Nutritional status and assessment of patients on home parenteral nutrition: Anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance, or clinical judgment?

Norman G. Egger, Gordon L. Carlson, Jon L. Shaffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The optimal method of assessing protein energy nutritional status in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is unknown. We evaluated protein energy nutritional status in 47 outpatients (23 male; 24 female) on HPN by measuring anthropometry, plasma proteins, and lymphocyte counts and compared these with the results of subjective clinical assessment and bioelectrical impedance measurements. Sixteen of the 47 patients (34%) were underweight (body mass index <5th percentile of the reference) and 21 (45%) were below the 5th percentile of the reference for both triceps skinfold thickness and midarm muscle circumference. Plasma proteins were subnormal in 1-5 patients (2-11%). Lymphocyte counts were subnormal in 19 patients (40%). Clinical assessment classified 23 patients (49%) as well nourished and 24 (51%) as moderately malnourished. Moderately malnourished patients had a significantly lower body mass index than well-nourished patients (P = 0.02). Clinical assessment did not correlate with bioelectrical impedance analysis. Fat-free mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis resulted in values up to 9.4 kg lower and 8 kg higher than fat-free mass obtained by anthropometry. Weighing combined with a subjective clinical assessment is sufficient for evaluation of protein calorie nutritional status in patients on HPN.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalNutrition
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Home Parenteral Nutrition
Anthropometry
Nutrition Assessment
Nutritional Status
Electric Impedance
Lymphocyte Count
Blood Proteins
Body Mass Index
Fats
Skinfold Thickness
Proteins
Thinness
Outpatients
Muscles

Keywords

  • Body composition
  • Home parenteral nutrition
  • Intestinal failure
  • Nutritional assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Surgery
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Nutritional status and assessment of patients on home parenteral nutrition : Anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance, or clinical judgment? / Egger, Norman G.; Carlson, Gordon L.; Shaffer, Jon L.

In: Nutrition, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.1999, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d6c43c7e61134de187b94494a844e7ee,
title = "Nutritional status and assessment of patients on home parenteral nutrition: Anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance, or clinical judgment?",
abstract = "The optimal method of assessing protein energy nutritional status in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is unknown. We evaluated protein energy nutritional status in 47 outpatients (23 male; 24 female) on HPN by measuring anthropometry, plasma proteins, and lymphocyte counts and compared these with the results of subjective clinical assessment and bioelectrical impedance measurements. Sixteen of the 47 patients (34{\%}) were underweight (body mass index <5th percentile of the reference) and 21 (45{\%}) were below the 5th percentile of the reference for both triceps skinfold thickness and midarm muscle circumference. Plasma proteins were subnormal in 1-5 patients (2-11{\%}). Lymphocyte counts were subnormal in 19 patients (40{\%}). Clinical assessment classified 23 patients (49{\%}) as well nourished and 24 (51{\%}) as moderately malnourished. Moderately malnourished patients had a significantly lower body mass index than well-nourished patients (P = 0.02). Clinical assessment did not correlate with bioelectrical impedance analysis. Fat-free mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis resulted in values up to 9.4 kg lower and 8 kg higher than fat-free mass obtained by anthropometry. Weighing combined with a subjective clinical assessment is sufficient for evaluation of protein calorie nutritional status in patients on HPN.",
keywords = "Body composition, Home parenteral nutrition, Intestinal failure, Nutritional assessment",
author = "Egger, {Norman G.} and Carlson, {Gordon L.} and Shaffer, {Jon L.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0899-9007(98)00136-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Nutrition",
issn = "0899-9007",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nutritional status and assessment of patients on home parenteral nutrition

T2 - Anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance, or clinical judgment?

AU - Egger, Norman G.

AU - Carlson, Gordon L.

AU - Shaffer, Jon L.

PY - 1999/1

Y1 - 1999/1

N2 - The optimal method of assessing protein energy nutritional status in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is unknown. We evaluated protein energy nutritional status in 47 outpatients (23 male; 24 female) on HPN by measuring anthropometry, plasma proteins, and lymphocyte counts and compared these with the results of subjective clinical assessment and bioelectrical impedance measurements. Sixteen of the 47 patients (34%) were underweight (body mass index <5th percentile of the reference) and 21 (45%) were below the 5th percentile of the reference for both triceps skinfold thickness and midarm muscle circumference. Plasma proteins were subnormal in 1-5 patients (2-11%). Lymphocyte counts were subnormal in 19 patients (40%). Clinical assessment classified 23 patients (49%) as well nourished and 24 (51%) as moderately malnourished. Moderately malnourished patients had a significantly lower body mass index than well-nourished patients (P = 0.02). Clinical assessment did not correlate with bioelectrical impedance analysis. Fat-free mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis resulted in values up to 9.4 kg lower and 8 kg higher than fat-free mass obtained by anthropometry. Weighing combined with a subjective clinical assessment is sufficient for evaluation of protein calorie nutritional status in patients on HPN.

AB - The optimal method of assessing protein energy nutritional status in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is unknown. We evaluated protein energy nutritional status in 47 outpatients (23 male; 24 female) on HPN by measuring anthropometry, plasma proteins, and lymphocyte counts and compared these with the results of subjective clinical assessment and bioelectrical impedance measurements. Sixteen of the 47 patients (34%) were underweight (body mass index <5th percentile of the reference) and 21 (45%) were below the 5th percentile of the reference for both triceps skinfold thickness and midarm muscle circumference. Plasma proteins were subnormal in 1-5 patients (2-11%). Lymphocyte counts were subnormal in 19 patients (40%). Clinical assessment classified 23 patients (49%) as well nourished and 24 (51%) as moderately malnourished. Moderately malnourished patients had a significantly lower body mass index than well-nourished patients (P = 0.02). Clinical assessment did not correlate with bioelectrical impedance analysis. Fat-free mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis resulted in values up to 9.4 kg lower and 8 kg higher than fat-free mass obtained by anthropometry. Weighing combined with a subjective clinical assessment is sufficient for evaluation of protein calorie nutritional status in patients on HPN.

KW - Body composition

KW - Home parenteral nutrition

KW - Intestinal failure

KW - Nutritional assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032896379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032896379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0899-9007(98)00136-1

DO - 10.1016/S0899-9007(98)00136-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 9918054

AN - SCOPUS:0032896379

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Nutrition

JF - Nutrition

SN - 0899-9007

IS - 1

ER -