OS since PCI was related to cancer type (P=0.004). Decreased OS since cancer diagnosis was related to older age (P<0.001) and increased percentage of targeted volume or organ receiving 20 Gy or more for lung (P<0.001), even after controlling for sex, cancer type, and stage. However, for non-cancer-specific survival and major adverse cardiac event-free survival, older age and underlying cardiopulmonary comorbidities dominated (rather than heart and lung dosimetric parameters) in predicting worse outcome for these patients with preexisting coronary artery disease who later underwent RT. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer type, older age, and preexisting cardiopulmonary comorbidities and risk factors most significantly predicted clinical outcome and survival for these patients with existing coronary stents who subsequently received thoracic RT. Dosimetric detrimental effects were not significant in our study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901385618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901385618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/COC.0000000000000092
DO - 10.1097/COC.0000000000000092
M3 - Article
C2 - 24879471
AN - SCOPUS:84901385618
JO - American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
JF - American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
SN - 0277-3732
ER -