On the Effects of Spatial Sampling Quantization in Super-Resolution Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ultrasound super-resolution (SR) microvessel imaging technologies are rapidly emerging and evolving. The unprecedented combination of imaging resolution and penetration promises a wide range of preclinical and clinical applications. This study concerns spatial quantization error in SR imaging, a common issue that involves a majority of current SR imaging methods. While quantization error can be alleviated by the microbubble localization process (e.g., via upsampling or parametric fitting), it is unclear to what extent the localization process can suppress the spatial quantization error induced by discrete sampling. It is also unclear when low spatial sampling frequency will result in irreversible quantization errors that cannot be suppressed by the localization process. This study had two goals: 1) to systematically investigate the effect of quantization in SR imaging and establish principles of adequate SR imaging spatial sampling that yield minimal quantization error with proper localization methods; 2) to compare the performance of various localization methods and study the level of tolerance of each method to quantization. We conducted experiments on a small wire target and on a microbubble flow phantom. We found that Fourier analysis of an oversampled spatial profile of the microbubble signal could provide reliable guidance for selecting beamforming spatial sampling frequency. Among various localization methods, parametric Gaussian fitting and centroid-based localization on upsampled data had better microbubble localization performance and were less susceptible to quantization error than peak intensity-based localization methods. When spatial sampling resolution was low, parametric Gaussian fitting-based localization had the best performance in suppressing quantization error, and could produce acceptable SR microvessel imaging with no significant quantization artifacts. The findings from this paper can be used in practice to help intelligently determine the minimum requirement of spatial sampling for robust microbubble localization to avoid adding or even reduce the burden of computational cost and data storage that are commonly associated with SR imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 4 2018

Fingerprint

Ultrasonics
sampling
Sampling
Imaging techniques
Fourier analysis
Beamforming
beamforming
data storage
Wire
centroids
Data storage equipment
artifacts
emerging
penetration
wire
costs
requirements
Costs
Experiments
profiles

Keywords

  • Array signal processing
  • contrast microbubbles
  • Image resolution
  • Imaging
  • localization
  • microvessel imaging
  • quantization
  • Quantization (signal)
  • Radio frequency
  • Super-resolution imaging
  • Ultrasonic imaging
  • Wires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Instrumentation
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{f8b9cfd9cf6044ba81680f834a62df68,
title = "On the Effects of Spatial Sampling Quantization in Super-Resolution Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging",
abstract = "Ultrasound super-resolution (SR) microvessel imaging technologies are rapidly emerging and evolving. The unprecedented combination of imaging resolution and penetration promises a wide range of preclinical and clinical applications. This study concerns spatial quantization error in SR imaging, a common issue that involves a majority of current SR imaging methods. While quantization error can be alleviated by the microbubble localization process (e.g., via upsampling or parametric fitting), it is unclear to what extent the localization process can suppress the spatial quantization error induced by discrete sampling. It is also unclear when low spatial sampling frequency will result in irreversible quantization errors that cannot be suppressed by the localization process. This study had two goals: 1) to systematically investigate the effect of quantization in SR imaging and establish principles of adequate SR imaging spatial sampling that yield minimal quantization error with proper localization methods; 2) to compare the performance of various localization methods and study the level of tolerance of each method to quantization. We conducted experiments on a small wire target and on a microbubble flow phantom. We found that Fourier analysis of an oversampled spatial profile of the microbubble signal could provide reliable guidance for selecting beamforming spatial sampling frequency. Among various localization methods, parametric Gaussian fitting and centroid-based localization on upsampled data had better microbubble localization performance and were less susceptible to quantization error than peak intensity-based localization methods. When spatial sampling resolution was low, parametric Gaussian fitting-based localization had the best performance in suppressing quantization error, and could produce acceptable SR microvessel imaging with no significant quantization artifacts. The findings from this paper can be used in practice to help intelligently determine the minimum requirement of spatial sampling for robust microbubble localization to avoid adding or even reduce the burden of computational cost and data storage that are commonly associated with SR imaging.",
keywords = "Array signal processing, contrast microbubbles, Image resolution, Imaging, localization, microvessel imaging, quantization, Quantization (signal), Radio frequency, Super-resolution imaging, Ultrasonic imaging, Wires",
author = "Pengfei Song and Armando Manduca and Trazasko, {Joshua D} and Daigle, {Ronald E.} and Chen, {Shigao D}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2832600",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control",
issn = "0885-3010",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Effects of Spatial Sampling Quantization in Super-Resolution Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging

AU - Song, Pengfei

AU - Manduca, Armando

AU - Trazasko, Joshua D

AU - Daigle, Ronald E.

AU - Chen, Shigao D

PY - 2018/5/4

Y1 - 2018/5/4

N2 - Ultrasound super-resolution (SR) microvessel imaging technologies are rapidly emerging and evolving. The unprecedented combination of imaging resolution and penetration promises a wide range of preclinical and clinical applications. This study concerns spatial quantization error in SR imaging, a common issue that involves a majority of current SR imaging methods. While quantization error can be alleviated by the microbubble localization process (e.g., via upsampling or parametric fitting), it is unclear to what extent the localization process can suppress the spatial quantization error induced by discrete sampling. It is also unclear when low spatial sampling frequency will result in irreversible quantization errors that cannot be suppressed by the localization process. This study had two goals: 1) to systematically investigate the effect of quantization in SR imaging and establish principles of adequate SR imaging spatial sampling that yield minimal quantization error with proper localization methods; 2) to compare the performance of various localization methods and study the level of tolerance of each method to quantization. We conducted experiments on a small wire target and on a microbubble flow phantom. We found that Fourier analysis of an oversampled spatial profile of the microbubble signal could provide reliable guidance for selecting beamforming spatial sampling frequency. Among various localization methods, parametric Gaussian fitting and centroid-based localization on upsampled data had better microbubble localization performance and were less susceptible to quantization error than peak intensity-based localization methods. When spatial sampling resolution was low, parametric Gaussian fitting-based localization had the best performance in suppressing quantization error, and could produce acceptable SR microvessel imaging with no significant quantization artifacts. The findings from this paper can be used in practice to help intelligently determine the minimum requirement of spatial sampling for robust microbubble localization to avoid adding or even reduce the burden of computational cost and data storage that are commonly associated with SR imaging.

AB - Ultrasound super-resolution (SR) microvessel imaging technologies are rapidly emerging and evolving. The unprecedented combination of imaging resolution and penetration promises a wide range of preclinical and clinical applications. This study concerns spatial quantization error in SR imaging, a common issue that involves a majority of current SR imaging methods. While quantization error can be alleviated by the microbubble localization process (e.g., via upsampling or parametric fitting), it is unclear to what extent the localization process can suppress the spatial quantization error induced by discrete sampling. It is also unclear when low spatial sampling frequency will result in irreversible quantization errors that cannot be suppressed by the localization process. This study had two goals: 1) to systematically investigate the effect of quantization in SR imaging and establish principles of adequate SR imaging spatial sampling that yield minimal quantization error with proper localization methods; 2) to compare the performance of various localization methods and study the level of tolerance of each method to quantization. We conducted experiments on a small wire target and on a microbubble flow phantom. We found that Fourier analysis of an oversampled spatial profile of the microbubble signal could provide reliable guidance for selecting beamforming spatial sampling frequency. Among various localization methods, parametric Gaussian fitting and centroid-based localization on upsampled data had better microbubble localization performance and were less susceptible to quantization error than peak intensity-based localization methods. When spatial sampling resolution was low, parametric Gaussian fitting-based localization had the best performance in suppressing quantization error, and could produce acceptable SR microvessel imaging with no significant quantization artifacts. The findings from this paper can be used in practice to help intelligently determine the minimum requirement of spatial sampling for robust microbubble localization to avoid adding or even reduce the burden of computational cost and data storage that are commonly associated with SR imaging.

KW - Array signal processing

KW - contrast microbubbles

KW - Image resolution

KW - Imaging

KW - localization

KW - microvessel imaging

KW - quantization

KW - Quantization (signal)

KW - Radio frequency

KW - Super-resolution imaging

KW - Ultrasonic imaging

KW - Wires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046452212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046452212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2832600

DO - 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2832600

M3 - Article

C2 - 29993999

AN - SCOPUS:85046452212

JO - IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control

JF - IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control

SN - 0885-3010

ER -