Novice and expert muscle utilization and wrist postures during simulated endotrachial intubation - A pilot study

Adam De Laveaga, Michael C. Wadman, Laura Wirth, Susan Hallbeck

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Endotracheal Intubation (ETI) is an airway procedure commonly used to secure the airway for a variety of medical conditions. Endotracheal tube placement is most commonly performed under direct vision of the glottis with the use of a standard laryngoscope and blade. Proficiency in ETI procedures requires significant clinical experience and insufficient data currently exists describing the physical ergonomics of successful direct laryngoscopy. The research objectives of this study were to examine how ETI time, error and practitioner biomechanics varied among clinical experience levels and hospital bed heights. The participant population included novice and expert subgroups recruited from the University of Nebraska Medical Center, and the department of Emergency Medicine. Using a standard laryngoscope handle and blade, participants performed ETI trials on an airway manikin trainer at a minimum and maximum bed height. Participants were evaluated based on ETI completion time, endotracheal tube placement, wrist postures and technique errors. Task completion time and ETI errors did not vary with hospital bed height. Muscle utilization did not differ significantly between bed heights or expert and novice participants. Experts exhibited greater wrist extension and less ulnar deviation during task trials. Expert participants grasped the laryngoscope differently than novice participants, resulting in less wrist manipulation required to achieve ideal instrument positions. By encouraging ideal hand and arm postures during ETI training and simulation, the opportunity exists to improve patient safety and reduce the significant learning curve associated with ETI procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Pages705-709
Number of pages5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event55th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2011 - Las Vegas, NV, United States
Duration: Sep 19 2011Sep 23 2011

Other

Other55th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2011
CountryUnited States
CityLas Vegas, NV
Period9/19/119/23/11

Fingerprint

Hospital beds
Muscle
utilization
expert
Biomechanics
Ergonomics
Medicine
ergonomics
manipulation
experience
medicine
simulation
learning
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

De Laveaga, A., Wadman, M. C., Wirth, L., & Hallbeck, S. (2011). Novice and expert muscle utilization and wrist postures during simulated endotrachial intubation - A pilot study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 705-709) https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551146

Novice and expert muscle utilization and wrist postures during simulated endotrachial intubation - A pilot study. / De Laveaga, Adam; Wadman, Michael C.; Wirth, Laura; Hallbeck, Susan.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2011. p. 705-709.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

De Laveaga, A, Wadman, MC, Wirth, L & Hallbeck, S 2011, Novice and expert muscle utilization and wrist postures during simulated endotrachial intubation - A pilot study. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. pp. 705-709, 55th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2011, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 9/19/11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551146
De Laveaga A, Wadman MC, Wirth L, Hallbeck S. Novice and expert muscle utilization and wrist postures during simulated endotrachial intubation - A pilot study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2011. p. 705-709 https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551146
De Laveaga, Adam ; Wadman, Michael C. ; Wirth, Laura ; Hallbeck, Susan. / Novice and expert muscle utilization and wrist postures during simulated endotrachial intubation - A pilot study. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2011. pp. 705-709
@inproceedings{30bc21568050481090237ad50df0099d,
title = "Novice and expert muscle utilization and wrist postures during simulated endotrachial intubation - A pilot study",
abstract = "Endotracheal Intubation (ETI) is an airway procedure commonly used to secure the airway for a variety of medical conditions. Endotracheal tube placement is most commonly performed under direct vision of the glottis with the use of a standard laryngoscope and blade. Proficiency in ETI procedures requires significant clinical experience and insufficient data currently exists describing the physical ergonomics of successful direct laryngoscopy. The research objectives of this study were to examine how ETI time, error and practitioner biomechanics varied among clinical experience levels and hospital bed heights. The participant population included novice and expert subgroups recruited from the University of Nebraska Medical Center, and the department of Emergency Medicine. Using a standard laryngoscope handle and blade, participants performed ETI trials on an airway manikin trainer at a minimum and maximum bed height. Participants were evaluated based on ETI completion time, endotracheal tube placement, wrist postures and technique errors. Task completion time and ETI errors did not vary with hospital bed height. Muscle utilization did not differ significantly between bed heights or expert and novice participants. Experts exhibited greater wrist extension and less ulnar deviation during task trials. Expert participants grasped the laryngoscope differently than novice participants, resulting in less wrist manipulation required to achieve ideal instrument positions. By encouraging ideal hand and arm postures during ETI training and simulation, the opportunity exists to improve patient safety and reduce the significant learning curve associated with ETI procedures.",
author = "{De Laveaga}, Adam and Wadman, {Michael C.} and Laura Wirth and Susan Hallbeck",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1177/1071181311551146",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780945289395",
pages = "705--709",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Novice and expert muscle utilization and wrist postures during simulated endotrachial intubation - A pilot study

AU - De Laveaga, Adam

AU - Wadman, Michael C.

AU - Wirth, Laura

AU - Hallbeck, Susan

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Endotracheal Intubation (ETI) is an airway procedure commonly used to secure the airway for a variety of medical conditions. Endotracheal tube placement is most commonly performed under direct vision of the glottis with the use of a standard laryngoscope and blade. Proficiency in ETI procedures requires significant clinical experience and insufficient data currently exists describing the physical ergonomics of successful direct laryngoscopy. The research objectives of this study were to examine how ETI time, error and practitioner biomechanics varied among clinical experience levels and hospital bed heights. The participant population included novice and expert subgroups recruited from the University of Nebraska Medical Center, and the department of Emergency Medicine. Using a standard laryngoscope handle and blade, participants performed ETI trials on an airway manikin trainer at a minimum and maximum bed height. Participants were evaluated based on ETI completion time, endotracheal tube placement, wrist postures and technique errors. Task completion time and ETI errors did not vary with hospital bed height. Muscle utilization did not differ significantly between bed heights or expert and novice participants. Experts exhibited greater wrist extension and less ulnar deviation during task trials. Expert participants grasped the laryngoscope differently than novice participants, resulting in less wrist manipulation required to achieve ideal instrument positions. By encouraging ideal hand and arm postures during ETI training and simulation, the opportunity exists to improve patient safety and reduce the significant learning curve associated with ETI procedures.

AB - Endotracheal Intubation (ETI) is an airway procedure commonly used to secure the airway for a variety of medical conditions. Endotracheal tube placement is most commonly performed under direct vision of the glottis with the use of a standard laryngoscope and blade. Proficiency in ETI procedures requires significant clinical experience and insufficient data currently exists describing the physical ergonomics of successful direct laryngoscopy. The research objectives of this study were to examine how ETI time, error and practitioner biomechanics varied among clinical experience levels and hospital bed heights. The participant population included novice and expert subgroups recruited from the University of Nebraska Medical Center, and the department of Emergency Medicine. Using a standard laryngoscope handle and blade, participants performed ETI trials on an airway manikin trainer at a minimum and maximum bed height. Participants were evaluated based on ETI completion time, endotracheal tube placement, wrist postures and technique errors. Task completion time and ETI errors did not vary with hospital bed height. Muscle utilization did not differ significantly between bed heights or expert and novice participants. Experts exhibited greater wrist extension and less ulnar deviation during task trials. Expert participants grasped the laryngoscope differently than novice participants, resulting in less wrist manipulation required to achieve ideal instrument positions. By encouraging ideal hand and arm postures during ETI training and simulation, the opportunity exists to improve patient safety and reduce the significant learning curve associated with ETI procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81855195935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81855195935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1071181311551146

DO - 10.1177/1071181311551146

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:81855195935

SN - 9780945289395

SP - 705

EP - 709

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

ER -