OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine

Pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program

David William Dodick, Catherine C. Turkel, Ronald E. Degryse, Sheena K. Aurora, Stephen D. Silberstein, Richard B. Lipton, Hans Christoph Diener, Mitchell F. Brin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

423 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. - To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) as headache prophylaxis in adults with chronic migraine. Background. - Chronic migraine is a prevalent, disabling, and undertreated neurological disorder. Few preventive treatments have been investigated and none is specifically indicated for chronic migraine. Methods. - The 2 multicenter, pivotal trials in the PREEMPT: Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy clinical program each included a 24-week randomized, double-blind phase followed by a 32-week open-label phase (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00156910, NCT00168428). Qualified patients were randomized (1:1) to onabotulinumtoxinA (155-195 U) or placebo injections every 12 weeks. Study visits occurred every 4 weeks. These studies were identical in design (eg, inclusion/exclusion criteria, randomization, visits, double-blind phase, open-label phase, safety assessments, treatment), with the only exception being the designation of the primary and secondary endpoints. Therefore, the predefined pooling of the results was justified and performed to provide a complete overview of between-group differences in efficacy, safety, and tolerability that may not have been evident in individual studies. The primary endpoint for the pooled analysis was mean change from baseline in frequency of headache days at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were mean change from baseline to week 24 in frequency of migraine/probable migraine days, frequency of moderate/severe headache days, total cumulative hours of headache on headache days, frequency of headache episodes, frequency of migraine/probable migraine episodes, frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes, and the proportion of patients with severe (≥60) Headache Impact Test-6 score at week 24. Results of the pooled analyses of the 2 PREEMPT double-blind phases are presented. Results. - A total of 1384 adults were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 688) or placebo (n = 696). Pooled analyses demonstrated a large mean decrease from baseline in frequency of headache days, with statistically significant between-group differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA over placebo at week 24 (-8.4 vs -6.6; P <.001) and at all other time points. Significant differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA were also observed for all secondary efficacy variables at all time points, with the exception of frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes. Adverse events occurred in 62.4% of onabotulinumtoxinA patients and 51.7% of placebo patients. Most patients reported adverse events that were mild to moderate in severity and few discontinued (onabotulinumtoxinA, 3.8%; placebo, 1.2%) due to adverse events. No unexpected treatment-related adverse events were identified. Conclusions. - The pooled PREEMPT results demonstrate that onabotulinumtoxinA is an effective prophylactic treatment for chronic migraine. OnabotulinumtoxinA resulted in significant improvements compared with placebo in multiple headache symptom measures, and significantly reduced headache-related disability and improved functioning, vitality, and overall health-related quality of life. Repeat treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA were safe and well tolerated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)921-936
Number of pages16
JournalHeadache
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Migraine Disorders
Headache
Placebos
Therapeutics
Acute Pain
Safety
onabotulinumtoxinA
Random Allocation
Nervous System Diseases
Multicenter Studies
Quality of Life
Injections

Keywords

  • Botulinum toxin A
  • Chronic migraine
  • Prophylaxis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine : Pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. / Dodick, David William; Turkel, Catherine C.; Degryse, Ronald E.; Aurora, Sheena K.; Silberstein, Stephen D.; Lipton, Richard B.; Diener, Hans Christoph; Brin, Mitchell F.

In: Headache, Vol. 50, No. 6, 2010, p. 921-936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dodick, David William ; Turkel, Catherine C. ; Degryse, Ronald E. ; Aurora, Sheena K. ; Silberstein, Stephen D. ; Lipton, Richard B. ; Diener, Hans Christoph ; Brin, Mitchell F. / OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine : Pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. In: Headache. 2010 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 921-936.
@article{87a7ae73536d4f349ea54711709cf26c,
title = "OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program",
abstract = "Objective. - To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX{\circledR}) as headache prophylaxis in adults with chronic migraine. Background. - Chronic migraine is a prevalent, disabling, and undertreated neurological disorder. Few preventive treatments have been investigated and none is specifically indicated for chronic migraine. Methods. - The 2 multicenter, pivotal trials in the PREEMPT: Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy clinical program each included a 24-week randomized, double-blind phase followed by a 32-week open-label phase (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00156910, NCT00168428). Qualified patients were randomized (1:1) to onabotulinumtoxinA (155-195 U) or placebo injections every 12 weeks. Study visits occurred every 4 weeks. These studies were identical in design (eg, inclusion/exclusion criteria, randomization, visits, double-blind phase, open-label phase, safety assessments, treatment), with the only exception being the designation of the primary and secondary endpoints. Therefore, the predefined pooling of the results was justified and performed to provide a complete overview of between-group differences in efficacy, safety, and tolerability that may not have been evident in individual studies. The primary endpoint for the pooled analysis was mean change from baseline in frequency of headache days at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were mean change from baseline to week 24 in frequency of migraine/probable migraine days, frequency of moderate/severe headache days, total cumulative hours of headache on headache days, frequency of headache episodes, frequency of migraine/probable migraine episodes, frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes, and the proportion of patients with severe (≥60) Headache Impact Test-6 score at week 24. Results of the pooled analyses of the 2 PREEMPT double-blind phases are presented. Results. - A total of 1384 adults were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 688) or placebo (n = 696). Pooled analyses demonstrated a large mean decrease from baseline in frequency of headache days, with statistically significant between-group differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA over placebo at week 24 (-8.4 vs -6.6; P <.001) and at all other time points. Significant differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA were also observed for all secondary efficacy variables at all time points, with the exception of frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes. Adverse events occurred in 62.4{\%} of onabotulinumtoxinA patients and 51.7{\%} of placebo patients. Most patients reported adverse events that were mild to moderate in severity and few discontinued (onabotulinumtoxinA, 3.8{\%}; placebo, 1.2{\%}) due to adverse events. No unexpected treatment-related adverse events were identified. Conclusions. - The pooled PREEMPT results demonstrate that onabotulinumtoxinA is an effective prophylactic treatment for chronic migraine. OnabotulinumtoxinA resulted in significant improvements compared with placebo in multiple headache symptom measures, and significantly reduced headache-related disability and improved functioning, vitality, and overall health-related quality of life. Repeat treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA were safe and well tolerated.",
keywords = "Botulinum toxin A, Chronic migraine, Prophylaxis",
author = "Dodick, {David William} and Turkel, {Catherine C.} and Degryse, {Ronald E.} and Aurora, {Sheena K.} and Silberstein, {Stephen D.} and Lipton, {Richard B.} and Diener, {Hans Christoph} and Brin, {Mitchell F.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "921--936",
journal = "Headache",
issn = "0017-8748",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine

T2 - Pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program

AU - Dodick, David William

AU - Turkel, Catherine C.

AU - Degryse, Ronald E.

AU - Aurora, Sheena K.

AU - Silberstein, Stephen D.

AU - Lipton, Richard B.

AU - Diener, Hans Christoph

AU - Brin, Mitchell F.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Objective. - To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) as headache prophylaxis in adults with chronic migraine. Background. - Chronic migraine is a prevalent, disabling, and undertreated neurological disorder. Few preventive treatments have been investigated and none is specifically indicated for chronic migraine. Methods. - The 2 multicenter, pivotal trials in the PREEMPT: Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy clinical program each included a 24-week randomized, double-blind phase followed by a 32-week open-label phase (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00156910, NCT00168428). Qualified patients were randomized (1:1) to onabotulinumtoxinA (155-195 U) or placebo injections every 12 weeks. Study visits occurred every 4 weeks. These studies were identical in design (eg, inclusion/exclusion criteria, randomization, visits, double-blind phase, open-label phase, safety assessments, treatment), with the only exception being the designation of the primary and secondary endpoints. Therefore, the predefined pooling of the results was justified and performed to provide a complete overview of between-group differences in efficacy, safety, and tolerability that may not have been evident in individual studies. The primary endpoint for the pooled analysis was mean change from baseline in frequency of headache days at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were mean change from baseline to week 24 in frequency of migraine/probable migraine days, frequency of moderate/severe headache days, total cumulative hours of headache on headache days, frequency of headache episodes, frequency of migraine/probable migraine episodes, frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes, and the proportion of patients with severe (≥60) Headache Impact Test-6 score at week 24. Results of the pooled analyses of the 2 PREEMPT double-blind phases are presented. Results. - A total of 1384 adults were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 688) or placebo (n = 696). Pooled analyses demonstrated a large mean decrease from baseline in frequency of headache days, with statistically significant between-group differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA over placebo at week 24 (-8.4 vs -6.6; P <.001) and at all other time points. Significant differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA were also observed for all secondary efficacy variables at all time points, with the exception of frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes. Adverse events occurred in 62.4% of onabotulinumtoxinA patients and 51.7% of placebo patients. Most patients reported adverse events that were mild to moderate in severity and few discontinued (onabotulinumtoxinA, 3.8%; placebo, 1.2%) due to adverse events. No unexpected treatment-related adverse events were identified. Conclusions. - The pooled PREEMPT results demonstrate that onabotulinumtoxinA is an effective prophylactic treatment for chronic migraine. OnabotulinumtoxinA resulted in significant improvements compared with placebo in multiple headache symptom measures, and significantly reduced headache-related disability and improved functioning, vitality, and overall health-related quality of life. Repeat treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA were safe and well tolerated.

AB - Objective. - To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) as headache prophylaxis in adults with chronic migraine. Background. - Chronic migraine is a prevalent, disabling, and undertreated neurological disorder. Few preventive treatments have been investigated and none is specifically indicated for chronic migraine. Methods. - The 2 multicenter, pivotal trials in the PREEMPT: Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy clinical program each included a 24-week randomized, double-blind phase followed by a 32-week open-label phase (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00156910, NCT00168428). Qualified patients were randomized (1:1) to onabotulinumtoxinA (155-195 U) or placebo injections every 12 weeks. Study visits occurred every 4 weeks. These studies were identical in design (eg, inclusion/exclusion criteria, randomization, visits, double-blind phase, open-label phase, safety assessments, treatment), with the only exception being the designation of the primary and secondary endpoints. Therefore, the predefined pooling of the results was justified and performed to provide a complete overview of between-group differences in efficacy, safety, and tolerability that may not have been evident in individual studies. The primary endpoint for the pooled analysis was mean change from baseline in frequency of headache days at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were mean change from baseline to week 24 in frequency of migraine/probable migraine days, frequency of moderate/severe headache days, total cumulative hours of headache on headache days, frequency of headache episodes, frequency of migraine/probable migraine episodes, frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes, and the proportion of patients with severe (≥60) Headache Impact Test-6 score at week 24. Results of the pooled analyses of the 2 PREEMPT double-blind phases are presented. Results. - A total of 1384 adults were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 688) or placebo (n = 696). Pooled analyses demonstrated a large mean decrease from baseline in frequency of headache days, with statistically significant between-group differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA over placebo at week 24 (-8.4 vs -6.6; P <.001) and at all other time points. Significant differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA were also observed for all secondary efficacy variables at all time points, with the exception of frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes. Adverse events occurred in 62.4% of onabotulinumtoxinA patients and 51.7% of placebo patients. Most patients reported adverse events that were mild to moderate in severity and few discontinued (onabotulinumtoxinA, 3.8%; placebo, 1.2%) due to adverse events. No unexpected treatment-related adverse events were identified. Conclusions. - The pooled PREEMPT results demonstrate that onabotulinumtoxinA is an effective prophylactic treatment for chronic migraine. OnabotulinumtoxinA resulted in significant improvements compared with placebo in multiple headache symptom measures, and significantly reduced headache-related disability and improved functioning, vitality, and overall health-related quality of life. Repeat treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA were safe and well tolerated.

KW - Botulinum toxin A

KW - Chronic migraine

KW - Prophylaxis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953218035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953218035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 921

EP - 936

JO - Headache

JF - Headache

SN - 0017-8748

IS - 6

ER -