One in seven pathogenic variants can be challenging to detect by NGS: an analysis of 450,000 patients with implications for clinical sensitivity and genetic test implementation

Stephen E. Lincoln, Tina Hambuch, Justin M. Zook, Sara L. Bristow, Kathryn Hatchell, Rebecca Truty, Michael Kennemer, Brian H. Shirts, Andrew Fellowes, Shimul Chowdhury, Eric W. Klee, Shazia Mahamdallie, Megan H. Cleveland, Peter M. Vallone, Yan Ding, Sheila Seal, Wasanthi DeSilva, Farol L. Tomson, Catherine Huang, Russell K. GarlickNazneen Rahman, Marc Salit, Stephen F. Kingsmore, Matthew J. Ferber, Swaroop Aradhya, Robert L. Nussbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of technically challenging variants on the implementation, validation, and diagnostic yield of commonly used clinical genetic tests. Such variants include large indels, small copy-number variants (CNVs), complex alterations, and variants in low-complexity or segmentally duplicated regions. Methods: An interlaboratory pilot study used synthetic specimens to assess detection of challenging variant types by various next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based workflows. One well-performing workflow was further validated and used in clinician-ordered testing of more than 450,000 patients. Results: In the interlaboratory study, only 2 of 13 challenging variants were detected by all 10 workflows, and just 3 workflows detected all 13. Limitations were also observed among 11 less-challenging indels. In clinical testing, 21.6% of patients carried one or more pathogenic variants, of which 13.8% (17,561) were classified as technically challenging. These variants were of diverse types, affecting 556 of 1,217 genes across hereditary cancer, cardiovascular, neurological, pediatric, reproductive carrier screening, and other indicated tests. Conclusion: The analytic and clinical sensitivity of NGS workflows can vary considerably, particularly for prevalent, technically challenging variants. This can have important implications for the design and validation of tests (by laboratories) and the selection of tests (by clinicians) for a wide range of clinical indications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1673-1680
Number of pages8
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'One in seven pathogenic variants can be challenging to detect by NGS: an analysis of 450,000 patients with implications for clinical sensitivity and genetic test implementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this