TY - JOUR
T1 - Occupational exposures to solvents and lead as risk factors foralzheimer’s disease
T2 - A collaborativere-analysis of case-control studies
AU - A Hofman For The Eurodem Risk Factors Research Group
AU - Graves, A. B.
AU - Van Duijn, C. M.
AU - Chandra, V.
AU - Fratiglioni, L.
AU - Heyman, A.
AU - Jorm, A. F.
AU - Kokmen, E.
AU - Kondo, K.
AU - Mortimer, J. A.
AU - Rocca, W. A.
AU - Shalat, S. L.
AU - Soininen, H.
AU - Hofman, A.
PY - 1991
Y1 - 1991
N2 - A meta-analysis, involving the secondary analysis of original data from 11 case-control studies of Alzheimer’s disease, is presented for occupational exposures to solvents and lead. Three studies had data on occupational exposure to solvents. Among cases, 21.3% were reported to have been exposed; among controls, this figure was comparable(20.9%). This yielded a pooled matched relative risk of 0.76 (95% Cl: 0.47-1.23). Four studies had data on exposure tolead. Exposure frequencies were 6.1% in cases and 8.3% in controls. This resulted in a pooled matched relative risk of0.71 (95% Cl: 0.36-1.41). The meta-analysis was particularly useful in validating negative results from individual studies and in increasing the statistical power for the analysis of lead exposure, where stratum-specific cell sizes were frequently smaller than five in individual studies. However, since exposure in the various studies was ascertained in arather broad manner, prospective studies are recommended which focus on high-risk occupational populations andwhich determine the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in these and comparable unexposed populations.
AB - A meta-analysis, involving the secondary analysis of original data from 11 case-control studies of Alzheimer’s disease, is presented for occupational exposures to solvents and lead. Three studies had data on occupational exposure to solvents. Among cases, 21.3% were reported to have been exposed; among controls, this figure was comparable(20.9%). This yielded a pooled matched relative risk of 0.76 (95% Cl: 0.47-1.23). Four studies had data on exposure tolead. Exposure frequencies were 6.1% in cases and 8.3% in controls. This resulted in a pooled matched relative risk of0.71 (95% Cl: 0.36-1.41). The meta-analysis was particularly useful in validating negative results from individual studies and in increasing the statistical power for the analysis of lead exposure, where stratum-specific cell sizes were frequently smaller than five in individual studies. However, since exposure in the various studies was ascertained in arather broad manner, prospective studies are recommended which focus on high-risk occupational populations andwhich determine the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in these and comparable unexposed populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025882734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025882734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ije/20.Supplement_2.S58
DO - 10.1093/ije/20.Supplement_2.S58
M3 - Article
C2 - 1833355
AN - SCOPUS:0025882734
SN - 0300-5771
VL - 20
SP - S58-S61
JO - International journal of epidemiology
JF - International journal of epidemiology
ER -