Observation or stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Janet Leon, Eric J. Lehrer, Jennifer Peterson, Laura Vallow, Henry Ruiz-Garcia, Austin Hadley, Steven Herchko, Larry B Lundy, Kaisorn Chaichana, Prasanna Vibhute, Jason P. Sheehan, Daniel Trifiletti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors with a slow growth rate. There exists controversy regarding whether patients should receive upfront observation, SRS, FSRT, or surgery at the time of diagnosis. For patients declining resection, this systematic review evaluates the risks and benefits between observation and SRS upon diagnosis of VS. Methods: Published studies on VS (including acoustic neuromas) were systematically reviewed for clinical series including patients with newly/recently diagnosed unilateral VS. Studies that included patients with previous treatment for the VS or focused on patients with neurofibromatosis (or other genetic conditions) were excluded. Review articles and systematic reviews were excluded but reviewed for relevant references that would otherwise meet search criteria. Results: Most patients electing observation underwent their first surveillance scan 6 months after initial diagnosis, then annually or every-other-year thereafter. Follow up was similar for patients receiving radiosurgery. The follow up period varied between studies as not all studies published at a specific time point. Observation alone conferred a radiographic tumor control rate of 65% and serviceable hearing in 71.3% at by the end of the follow up period in the reviewed studies, and 34% of patients initially opting for observation went on to ultimately elect for treatment. Initial radiosurgery resulted in a tumor control rate of 97% and serviceable hearing rate of 73.8% at by the end of the follow up period. Radiosurgery resulted in improved tumor control at the end of the follow up period (p < 0.0001), and serviceable hearing did not statistically differ (p = 0.69). There is an early risk of progressive hearing decline on patients who chose initial observation. Conclusion: Based on the available published data, observation after initial diagnosis is appropriate for many patients with VS without symptomatic brainstem compression. However, initial observation does risk early progressive hearing dysfunction and patients with serviceable hearing at diagnosis may benefit from early therapy. Long term follow up is critical, and an algorithm to better risk-stratify patients with newly diagnosed VS is underway.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-100
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Radiosurgery and SBRT
Volume6
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Acoustic Neuroma
Radiosurgery
Meta-Analysis
Observation
Hearing
Neoplasms
Neurofibromatoses
Secondary Prevention
Brain Stem

Keywords

  • Acoustic neuroma
  • Cyberknife
  • Gamma knife
  • SRS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Observation or stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Leon, Janet; Lehrer, Eric J.; Peterson, Jennifer; Vallow, Laura; Ruiz-Garcia, Henry; Hadley, Austin; Herchko, Steven; Lundy, Larry B; Chaichana, Kaisorn; Vibhute, Prasanna; Sheehan, Jason P.; Trifiletti, Daniel.

In: Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.01.2019, p. 91-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leon, J, Lehrer, EJ, Peterson, J, Vallow, L, Ruiz-Garcia, H, Hadley, A, Herchko, S, Lundy, LB, Chaichana, K, Vibhute, P, Sheehan, JP & Trifiletti, D 2019, 'Observation or stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis', Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 91-100.
Leon, Janet ; Lehrer, Eric J. ; Peterson, Jennifer ; Vallow, Laura ; Ruiz-Garcia, Henry ; Hadley, Austin ; Herchko, Steven ; Lundy, Larry B ; Chaichana, Kaisorn ; Vibhute, Prasanna ; Sheehan, Jason P. ; Trifiletti, Daniel. / Observation or stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT. 2019 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 91-100.
@article{dca04380694f45768da6d175a7f98a8b,
title = "Observation or stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Introduction: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors with a slow growth rate. There exists controversy regarding whether patients should receive upfront observation, SRS, FSRT, or surgery at the time of diagnosis. For patients declining resection, this systematic review evaluates the risks and benefits between observation and SRS upon diagnosis of VS. Methods: Published studies on VS (including acoustic neuromas) were systematically reviewed for clinical series including patients with newly/recently diagnosed unilateral VS. Studies that included patients with previous treatment for the VS or focused on patients with neurofibromatosis (or other genetic conditions) were excluded. Review articles and systematic reviews were excluded but reviewed for relevant references that would otherwise meet search criteria. Results: Most patients electing observation underwent their first surveillance scan 6 months after initial diagnosis, then annually or every-other-year thereafter. Follow up was similar for patients receiving radiosurgery. The follow up period varied between studies as not all studies published at a specific time point. Observation alone conferred a radiographic tumor control rate of 65{\%} and serviceable hearing in 71.3{\%} at by the end of the follow up period in the reviewed studies, and 34{\%} of patients initially opting for observation went on to ultimately elect for treatment. Initial radiosurgery resulted in a tumor control rate of 97{\%} and serviceable hearing rate of 73.8{\%} at by the end of the follow up period. Radiosurgery resulted in improved tumor control at the end of the follow up period (p < 0.0001), and serviceable hearing did not statistically differ (p = 0.69). There is an early risk of progressive hearing decline on patients who chose initial observation. Conclusion: Based on the available published data, observation after initial diagnosis is appropriate for many patients with VS without symptomatic brainstem compression. However, initial observation does risk early progressive hearing dysfunction and patients with serviceable hearing at diagnosis may benefit from early therapy. Long term follow up is critical, and an algorithm to better risk-stratify patients with newly diagnosed VS is underway.",
keywords = "Acoustic neuroma, Cyberknife, Gamma knife, SRS",
author = "Janet Leon and Lehrer, {Eric J.} and Jennifer Peterson and Laura Vallow and Henry Ruiz-Garcia and Austin Hadley and Steven Herchko and Lundy, {Larry B} and Kaisorn Chaichana and Prasanna Vibhute and Sheehan, {Jason P.} and Daniel Trifiletti",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "91--100",
journal = "Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT",
issn = "2156-4639",
publisher = "Old City Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observation or stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Leon, Janet

AU - Lehrer, Eric J.

AU - Peterson, Jennifer

AU - Vallow, Laura

AU - Ruiz-Garcia, Henry

AU - Hadley, Austin

AU - Herchko, Steven

AU - Lundy, Larry B

AU - Chaichana, Kaisorn

AU - Vibhute, Prasanna

AU - Sheehan, Jason P.

AU - Trifiletti, Daniel

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors with a slow growth rate. There exists controversy regarding whether patients should receive upfront observation, SRS, FSRT, or surgery at the time of diagnosis. For patients declining resection, this systematic review evaluates the risks and benefits between observation and SRS upon diagnosis of VS. Methods: Published studies on VS (including acoustic neuromas) were systematically reviewed for clinical series including patients with newly/recently diagnosed unilateral VS. Studies that included patients with previous treatment for the VS or focused on patients with neurofibromatosis (or other genetic conditions) were excluded. Review articles and systematic reviews were excluded but reviewed for relevant references that would otherwise meet search criteria. Results: Most patients electing observation underwent their first surveillance scan 6 months after initial diagnosis, then annually or every-other-year thereafter. Follow up was similar for patients receiving radiosurgery. The follow up period varied between studies as not all studies published at a specific time point. Observation alone conferred a radiographic tumor control rate of 65% and serviceable hearing in 71.3% at by the end of the follow up period in the reviewed studies, and 34% of patients initially opting for observation went on to ultimately elect for treatment. Initial radiosurgery resulted in a tumor control rate of 97% and serviceable hearing rate of 73.8% at by the end of the follow up period. Radiosurgery resulted in improved tumor control at the end of the follow up period (p < 0.0001), and serviceable hearing did not statistically differ (p = 0.69). There is an early risk of progressive hearing decline on patients who chose initial observation. Conclusion: Based on the available published data, observation after initial diagnosis is appropriate for many patients with VS without symptomatic brainstem compression. However, initial observation does risk early progressive hearing dysfunction and patients with serviceable hearing at diagnosis may benefit from early therapy. Long term follow up is critical, and an algorithm to better risk-stratify patients with newly diagnosed VS is underway.

AB - Introduction: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors with a slow growth rate. There exists controversy regarding whether patients should receive upfront observation, SRS, FSRT, or surgery at the time of diagnosis. For patients declining resection, this systematic review evaluates the risks and benefits between observation and SRS upon diagnosis of VS. Methods: Published studies on VS (including acoustic neuromas) were systematically reviewed for clinical series including patients with newly/recently diagnosed unilateral VS. Studies that included patients with previous treatment for the VS or focused on patients with neurofibromatosis (or other genetic conditions) were excluded. Review articles and systematic reviews were excluded but reviewed for relevant references that would otherwise meet search criteria. Results: Most patients electing observation underwent their first surveillance scan 6 months after initial diagnosis, then annually or every-other-year thereafter. Follow up was similar for patients receiving radiosurgery. The follow up period varied between studies as not all studies published at a specific time point. Observation alone conferred a radiographic tumor control rate of 65% and serviceable hearing in 71.3% at by the end of the follow up period in the reviewed studies, and 34% of patients initially opting for observation went on to ultimately elect for treatment. Initial radiosurgery resulted in a tumor control rate of 97% and serviceable hearing rate of 73.8% at by the end of the follow up period. Radiosurgery resulted in improved tumor control at the end of the follow up period (p < 0.0001), and serviceable hearing did not statistically differ (p = 0.69). There is an early risk of progressive hearing decline on patients who chose initial observation. Conclusion: Based on the available published data, observation after initial diagnosis is appropriate for many patients with VS without symptomatic brainstem compression. However, initial observation does risk early progressive hearing dysfunction and patients with serviceable hearing at diagnosis may benefit from early therapy. Long term follow up is critical, and an algorithm to better risk-stratify patients with newly diagnosed VS is underway.

KW - Acoustic neuroma

KW - Cyberknife

KW - Gamma knife

KW - SRS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071490428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071490428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071490428

VL - 6

SP - 91

EP - 100

JO - Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT

JF - Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT

SN - 2156-4639

IS - 2

ER -