TY - JOUR
T1 - Osteoporosis treatment
T2 - recent developments and ongoing challenges
AU - Khosla, Sundeep
AU - Hofbauer, Lorenz C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH grants P01 AG004875, AG048792, AR027065, and AR068275 (SK) and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grants Forschergruppe-1586 SKELMET, SFB-655, and Transregio-67 (LCH). We thank Franziska Lademann (Dresden Technical University, Germany) for her assistance with the figures.
Funding Information:
We searched PubMed for articles published between Jan 1, 1990, to April 30, 2017, with the terms “osteoporosis”, “bone loss”, and “fractures” in combination with the terms “randomised-controlled trials”, “bisphosphonates”, “denosumab”, “raloxifene”, “parathyroid hormone”, “strontium ranelate”, “sclerostin”, “abaloparatide”, or “cathepsin K”. Peer-reviewed full articles resulting from this search strategy and key references cited in those articles were reviewed. Only articles published in English were included. Contributors SK and LCH contributed equally to the overall content and are solely responsible for this Series paper. Declaration of interests SK declares no competing interests. LCH has received personal fees from Alexion (advisory board, lectures), Amgen (advisory board, lectures, clinical studies, research support), Eli Lilly (lectures), UCB (lectures), Radius (advisory board), and Merck (advisory board), unrelated to the present work. Acknowledgments This work was supported by NIH grants P01 AG004875, AG048792, AR027065, and AR068275 (SK) and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grants Forschergruppe-1586 SKELMET, SFB-655, and Transregio-67 (LCH). We thank Franziska Lademann (Dresden Technical University, Germany) for her assistance with the figures.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Osteoporosis is an enormous and growing public health problem. Once considered an inevitable consequence of ageing, it is now eminently preventable and treatable. Ironically, despite tremendous therapeutic advances, there is an increasing treatment gap for patients at high fracture risk. In this Series paper, we trace the evolution of drug therapy for osteoporosis, which began in the 1940s with the demonstration by Fuller Albright that treatment with oestrogen could reverse the negative calcium balance that developed in women after menopause or oophorectomy. We note a watershed in osteoporosis drug discovery around the year 2000, when the approach to developing novel therapeutics shifted from one driven by discoveries in animal studies and clinical observations (eg, oestrogen, calcitonin, and teriparatide) or opportunistic repurposing of existing compounds (eg, bisphosphonates) to one driven by advances in fundamental bone biology (eg, denosumab) coupled with clues from patients with rare bone diseases (eg, romosozumab, odanacatib). Despite these remarkable advances, concerns about rare side-effects of anti-resorptive drugs, particularly bisphosphonates, and the absence of clear evidence in support of their long-term efficacy is leading many patients who could benefit from drug therapy to not take these drugs. As such, there remains an important clinical need to develop ways to enhance patient acceptance and compliance with these effective drugs, and to continue to develop new drugs that do not cause these side-effects and have prolonged anabolic effects on bone. Such changes could lead to a true reversal of this potentially devastating disease of ageing.
AB - Osteoporosis is an enormous and growing public health problem. Once considered an inevitable consequence of ageing, it is now eminently preventable and treatable. Ironically, despite tremendous therapeutic advances, there is an increasing treatment gap for patients at high fracture risk. In this Series paper, we trace the evolution of drug therapy for osteoporosis, which began in the 1940s with the demonstration by Fuller Albright that treatment with oestrogen could reverse the negative calcium balance that developed in women after menopause or oophorectomy. We note a watershed in osteoporosis drug discovery around the year 2000, when the approach to developing novel therapeutics shifted from one driven by discoveries in animal studies and clinical observations (eg, oestrogen, calcitonin, and teriparatide) or opportunistic repurposing of existing compounds (eg, bisphosphonates) to one driven by advances in fundamental bone biology (eg, denosumab) coupled with clues from patients with rare bone diseases (eg, romosozumab, odanacatib). Despite these remarkable advances, concerns about rare side-effects of anti-resorptive drugs, particularly bisphosphonates, and the absence of clear evidence in support of their long-term efficacy is leading many patients who could benefit from drug therapy to not take these drugs. As such, there remains an important clinical need to develop ways to enhance patient acceptance and compliance with these effective drugs, and to continue to develop new drugs that do not cause these side-effects and have prolonged anabolic effects on bone. Such changes could lead to a true reversal of this potentially devastating disease of ageing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021991961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021991961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30188-2
DO - 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30188-2
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28689769
AN - SCOPUS:85021991961
SN - 2213-8587
VL - 5
SP - 898
EP - 907
JO - The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
JF - The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
IS - 11
ER -