TY - JOUR
T1 - Oral ixazomib-dexamethasone vs oral pomalidomide-dexamethasone for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed multiple myeloma
T2 - a randomized Phase 2 trial
AU - Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
AU - Schjesvold, Fredrik
AU - Doronin, Vadim
AU - Vinogradova, Olga
AU - Quach, Hang
AU - Leleu, Xavier
AU - Montes, Yolanda Gonzalez
AU - Ramasamy, Karthik
AU - Pompa, Alessandra
AU - Levin, Mark David
AU - Lee, Cindy
AU - Mellqvist, Ulf Henrik
AU - Fenk, Roland
AU - Demarquette, Hélène
AU - Sati, Hamdi
AU - Vorog, Alexander
AU - Labotka, Richard
AU - Du, Jichang
AU - Darif, Mohamed
AU - Kumar, Shaji
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. We thank the patients and their families, as well as the physicians, nurses, study coordinators, and research staff for participation in the trial; Renda Ferrari, PhD, and Thomas G. Hedberg, PhD, of Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA) for editorial assistance. Medical writing support for the development of this manuscript, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Philippa Lloyd, BSc, and Steve Hill, PhD, of Ashfield MedComms, an Ashfield Health company, and funded by Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), in compliance with Good Publication Practice 3 ethical guidelines (Battisti et al, Ann Intern Med 2015;163:461–4).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Multiple myeloma (MM) patients typically receive several lines of combination therapy and first-line treatment commonly includes lenalidomide. As patients age, they become less tolerant to treatment, requiring convenient/tolerable/lenalidomide-free options. Carfilzomib and/or bortezomib-exposed/intolerant, lenalidomide-refractory MM patients with ≥2 prior lines of therapy were randomized 3:2 to ixazomib-dexamethasone (ixa-dex) (n = 73) or pomalidomide-dexamethasone (pom-dex) (n = 49) until progression/toxicity. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.1 vs 4.8 months with ixa-dex vs pom-dex (HR 0.847, 95% CI 0.535–1.341, P = 0.477; median follow-up: 15.3 vs 17.3 months); there was no statistically significant difference between arms. In patients with 2 and ≥3 prior lines of therapy, respectively, mPFS was 11.0 vs 5.7 months (HR 1.083, 95% CI 0.547–2.144) and 5.7 vs 3.7 months (HR 0.686, 95% CI 0.368–1.279). Among ixa-dex vs pom-dex patients, 69% vs 81% had Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), 51% vs 53% had serious TEAEs, 39% vs 36% had TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation, 44% vs 32% had TEAEs leading to dose reduction, and 13% vs 13% died on study. Quality of life was similar between arms and maintained during treatment. Ixa-dex represents an important lenalidomide-free, oral option for this heavily pretreated, lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed population. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03170882.
AB - Multiple myeloma (MM) patients typically receive several lines of combination therapy and first-line treatment commonly includes lenalidomide. As patients age, they become less tolerant to treatment, requiring convenient/tolerable/lenalidomide-free options. Carfilzomib and/or bortezomib-exposed/intolerant, lenalidomide-refractory MM patients with ≥2 prior lines of therapy were randomized 3:2 to ixazomib-dexamethasone (ixa-dex) (n = 73) or pomalidomide-dexamethasone (pom-dex) (n = 49) until progression/toxicity. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.1 vs 4.8 months with ixa-dex vs pom-dex (HR 0.847, 95% CI 0.535–1.341, P = 0.477; median follow-up: 15.3 vs 17.3 months); there was no statistically significant difference between arms. In patients with 2 and ≥3 prior lines of therapy, respectively, mPFS was 11.0 vs 5.7 months (HR 1.083, 95% CI 0.547–2.144) and 5.7 vs 3.7 months (HR 0.686, 95% CI 0.368–1.279). Among ixa-dex vs pom-dex patients, 69% vs 81% had Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), 51% vs 53% had serious TEAEs, 39% vs 36% had TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation, 44% vs 32% had TEAEs leading to dose reduction, and 13% vs 13% died on study. Quality of life was similar between arms and maintained during treatment. Ixa-dex represents an important lenalidomide-free, oral option for this heavily pretreated, lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed population. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03170882.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123588017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123588017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41408-021-00593-2
DO - 10.1038/s41408-021-00593-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 35075109
AN - SCOPUS:85123588017
SN - 2044-5385
VL - 12
JO - Blood Cancer Journal
JF - Blood Cancer Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 9
ER -